Despite It All, Palin's Got "It"
We have another article to add to the "buy your own damn bagels" file.
Michael Leahy of the Washington Post reports that Gov. Palin's job is challenging. I know. That's quite a shocking revelation. We all thought it was a walk in the park to run the largest state in the union. Who would have imagined that it's stressful at times?
After watching the second part of the Greta interview last night, Mel and I noted that Gov. Palin must be exhausted living in a house with two infants, one of whom is up crying half the night. Despite all the fun "Sarah Palin Facts", she is only human after all.
Leahy reports:
A couple of weeks before the Alaska legislature began this year's session, a bipartisan group of state senators on a retreat a few hours from here invited Gov. Sarah Palin to join them. Accompanied by a retinue of advisers, she took a seat at one end of a conference table and listened passively as Gary Stevens, the president of the Alaska Senate, a former college history professor and a low-key Republican with a reputation for congeniality, expressed delight at her presence.
Would the governor, a smiling Stevens asked, like to share some of her plans and proposals for the coming legislative session?
Palin looked around the room and paused, according to several senators present. "I feel like you guys are always trying to put me on the spot," she said finally, as the room became silent.
Hmm... Why would she think that? Maybe because partisan goat ropes, theatrical fundraising antics, and self-serving political grandstanding has become the order of the day.
Leahy is amazed that the Guv is suddenly cautious about her every move:
Gone was the self-assurance that Alaska had come to know in its young Republican governor, well before her life and career were transformed by Sen. John McCain's selection of her as his vice presidential running mate. "She looked ill at ease, more defensive than we've been accustomed to seeing her," said one legislator who was there and spoke on the condition of anonymity because he said he might need to work with Palin.
A number of factors seem to have contributed to the bumpy homecoming: a residual anger among Democrats for the attack-dog role Palin assumed in the McCain campaign, lingering resentment from Republicans for the part she may have played in McCain's defeat, and a suspicion crossing party lines that the concerns of Alaska, at a time of economic crisis, will now be secondary to her future in national politics.
Nearly every move that Palin makes or does not make, acknowledges Joe Balash, one of her closest aides, is analyzed through a new political prism, scrutinized for its effect on a possible 2012 presidential candidacy. "There's nothing we can do to stop it," he said. "People wonder why she's doing something or not doing something."
The result of all this scrutiny and second-guessing, says one Republican ally, is that "the governor has been feeling beaten up."
Of course she feels beaten up. She has been beaten up. As I've noted before, the Guv can't go back to August 29, 2008, even though her beloved Alaskans wish she could, and perhaps she sometimes wishes she could as well.
The Alaska she left on August 29th no longer exists. She could never go home after the election. Home isn't the same any more. Gov. Palin worked hard to earn her reputation as "a pragmatic, bipartisan-minded reformer," to use the WaPost's own description of the pre-campaign Palin.
During the election she behaved as the quintessential happy warrior dutifully playing the traditional vp candidate's role of partisan attack dog. The veeps always play this part in order to allow the top of the ticket to appear "above it all." If Palin had really "gone rogue" as she was accused, she would have eschewed this thankless role and sailed above it all herself. Instead she tossed her hard-earned bipartisan capital away the moment she became McCain's partisan pitbull.
But she really loved the crusty old bastard, so she gave him her all. She ran to win. She campaigned harder than anyone we've ever seen. And let's be frank: McCain didn't.
Just days before the election, as Palin criss-crossed the battleground states from one rally to another, McCain held a self-serving nostalgic town hall meeting in New Hampshire. What the hell was he doing there? I was half expecting him to sing "Thanks for the Memories."
And then there was his final Saturday Night Live appearance in which he silently stood by as Tina Fey viciously parodied his running mate as a stupid rube with an Evita complex who refuses to return to the backwoods. He validated the caricature of her. Imagine if he had acted in a sketch portraying his wife as a pill-popping Princess Di wanna be. That would have been the caricature of Cindy McCain. Would he have been comfortable with that? Would he have been comfortable if Palin had agreed to be in a sketch that depicted him as a senile warmonger?
Meanwhile Sarah Palin was functioning on four hours of sleep, losing weight at an alarming rate and making herself hoarse giving countless stump speeches -- all in an effort to get McCain's ancient ass elected, and this was the thanks she got? Part of me really wanted her to flip him the bird and head back to her oil fiefdom in the wild North.
But she could never go back.
She never left the campaign. The campaign continues because she is rightly seen as Obama's de facto 2012 opponent. It seemed perfectly natural that on the eve of Obama's defining act as president, it was Sarah Palin who sounded the opposition's final warning: "Mr. President, veto that bill!"
The sophisticates can play their little games, but we all know who the uncrowned leader of the opposition is. When we think seriously about who could defeat Obama -- who could inspire the public and galvanize a grassroots army -- we know it's Sarah Palin.
We know it. And so do the Dems. And so do the crackbrained weirdies of the leftwing fruitlooposphere. That's why the campaign has never ended.
Leahy notes:
Early in her term, her staunchest allies on state ethics reform and pivotal energy issues included several liberal Democrats. Alaska's current House Democratic leader, Beth Kerttula, joined Palin in successfully arguing for the adoption of a controversial oil tax increase that the industry resisted. "She was... completely a pragmatist," Kerttula recalls. "She knew she had to work with Democrats."
Now, two abortion-related bills that Palin had made little effort to promote have been reintroduced, and another Republican legislator has pushed for the state's adoption of a death penalty, something last seen in Alaska during its territorial days. Palin has voiced support for all three bills, but there have been no signs yet of any hard push from the governor's office.
Some Alaska Democrats and Republicans wonder whether Palin, given her new stature among social conservatives who are urging her to run for president, will feel compelled to invest more political capital in the two abortion-related measures.
Balash indicates that this is unlikely. "It'd be great if we could consider every issue in a vacuum, but we can't. That doesn't please everyone."
I predict that she'll steer clear of these contentious issues. Smart leaders pick their battles. Palin wants her in-state bullet gas line. She wants her joint electric utilities corporation. She doesn't want to get sidetracked with capital punishment and abortion bills that stir up partisan rancor and have uncertain legislative support.
With the Palin family drama being rehashed in the latest "On the Record" interviews, the pending release of the Ziegler documentary and the new "intimate" unauthorized biography, Palin is still a fixture in the national news. A 1000+ comment thread at Hot Air on the same day that Obama signed our future away testifies to the power and lure of Palin-mania.
What other conservative politician inspired such loyalty and loathing?
Ronald Reagan comes to mind.
And Reagan comes to mind in something I read in Leahy's article:
Many legislators believe that the only lasting intimate in her inner circle is an adviser without an official title -- her husband, Todd. "She keeps all of us at arm's length because she's not afraid to drop the hammer on any of us and hold us accountable," said Balash, an unabashed admirer of her leadership style.
It was the same way with the Reagans. The Gipper trusted his Nancy implicitly -- just as the 'Cuda trusts her Todd.

Leahy discusses Palin's decision to stay close to home and stay out of the media limelight. They include advice from an anonymous GOP strategist:
"There are few political performers in her league, in her ability to draw crowds and stand in front of 10,000, 20,000 people and excite them," said one prominent GOP strategist who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "But the campaign also demonstrated that there is a lack of gravity to her that has hurt. She needs to mitigate her weaknesses. She needs to prepare more, know more. She should try to disappear for a while and be an indisputably effective governor."
Good advice, but...
Palin's greatest problems in Alaska, as in the rest of the country, seem to be with her fellow Republicans. "What did I say about her during the campaign when somebody asked me if she was qualified?" asked state Rep. John Harris, taking a moment to ponder his own question, smiling. "Oh, I said something like 'She's old enough and a registered voter.' " Another smile.
A former speaker of the state House, Harris believes that Palin and her team need to improve relationships with legislators.
"A lot of people around here see it as the Eva Peron syndrome -- Sarah being Evita," said Larry Persily, a top aide to Mike Hawker (R), co-chairman of the state House's Finance Committee. "She doesn't care about the political establishment, but the people in the streets love her."
Ah, yes... the good ole Republican boys of Alaska... We know how much they love her.
The Jerk from Fairbanks' first reaction to the news of her vp candidacy was to make a statement implying that she's Alaska's answer to Madame Mao, and now we have Hawker's top aide comparing her to Eva Peron. Nice. Any other evil female leader these latent-misogynists would like to compare her to? Why not call her Jezebel and be done with it?
Leahy buys into the bull:
Yet some Republican observers privately wonder whether Palin will be burdened by her divisive impact on people -- and possibly dismissed as someone with a formidable base who is too polarizing and parodied to win nationally.
Ah, yes, the "polarizing and parodied" figure... Sort of like "Ronald Ray-gun" that crazy b-rate actor, "Drugstore Truck Drivin' Man," rightwing commie-hating nut who would nuke the planet the moment he got his hands on the launch codes. He could never win a general election. He was too old and too fringe.
But maybe Palin is not so fringe after all...
Asked how Palin deals with the perception that months of ridicule have irreversibly turned her into what one Alaskan GOP legislator calls "Dan Quayle with a ponytail," Balash confidently responds that she displays political skills that no other Republican on the national scene has shown an ability to match. "She walks into a room, and things change," he said. "She just has that 'it' -- whatever that 'it' is."
The "it" was on display one night last month when Palin appeared inside the modest chamber of the Alaska House of Representatives to deliver her annual State of the State address. An audible buzz served as a reminder of the asset that Malek believes will keep her at least on Republicans' minds for elections to come.
Yeah, she's got "it" alright.







71 comments:
Oh, that pic! That white shirt and black skirt was her best dress ever. Pics of her in that dress are my favorite. But, she looks even more alluring from behind if that's possible. She could beat half the Hollywood to shame.
Ramrocks, another masterpiece.
Guys, should send our next batch of bagels to Leahy?
At least, that Balash guy seems to be winsome.
Ugh - did you see the second-to-last paragraph of that Post article?
"Reading from a teleprompter, Palin called for a state hiring freeze to address a looming budget deficit.."
I wonder how many articles about an Obama speech mention his teleprompter? Screw the Post.
Man. Where to start?
#1 WE OWE HER.
After all this woman has been through, I'm willing to move heaven and earth to get her in the WH. I get sick to my stomach when I see her being treated this way just for loving her country and standing up for the Constitution.
When I see the new site masthead, with Sarah saluting the flag, I'm reminded of Duh1, who showed contempt when offered the same chance.
As for that "bipartisan group of senators from Alaska," looming over her like vultures with their sly "So whadya got for us?" set up, I wish Sarah wouldn't have gone of the defensive but said something like, "Oh, I don't know. You guys were also elected. What bright ideas have you got? I don't want to get all the CREDIT. Afterall, YOU invited ME."
And while the MSM has a vested interest in seeing SP fail, the masochists just can't help themselves and feature her or her family anytime they can just to get ratings.
And if Juan McSame had any honor at all, he'd get Cindy to agree to throw in a few mil or so for SP's 2012 run.
And as for Todd being her only soundingboard, I have a feeling that good buddy Meg is standing by to be a shoulder to lean on when the going gets tough.
Sarah will do the right thing for Alaska and the country if given the chance. I'm beaming her nothing but white light down here in the lower 48. You go, Girl!
And as for the lame-o GOP with their Palin bias, screw 'em.
She's got enough of a following that she'd win running as a Libertarian or Constitutionalist.
Great article. A lot of work went into that.
Hey, I went on my usual pacing and I managed to deconstruct it. The rest is chaff, its intent is of the Post and the Alaska GOP is to know what she's going to do next. is she running for re-election? I she going to run for national office? That's what they want to know and they are slamming her for keeps her cards close to her chest.
VO--how bout Joyless Behar stating that she, unlike the Messiah, never wrote any of the campaign speeches, therefore was an empty...skirt??? even though we all know P BO did NOT write any of his speeches (until that EPIC FAILURE of an inag.)...
Ramrocks....damn girl....
You so wonderfully pointed out everything ive know for so long, she did work tirelessly for McUsed to be knda RINO but for some reason is on fire 4 months after the election...she did loose a drastic amount of weight and she didnt get her voice back until weeks after...she played her role as "pitbull" and one over people at the alarming rate that BO did, some rallies i would estimate to be larger than his...
and i agree...she cannot win...
every step she makes, or doesnt is scrutinized first because of furute aspirations and second because she is a woman after all...it still annoys me that she is the only person in politics that is not allowed to be ambitious...but...
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't."-Eleanor Roosevelt
im glad she has a strong faith, strong family, and of course Todd to get her through these rough days...ive been noting for awhile now just how tired and stressed she looks in her interviews....i marvel at her inner strength and determination...
McLame was a complete bust until Palin arrived. Instead of appreciating what she has done for his campaign, he doesn't defend her and ridicules her! I know people are praising his attack against the porkulus, but we all know his insincerity. Conservatives are beyond annoyed with him and he is doing some political posturing to garner votes. I really hope a great conservative will run against him in 2012 and that SarahPAC endorses his opponent.
Gotta love how positively the Post portrays Gary Stevens as "affable". Stevens was the douchebag who rammed through the kangaroo court "contempt" resolution against Todd Palin without ever giving him a chance to explain or respond.
side note...
everytime i see that picture of her and Todd as well as this one..
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=1497364&l=6f402&id=628817033
im torn between absolute admiration and a deep-seeded feelings of jealousy...
Thanks for another great one Ramrocks. I'm sitting here in Chicago and can't help but compare Palin's treatment by Alaskan legislators and the MSM with the deification of Chicago politicians whether or not they have been recently indicted or impeached. The media in Chicago fell all over Obama this past weekend, more concerned about where he and his wife were having dinner than the repercussions of the disastrous "Porkulus." Meanwhile, the media seems to be laughing at the latest in the Burris/Blago affair. It seems like there is no such thing as bad publicity for a Chicago Machine pol. Additionally, every single Illinois and Chicago Dem jumped on and are still on the bandwagon for the President. In Chicago, this simply means that they want something from the power. I can't understand why Alaskan politicians can't see that Sarah has some influence now and, if nothing else, brings attention to the good in Alaska or can help facilitate solutions to the problems. Instead, they seem jealous and protective. Maybe Sarah isn't "wired" to run government that way or years in Chicago have ruined my perception of government can be.
I don't mean to rehash the double standards here, but, our continued support of Sarah and a commitment to hold Obama and the Dems in Congress accountable will be incredibly important as we move forward. Keep up the good work.
Regarding the Hot Air thread..
To call Debbie schussel a kook is a disservice to real kooks.
my goodness.
BTW..
Ramrocks.. You rock.
Hey guys, Glenn Beck is giving high praise on Sarah and her handling of the Alaskan budget in comparison to Ahnuld and his failure in California.
He is also defending her against the article that said there may be a"chonkin her armor" because of low gas prices. His defense was solid!
That picture as the top is awesome
just sayin
If everyone of her supporters donated $5 or $10 every time a hit piece like this appeared in the MSM, SarahPAC would raise millions every month.
We know the game they are playing, and so does the Guv, and so does anyone with a brain.
McCain would have lost by McGovern or Mondale proportions if Gov. Palin hadn't been on the ticket.
How many people would have stood in line for hours to see Lieberman, Ridge or Pawlenty. Their rallies would have been the size of Biden's, ranging from a few dozen to a few hundred, and maybe a couple of thousand once in awhile. How many volunteers would have turned out for any of these other possible VP candidates? I'm guessing very few. How much was donated to the campaign prior to Gov. Palin's selection as compared to afterwards? I know over $10 million was donated in the first 3 days after her selection.
Yes, Gov. Palin is being hammered, and will continue to be until at least 2012, we know it, she knows it, but every time I see her she is very upbeat, and not beat down. Her favorability rating is rising, and I'm predicting that by the end of this year it will be close to 60 percent favorable, and 30 or less unfavorable. By 2012 she will be the "historic" candidate, and represent the change we need. That is, if she choses to run. She has to want what we want her to want, it is ultimately up to her.
Greg, that's a very good idea. The Dems do it all the time. Every time there is a slightly negative piece about them somewhere, they immediately shoot off a fundraising letter. I dunno if SaraPac woul do such a thing but I think her supporters should establish some sort of email system (emails can be forwarded), to protect her.
Also, it wouldn't be a bad idea to find a conservative humorist who can take on Obama like Tina Fey did to Sarah.
Gloves off, heels on. ( I mean metaphorically, I don't even go near these things, I swear).
That's one of those outfits, that supposedly made it to the trash bins, but she was wearing as
recently as the Chambliss rally, two months ago. right. I have a similar picture on the masthead of my blog;narcisocorner.blogspot.com
They heard the State of the State Speech, didn't they watch it, or the press availability, or they don't care. She has the Reserve that will keep the state solvent through the next few years.However,
thanks to the 'porkulus bill' the legislatures can in debt them, without her imput. Of course, there's a usual slam from the Annette Kreitser, the revenue commissioner, whose only mention was in the letter to Hollis French,saying she has to pay taxes on the per diem, thanks to the Washington Post's tirelessanalysis.
Let me get this straight we're going into debt for the better part of a trillion dollars, and we have to focus on 17,000 in back taxes. If it wasn't for the fact, that I don't see an alternative,
I'd tell her not to take the chance in 2012; but like Obi Wan Kenobi, she is turning out to be
the 'only hope
I know it'svery selfish of me but I can literally live through the net four years only knowing there's a great leader waiting who can make things right.
Great blog and a great job on it.
I really enjoyed reading it.
I'll be back again soon.
Stay safe
Eva Peron? Yeah, because that Sarah Palin sure has socialistic leanings (sarc)...
Glenn Beck's defense of the Governor and how she has managed the Alaskan budget was spot on! It certainly made up for the ridiculous "commentary" Bill Bennett spewed this morning regarding Sarah and Bristol Palin. I'm still so angry about it that I've been putting off sending him an e-mail because I don't want to sound like some lunatic. I need to calm down first, LOL!
Did Bill Bennett talk about gambling, too?
I got enraged at Bill O'Reilly last night (don't usually watch him, but I left the TV on Fox News after Greta.) He was conflating Bristol Palin with that ridiculous "13-year-old Dad" story from England, and had a couple of liberal women sex educators on.
The guests were shamelessly spreading the meme that Governor Palin doesn't believe in contraception and nobody corrected them. Damn, it pisses me off!
BOR is just pissed that Greta always gets the dish with Sarah and not him..
Yeah, I caught Bill Bennett this morning too, and first I thought, hypocrite, who are you to judge an 18 year old's mistake when you've had enough of your own personal issues. The GOP is never going to reunite and win again with all of this infighting.
Again, as I said on numerous blogs yesterday, what do Bristol's views (she's 18 and an adult) have to do with Sarah's views and how she would govern?
Ain't it the truth, Dave C, Oh and another piece from the AD News re
the revenue commissioner over the per diem thing, which goes into the hopper, with all the other trash like Ashley Judd.
Narciso, did you notice that the ADN buried the fact deep in their article that it was Governor Palin herself who asked that the per diem tax issue be reviewed?
What did Bill Bennett say?
I heard Bill Bennett too. He is the last person to talk about appropriateness and moral integrity.
He is another dinosaur RINO.
He really is horny for Romney. He just had him on and then went on this diatribe against Bristol and Sarah.
Why not talk about policies and leave the personal issues out? He is the same doofus that decried the use of Bristol as political football and he is now doing what he ridiculed! The nerve really.
Glenn Beck came on afterwards and brought some sanity back about Sarah and her POLICIES.
Even though she gave him (BOR) a shout-out in her Fairness Doctrine comments to Greta.
Yeah, I wish someone would e-mail him the Gov's quote about teaching contraception. And that he would read it in his e-mail segment ...
Do any you crack researchers have that quote? I think it's as recent as last year.
I saw it, it looks like although she enjoined French in his subpoena witchhunt, she doesn't want to let her be unscathed, according to the only reference I saw on her on Google. I'm so
fracking (can I say that) of these people, letting Geithner who didn't pay,for 5 years,and he gets to be Treasury Secretary, and Daschle almost got to be health care czar, she took the allowable deductions, and now they're are penalizing her, but it's par for the course. The Sun King, must be
celebrated specially now they can search your home, without a warrant, for a gun to check for gun registration. But he said, he wouldn't do that last fall, because he didn't have the votes, well now it looks like he does.
I didn't hear what Bill Bennett said on his radio show but here is what he wrote on his morning report:
5. "On the culture front, several weeks ago, I said I thought Governor Sarah Palin should take a break from media interviews; regroup in Alaska, govern the state, stay on focus, and see where things take her in the future. I did not mean to imply she should farm out the interviews to her children, and certainly not Bristol Palin—her 18-year-old daughter, now the unwed mother of a baby boy. But, the Palins evidently allowed Fox News into their home this week to interview Bristol about her life and her thoughts on a range of issues; and when Greta Van Susteren asked Bristol about the message she wanted to convey about her teen and unwed pregnancy, Bristol said: "I don’t know how to put it [her position on contraception] — like, the main — everyone should be abstinent or whatever, but it’s not realistic at all." Greta then asked why and Bristol responded: "Because it’s [teen sex] more and more accepted now."
"So, abstinence—to Bristol—is not "realistic at all" because teen sex is so much more accepted. That’s precisely why supporters of abstinence support abstinence: not because teen sex is rare but because teen abstinence is necessary, and for a host of reasons Mrs. Bennett and Kathryn Lopez and Carol Liebau and Mona Charen and others on this show have discussed."
"But as large an issue is this: when the left was trying to make a political point about abstinence education during the campaign, many of us (especially Bill Kristol and myself) were saying we should leave Bristol alone, and we should certainly not make policy prescriptions based on her one, not-fully-known story and example—that it was rather unseemly to do that, as well as to throw this young woman into the spotlight of a tough political campaign that way. Now, we can no longer say that because the Palins thought it okay to allow Fox News into their house to interview Bristol on her thoughts on these matters—and to propound public policy prescriptions; getting them exactly wrong along the way."
"This is really all very unfortunate. And I think unless and until Bristol and the father of her child (Levi Johnston) get married, they really ought to think about what messages they are broadcasting and stop broadcasting them. They are not good, by example, by word, or by deed. And if there is any political future for Governor Palin, she should take some serious counsel here too: no more klieg lights highlighting the wrong things. Children and parents are watching and learning and the lessons we teach are being absorbed."
LINK: http://www.bennettmornings.com/blog?action=viewBlog&blogID=-488597479458625354
Thanks for another great post. I think there is no doubt that the Guv has been beat up and it probably is weighing on her. But, she is the type of person who will be the stronger for it. And whatever she does, runs for a second term, runs for the Senate, runs for President or runs for the hills, I will support her. Mostly because I trust her instincts and I know she seeks God's guidance in her life.
I have little doubt that whoever the next Republican president is she will be part of the administration. I hope it is as the big cheese, but anybody would be foolish not to get her in the energy post.
Difficult times have made her stronger in the past, and it will work the same for her now. It sure is hard to watch. But, like I said she will always have my support.
Yeah, that's basically what Bennett said this morning. First of all, Bristol is 18 and made it clear she didn't even tell her mother about the interview until the day before. Also, I don't think it was done in the Palin home. It looked like a hotel room to me. But that aside, this is the guy who chastised Rush for saying he wants Obama to fail without even knowing the context of his argument and the same guy who goes out of his way to give Obama the benefit of the doubt. He and his sidekick, Seth, are still trying to push the meme that Obama is governing from the center because of some of his cabinet picks--Hillary being one of them. He even keeps saying that Obama should not have farmed out the stimulus bill to the far left in his party. News flash for Bennett: Obama IS the far left.
And don't even get me started on his condescending remarks about the governor taking a break from the media and focusing on Alaska. Last time I checked, that's EXACTLY what she's been doing. Greta went to her, not the other way around. Bennett is another RINO who seems to take pleasure in pointing fingers at those in his own party instead of getting tough with those on the left who want to bring this country to it's knees all in the name of socialism. Uggghh!
I realize that Bennett's wife is a big activist in the teen abstinence movement but his assertion that Governor Palin has set the movement back and should not comment on policy when she doesn't understand it, is absurd. Bristol gave the interview. Bristol was speaking as a teen in today's world. Why is the Governor being blamed for what her daugther says and believes? Is Bennett going to hold Obama to the hard-core communist beliefs of this fater? I doubt it.
I think I get what Bennett is rambling about, but he is off on a few things:
1. The Palins did not "allow or invite" Fox News into their home, Bristol herself, now an 18 year old adult wanted to do the interview and told her parents so.
2. I still don't see what her views as an 18 year old teen have to do with her mother's views on abstinence and contraception. Bristol is free to have her own views and they should in no way have bearing on her mother. Bottom line is she is being responsible and most of all chose LIFE for her child. Yes, maybe she and Levi should get married, but we don't know all of the circumstances behind that. Mr. Bennett should not speculate on that.
3. As for being in the "spotlight", I think Sarah has pretty much tried to stay out of it, how many media outlets have requested interviews and have been turned down by her office? It is the MSM chasing her, she is not looking for attention.
Tiny Dancer... I think you said it better than I did!!! Kudos!!!
Dear Mr.Bennett-
Please get your facts straight. The interview took place in a library in Fairbanks, not the family home in Wasilla or the governor's mansion in Juneau.
If you think Sarah and Todd were pleased to see Bristol pregnant at 17 then I have a deed to a certain bridge in NYC. They were speechless after hearing the news. Sarah said abstinence was the ideal. She also stated in the 06 debate that she wasn't afraid to teach that concept along with contraception.
Obviously, Bristol made a huge mistake but she didn't compound it. Motherhood at such a young age isn't glamorous. How many times did Bristol reiterate that or did you have selective hearing?
BTW, Bristol is now 18, a legal adult as far as I can tell. Responsible for her own deeds and mistakes. She has had to grow up fast. Levi was doing the responsible thing trying to learn a trade by getting into the electrician apprentriceship program up on the North Slope. That is until that cretin Dan Fagan had to hound him out of his job in an attempt to try and harm the Guv.
As far as them getting married, yes, I would like to see them married as well, but i want to see them get their lives together first. She has the immediate goal of getting her high school diploma in May and then applying for college, while taking care of the little Tripp as well as possibly working part-time. Levi is also working to complete his GED and working to save money for his family.
One last point, sometimes in life, "a roll of the dice" one way or the other can forever alter one's lifecourse. I think you get my meaning.
I hear you all when it comes to Bill Bennett's comments. They're tough to take. But, to be honest, I can see his point. However, I also feel sorry for the Guv. She didn't "authorize" this interview. Her 18 year old daughter sprung it on her.
To be perfectly honest (and I write this in the comment section and not in a main posting on this blog for a reason) I think Bristol Palin is a bit of a twit. I don't hold this against the Guv because I think Ronald Reagan's two kids by Nancy were complete idiots and Margaret Thatcher's son Mark was the definition of a disreputable son of a politician. I mean, Reagan's daughter posed in Playboy! What kind of message did that send, Bill? For that matter, what kind of message did your millions of dollars in gambling send?
These pundits zeroed in on Bristol's comment about abstinence, which could very well have been taken out of context because you have to deconstruct the little twit's "likes" and "you knows" to get to her message, and she actually said that she didn't want to discuss this issue. Maybe her personal opinion on this issue is separate from her mother's and should be respected as such -- just as Dick Cheney's daughter's opinion about gay marriage and gay couples raising kids is her personal opinion and might be separate from her parents'.
As for the marriage stuff, I agree it would be better if Bristol was married to the father of her child. I have a bigger problem with single motherhood than I do teen pregnancy because Ann Coulter has copiously documented the myriad social ills accompanying single motherhood. Ideally I think pregnant teens should give their babies up for adoption, but that was not really possible for the daughter of the governor of Alaska and the vice presidential candidate. So, Bristol had the baby and the whole family is pitching in to help. That's good. They don't expect any help from the government. That's better. Bristol said over and over that this is not an ideal situation and that teens should "wait ten years" until they are married and have a house of their own, an education, and a career. That's great. Bill Bennett and others zeroed in on the abstinence message instead of focusing on the good, better, and great things the little twit said.
My prediction: expect a press release in the coming days by the governor clarifying her position on abstinence education and single parenthood.
My desire: that Bristol Palin would henceforth STFU, finish high school, marry the moron who got her pregnant (assuming that he isn't a complete deadbeat), move out of her parents' house, and do something positive with her life to atone for the huge distraction her irresponsible behavior became in the 2008 election. What I really wish is that she had the brains and the integrity to say publicly, "I really screwed up." Pregnancy did not just "happen" to her. She made a conscious decision to engage in behavior that led to pregnancy.
I am a conservative who greatly admires Gov. Palin, but I am also an opinionated beotch, and so here's my opinion (if you haven't guessed it already): Bristol screwed up and she should please now shut up, shoulder her responsibility, and stop distracting us. Bristol, until you move out of your parents' house, I don't want to hear from you. And even after that, I don't really want to hear from you. I half suspect that someday I will be seeing you anchoring a show on MSNBC with "Non" Reagan, Jr.
Now, Piper, Track, Willow, and Trig... they all seem like great kids.
Why are people dissecting every word that Bristol said? This was her first interview and it's possible she wasn't able to fully articulate her position because she was nervous. The reason that Bristol gave the interview was because she wants to prevent teen pregnancy, and Sarah said she is proud of daughter for wanting to take on an advocacy role. Bristol said that all teens should strive for abstinence, but it's unrealistic that every teen is going to. Some will choose abstinence and some will not, and in the case of the latter there should be a plan to prevent teen pregnancy. I think her intentions are good in that she is willing to risk ridicule by being interviewed in order to share her story in the hopes of preventing teen pregnancy.
Yeah, I agree with Ramrocks when it comes to Bristol. I'm sure she is a very sweet girl but a natural in front of the camera she is not. I'm not exactly sure who initiated this interview--her or Greta--but it was painful to watch. She seemed very uncomfortable at times and so did Greta for that matter. I know she's only 18 and her maturity will come in time but she comes across as very introverted and lacking in the communication skills that seem to come so naturally to her mother--and even to her 8 year old sister, LOL! I would imagine Bristol and probably Willow as well take after their father who also comes across as somewhat shy and introverted. Just my 2 cents of course.
ramrocks-
Ok, I'm gonna have to politely and civilly disagree on something with you. I don't think all teenage moms should give up their children for adoption. Some girls never get over the loss of the child once they have given it up for adoption. Depending upon the circumstances and also the individual should determine the decision. jmho.
I do agree however that Bristol's main focus from here on out is to get her life in order. Complete high school, go to college, get a career going and make a good life together with Levi. BTW, I think she is a good mom to the little tyke. Look at some of her role models, the Cuda, Sally and her great-grandma Lena.
as i have class to get ready for i cant respond full except i had to say brilliant ramrocks, truly.
Sorry guys, i could not read all of the comments so if I am repeating something , I apologize.
Qualified? are you kidding me, she is the only one out there that is qualified, look what the hell we have now.
She gave us everything she had, I went to two rallys and stood with people that had hope, admiration, love and a longing for someone like Sarah to resuce us. She is my hero! We owe her. We need to continue to support her and throw down the idiots that smear her! I will never give up, I am in this for the long haul. Ramrocks,you rock too.
Clarification: I don't think Bristol is a twit because she appeared awkward on camera. I don't mind that at all. I think she's a twit because she didn't use the opportunity to say point-blank: "My behavior was irresponsible. I made a mistake." She danced around the issue and spoke about how hard raising a kid is and how teens should wait. Even worse was the unfortunate wording the Guv used when she said that if this can "happen" to Bristol, it can "happen to anyone." Well, it didn't just "happen" to her the way cancer "happens." Pregnancy doesn't just "happen." You have to engage in behavior that leads to pregnancy. Bristol did this, and she did it irresponsibly. Either she chose not to use contraception or she used it and it failed. We would need to know which it was in order to accurately assess her position on abstinence education because she is using her own experience as a basis for her argument and for her right to comment on the issue. She obviously did not want to discuss her personal experience on this detail, so she had no business using her experience as a basis for offering an opinion. In other words, she should have STFU.
Of course her mother is proud of her for taking on an advocacy role. Her mother would be proud of her for waking up in the morning and doing an adequate job getting through the day. Gov. Palin is a mamma grizzly. She would no doubt be outraged by my comments. I would expect that of her. I would expect that of my own mother. No matter how many stupid things I did, my mother still loved me and would have gone grizzly on anyone who attacked me. (Though my mother would have also chewed me out behind the scenes, and I hope and suspect that Gov. Palin does that to Bristol when we aren't looking.)
RPG, I'm sure you are right that adoption isn't right for everyone. I was speaking in broad-strokes. My opinion is based on the horror with which I read Ann Coulter's chapter on single motherhood in her new book "Guilty." Kids raised by single mothers have a huge disadvantage. Most of our cultural ills can be traced to kids raised by single moms. Teen mothers rarely marry the fathers of their children; hence, they become single mothers. Not good. But each situation is unique. I think the responsible thing for any teen mother to do is to decide what's best for the child, not herself. The child will almost invariably have a better future by being adopted into a two parent home. It's tough, but, hey, that's life. Bristol is right: the best thing to do is wait ten years!
ramrocks-
Upfront, I should have said you write some of the best blogs I have had the privilege to read. Yes, Bristol messed up - BIGTIME. Yes, it didn't just happen. Credit Greta with asking some tough questions but in a compassionate manner. Personally, I think she should have waited on the interview, but that is my opinion.
The Cuda is definitely the disciplinarian in the family, lol. And when she told Bristol, there had better be a gameplan to deal with this responsibly, oh I wouldn't have wanted to be in Bristol's shoes at that moment, yikes.
Unwed teenage pregnancy isn't the ideal under any circumstances. Let me be emphatically clear on that point.
RPG,
FWIT, me being a father to two girls, I think that it's easy for Dads to be easy on daughters, more firm on sons and the other way around.. (Mother being easy on sons, firm on daughters to some degree)
Dave-
From what I can gather, Track and Bristol are quite shy. Piper, on the other hand, she's naturally vivacious like her Mom. Willow seems like a gentle soul.
Trig- He is a beautiful angel. Chromosome #47 is his compassion gene. He is the light and glory of the our Lord.
BTW, both of my parents were hard on me and my sister, lol
I think Bristol is conflicted about admitting she made a mistake due to her new found maternal instincts and love for her child. Perhaps, she views regretting her behavior as regretting her child. She may have been intentionally avoiding wording that would have made it seem as if she was not up to the task of raising her child.
Anonymous, I hope you're right. But something tells me that the little twit doesn't view her irresponsible behavior as irresponsible. That really annoys me. She is the daughter of the Governor of Alaska. She should have known that her actions had consequences. She should have been respectful of the great honor given her family by the people who elected her mother. Perhaps what she meant by "kids should wait ten years" was "I should have waited" -- perhaps she just didn't word it properly. But I don't think so. I think she just thinks it was a "bummer" occurrence rather than bad judgment and behavior on her part.
In fact, the more I write about this the more pissed I become. You all know how much I admire the writing of RSM. Well, I agree with him on this issue. I agreed with him on it back when it broke in September when he was afraid that this little twit and her hockey-stud might have cost us the election. Of course, she didn't. But she was a terrible distraction and her irresponsible behavior tarnished her mother's image. She brought shame to her family, and where I come from that's something to be ashamed of.
Perhaps many years from now, she'll be big enough to recognize this and apologize for the distraction she became. (Yes, I know that sounds harsh. But when you live as a member of a "first family" you have an obligation to the public. With privileges come responsibilities. Bristol had the privilege of living as the Governor's daughter. She failed to live up to the responsibilities.)
Maybe she'll grow up and realized this. Even Patti Davis did... eventually.
It's really very simple folks; SARAH'S got.... IT!!!... and it covers a multitude things ie.. Looks, feelings, ideas, charisma, family, connectivity, style, substance etc. etc. etc. In other words everything admirable or maybe not so admirable depending on ones leanings but the most important fact is there is NO ONE NOT NOTICING HER EVERY MOVE!!... and that is not a bad thing.
She is like no other on the scene but not like the others she is grounded with a faith and purpose so grounded in serving with "A SERVANTS HEART OF GOLD".
OT:
What we really need right now, guys, is for someone to take Shocking Blue's "Venus" and put it to a Palin music video!
It just works, doesn't it? It's the theme song for the "It" Girl!
Come on, alexraye, I know you're just itching to do this...
ya seriouslee. montage to venus. asap.
PS. i asked a friend of mine to throw in her hat to do a Palin montage to the song (she mostly does soap opera montages). she said she could work on one this weekend but she'd like some feedback as to the overall feel we'd like to see as well as the clips and pics we'd like.
let me know here or email me: LBADEO@yahoo.com
oh and just saw this. and i dont know why i laughed so hard. lol.
Here it is: Palin quote on contraceptives from 2006 (KTOO): "No, I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception education, but abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don't have a problem with that."
howlroll, is that in any audio or video?
Lorna-
Go to KTOO.com, gavel to gavel, video archives and then click on the Republican debate from Aug 06 with Sarah, Binkley and Murkowski.
Videmus Omnia said...
"I got enraged at Bill O'Reilly last night. He was conflating Bristol Palin with that ridiculous "13-year-old Dad" story from England, and had a couple of liberal women sex educators on."
Hell Yeah!
That deviant scumbag should be the last person to be playing Moral Judge & Jury.
I agree with Ramrocks. Bristol should've admitted her irresponsibility and that she is terribly sorry for what she's putting her mother and family through with being in the spotlight and how she should've taken her role as First Daughter of Alaska more seriously. She just appeared very shy on camera and I can tell Greta is trying very hard to get her to talk.
thanks ReaganPalinGal!
Lorna-
Glad to be of service. I've only watched the debates about a dozen times!
Seriously, the more we learn about energy and other AK related issues the more the answers make sense. You understand a bit more as you watch and learn.
Palin learned valuable lessons through this campaign that will serve her well now and hopefully for her run in 2012. How could you be as trusting and opem after what she has been through. She needs time to lick her wounds and recover. She will be stronger because of all this and wiser too. I believe she will be our Reagan in 2012. She has 4 years to prepare and learn and recover. She is such an inspiration and the first politican I have really given a rats butt about whether they win or not. As Obama continues to look like the "Never actually governed anything before" that he is, we will really need Sarah in 2012.
Did anybody read this study?
A new article in the Journal of Experimental psychology makes the case that Sarah Palin's looks -- and the focus on them -- hurt her and John McCain in November's election.
. So at least in this sample, it was Republicans and independents who were internally debating Palin’s suitability for the job. The study suggests that their confidence in her abilities may have decreased the more they focused on her looks – and thus, in feminist terms, objectified her.
Palin doesn't have it and never will. If you think she does then please stick with her. In 2010 maybe realisation will dawn on you all. Consider issues such as intellect, education, ethical values, ethical track record when selecting your political leaders
gnome=troll..
same thing, only the size is different..
ad hominem comment with no supporting examples.. (because, you know, the guy is a gnome) just to bad mouth.
if you can give an example of how she governs by an example.. say, I don't like how she brought in charitable services to help those people in their off the grid villages and here is why, then we can talk.. until then,..
Troll.
Being found guilty of ethics violations. Trying to appoint an AG who is a sexist. Rejecting federal support for the education services then denying she had rejected it. Not understanding the role of VP, not being able to name a single newspaper she read. uhm...
So.. obviously, you do not follow this site..
Otherwise you would know most of that is either BS or lies. That's okay.. facts are stubborn things. don't want them to get in the way of your reality.
again, Gnome=Troll.
Most of it - OK what part is correct then?
Read this website.. you can figure out the rest..
Does your parent still hold your hand when you pee pee on the potty?
start at the top of the blog and start reading.
I have done. I have also read pretty much all of the left and right wing commentary on Palin as I regard her as an interesting figure to emerge during the last election.
The blog above this seems to be a set of excuses for her behaviour. It is interesting that the GOP seem to be dumping her now. I regret that because I want her to run against Obama in 2012.
The recycled attacks on Sarah have so far proven ineffective.
They have thrown this stuff at her for 10 long months and there she is, still standing tall like a colossus astride our political landscape and making politicians eagerly await her decision on her re-election for the governorship as the event that will determine their own political calculus.
Several events happened.
The crowd of 20,000 she attracted in NY to a non-national event is phenomenal. They also observed the crowd's enthusiasm.
It is not the curiosity or the celebrity nature of it, but genuine expression of love and support for Sarah. This had astounded her opponents of both parties.
Then followed quickly by the Letterman episode that stunned the left wing media. The shock of watching one of their very own, so sheepishly and abjectly apologizing to their most hated person.
Then came the Pew Research polls and the Kansas straw poll that show Sarah well ahead of her rivals.
You can feel their pain, both from the left wing and the GOP elites. They are all sickened by the recent development.
Consider that just a month or so ago Sarah was just ONE of the front runners. Just one of a cluster of three, and not so distinguishable from the Mitt and Huck.
But now she is way out in the front and so she is starting to receive all this incoming fire. I am not too worried about the attacks from the left wing as they have proven ineffective.
It is the Cassiuses and the Brutuses that are abound in the halls of the GOP that truly concerns me. Their knives are unsheathed. (I don't mean this to be in bloody term, this is referred to only as an analogy.)
Why has Sarah so upset the GOP elites?
In their war room they have run different scenarios of a Mitt or Huck or Newt matchups with Obama in 2012, and have come up with an optimistically contrived winning outcome.
But with Sarah they just cannot predict anything. To use a stock market term, the volatility index is off the chart when it involves Sarah. No past models to base anything on.
She is too UNCONVENTIONAL. She doesn't follow any rule book.
Hence, they cannot manage her, and therefore she has to be destroyed. They have not seen anyone like her. So out of the ordinary. So out-of-the-box. Who would give such strange names to their children?
Who could show such incredible self- confidence and poise when accepting the party's nomination in front of 40 million TV viewers?
To them, she has become so unearthly that they just couldn't fathom as to who she really is. And having lived for so many years in a political bubble that is insulated from the real life of regular folks, they just couldn't understand her.
So the knives are out for her. But Sarah still has friends in the GOP hierarchy who will be the "blind seer" to warn her.
And then, just maybe then, she will quit the party and form an independent third party and run a truly unconventional campaign.
Here's a thought experiment. Like a cosmologist postulating a hypothesis, I would propose a scenario where Sarah, as a third party presidential candidate, would concentrate her campaign in 5 to 7 swing states and capturing enough electoral votes to deny both parties the White House, thereby becomes the king maker.
Such an event would be a huge political tectonic shift that her power as the eminence grise would propel her to presidency in 2016 as she rejoins a tamed and chastened GOP.
Out-of-the-box? Maybe.
VIVA SARAH!
I get confused with all the Reagan refrences when nuclear policy was nuclear weapon reduction? Obama signed an agreement for 1/3 reduction in nuclear weapons, for which he was critized by Mrs. Palin, FOX, and really every Republican, was the exact same policy Ronald Reagen started.
This is copied from the agreement, it completely protects the US "Given<span></span> the<span></span> catastrophic<span></span> potential<span></span> of<span></span> biological<span></span> weapons<span></span> and<span></span> the<span></span> rapid<span></span> pace<span></span> of<span></span> bio-technology<span></span> development,<span></span> the<span></span> United<span></span> States<span></span> reserves<span></span> the<span></span> right<span></span> to<span></span> make<span></span> any<span></span> adjustment<span></span> in<span></span> the<span></span> assurance<span></span> that<span></span> may<span></span> be<span></span> warranted<span></span> by<span></span> the<span></span> evolution<span></span> and<span></span> proliferation<span></span> of<span></span> the<span></span> biological<span></span> weapons<span></span> threat<span></span> and<span></span> U.S.<span></span> capacities<span></span> to<span></span> counter<span></span> that<span></span> threat"
Also, While on Hannity, Newt and Hannity flat out lie saying Newst -If someone attacks us with biological weapon and kills over a million people this President is saying we wont retaliate?
Hannity - Thats what he said
Newt - I agree thats what he said
All pure facts and flat out lies
<span>I get confused with all the Reagan refrences when nuclear policy was nuclear weapon reduction? Obama signed an agreement for 1/3 reduction in nuclear weapons, for which he was critized by Mrs. Palin, FOX, and really every Republican, was the exact same policy Ronald Reagen started.
This is copied from the agreement, it completely protects the US "Given<span></span> the<span></span> catastrophic<span></span> potential<span></span> of<span></span> biological<span></span> weapons<span></span> and<span></span> the<span></span> rapid<span></span> pace<span></span> of<span></span> bio-technology<span></span> development,<span></span> the<span></span> United<span></span> States<span></span> reserves<span></span> the<span></span> right<span></span> to<span></span> make<span></span> any<span></span> adjustment<span></span> in<span></span> the<span></span> assurance<span></span> that<span></span> may<span></span> be<span></span> warranted<span></span> by<span></span> the<span></span> evolution<span></span> and<span></span> proliferation<span></span> of<span></span> the<span></span> biological<span></span> weapons<span></span> threat<span></span> and<span></span> U.S.<span></span> capacities<span></span> to<span></span> counter<span></span> that<span></span> threat"
Also, While on Hannity, Newt and Hannity flat out lie saying Newst -If someone attacks us with biological weapon and kills over a million people this President is saying we wont retaliate?
Hannity - Thats what he said
Newt - I agree thats what he said
All pure facts and flat out lies</span>
Post a Comment