Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Expenses: Palin v. Murkowski; UPDATED: AP Story and Mr. Bill's Press Conference



Click to Enlarge


SOURCE

Click to Enlarge


SOURCE

UPDATE by VO: Mr. Nine Percent is blogging that Palin will have a press conference about the expense issues this week. Glad to see some pushback from the Guv against the smear campaign.

UPDATE BY JR: Will Mr. Nine Percent cut up the audio from this one too?

UPDATE by Ramrocks:

The AP
reports on Gov. Palin's release of the comparison of her expenses to Murkowski and Knowles:

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — Gov. Sarah Palin's office on Monday defended the governor's practice of collecting per diem from the state while living at her home in Wasilla, saying she was costing the state a lot less than her predecessor.

Spokesman Bill McAllister held a press conference comparing Palin's expenses with those of fellow Republican, former Gov. Frank Murkowski.

During her first two years in office, Palin charged the state almost $18,000 for meal allowances while living in Wasilla and commuting 40 miles to her office in Anchorage. But McAllister said Palin spent $100,000 less than Murkowski spent living in the governor's mansion in Juneau, the state capital, during his last two years in office.

"It's a different kind of expense. It hasn't been calculated this way before because previous governors have not spent that much time away from the mansion. But the fact of the matter is in terms of the amount of money, she is charging the state much less," McAllister said.

Sen. Kim Elton, D-Juneau, said the governor's staff was comparing "the $17,000 apple to the $100,000 orange."

"First I want to see how that $100,000 adds up and secondly, I guess I'm skeptical about whether she would be living in the mansion if she weren't able to collect per diem at home," Elton said.

"Yes, $17,000 is less than $100,000 but $17,000 is a lot higher than zero. And if she's going to work out of her home in Wasilla, the choice is between zero and $17,000 and not $17,000 and $100,000."

Actually, no, Kim. It doesn't. As I noted in my earlier post on per diems, Gov. Palin could not have stayed at the mansion all of those days because it was undergoing extensive renovations. She saved the state money by staying in her own home and only charging for meal per diems for herself. She didn't charge per diems for her husband or her children, though she was legally entitled to do so. She could have had the state put her family up in a hotel or apartment while the renovations were going on. That would have been wildly more expensive than her meal per diems.

The AP continues:

Palin's practice of charging the state per diem became known after she was named John McCain's running mate on the Republican presidential ticket late last August.

It became a campaign issue after she was presented to the nation as a fiscal conservative.

No, actually the per diem issue was never hidden. It was first mentioned when KTUU reported back in 2007 that Gov. Palin had decided to spend the non-legislative session months working out of her Anchorage office.

And she is a fiscal conservative:

McAllister said Palin has been frugal in other ways as well. He said expense reports for per diem, lodging and travel for the governor and her husband, Todd Palin, in 2007 and 2008 show a savings of more than $900,000 compared to Murkowski's last two years in office.

Over two-thirds of that amount was attributable to Murkowski's use of the state jet. Palin had the jet sold when she took office and travels either on commercial flights or in the Department of Public Safety's 1980 twin-engine King Air.

An unspoken aspect of this whole per diem issue is the old argument about having the location of the capital in Juneau instead of in Willow (closer to Anchorage). The capital is the official residence of the governor. But Anchorage is the business center of Alaska. It's also the largest population center and is easy to get to. Juneau is not as accessible. The debate about the state capital is an old and hotly contested issue among Alaskans. I'll let them hash it out. I'm just clueing my fellow Lower 48ers in on the back-story.

UPDATE by Mel: You can hear the audio of Mr. Bill's entire press conference here. In addition to discussing per diems (and other expenses), Mr. Bill mentioned that the governor "is relinquishing the state vehicle she's been using and will be driving her own car." And her security staff isn't happy about it:

The governor intends to start driving her own car, Cockrell said, adding that he isn't pleased with the decision because her car -- a Volkswagen Jetta -- is small and not as safe as the state rig.

17 comments:

Anonymous,  February 23, 2009 8:11 PM  

hahaha

'Cuda is certainly running for re-election; I think she's waiting for Frenchie to declare his intention so she can declare the next day which would elevate Frenchie in the eyes of the small but vocal liberal base in Alaska and allow him to clear the field.

Even Knowles is spending a ton more than 'Cuda. I'd like to see this comparison done with every governor (contrast with their predecessor) to show that 'Cuda is one of the most frugal governors.

Anonymous,  February 23, 2009 8:28 PM  

So this means Palin will wait until 2016? It seems so far away :(

Anonymous,  February 23, 2009 8:30 PM  

I'm guessing fellow anonymous poster that she will step down if she decides to run....

manajordan February 23, 2009 8:32 PM  

That certainly makes things clear. The per diem thing has saved the state quite a bit of money when in place of lodging.

Doug Brady February 23, 2009 8:36 PM  

I don't suppose this information has been published in the ADN. It certainly appears that the ADN's beloved Tony Knowles spent a lot more money than Sarah too.

Anonymous,  February 23, 2009 9:04 PM  

My guess is that Sarah is playing French like a fish on a hook.

French's first choice is to run for Governor but he doesn't want to run against Sarah. If Sarah runs for Governor, French will likely run for the US Senate or US House.

I think Sarah knows this so she probably won't announce her intentions until September. This is not a problem for her as she will be able to raise all the funds she needs in a short period of time, either for the Governor's race or the Senate Race.

However, if French waits until Sarah declares in September he looses 6 months of fund raising time - which will really hurt him in either of the three races.

As I said, Sarah is playing him like a fish on a hook!!!

Videmus Omnia February 23, 2009 9:19 PM  

French has a big chit from the DNC for his Troopergate garbage, and is undoubtedly looking for the place to play it.

He probably got a commitment from them for campaign funding in return for delivering his BS "October Surprise".

ReaganPalinGal,  February 23, 2009 9:20 PM  

JR-

You are so cynical! I hope that Mr. 9% will change his ways and not play edited audio of Guv Palin or anyone else for that matter on his show.

I wonder if it will be on KTOO.com or KTUU.com this time.

Anonymous,  February 23, 2009 9:50 PM  

VO - if French runs for Governor the maximum the DNC can give him is $500. (Outside PACs, paries and individuals cannot contribute more than $500) In total, a gubenatorial candidate in Alaska cannot raise more than $20,000 out of state. Alaska election law is very strict about ensuring "outsiders" cannot influence Alaska's elections.

Now if French runs for the US House or US Senate - that is an entirely different matter. Then I would agree with you the DNC is likely to pay back in a big way.

Videmus Omnia February 23, 2009 9:53 PM  

Anon, thanks for the tip. I would guess that 'Cuda will probably raise her $20,000 from out of state in the first fifteen minutes after she puts a donation link up on her website.

Anonymous,  February 24, 2009 12:07 AM  

So I'm not sure why I'm surprised, upon looking at this info I was like "well they can't have much to say about that, now can they?"

I was clearly wrong.

AP's absurd take.

narciso February 24, 2009 12:35 AM  

The AP gets it wrong again, can they not read charts, or is their PDS so advanced, well they went to Kim Elton, I guess Hollis French wasn't available

Shane Vander Hart February 24, 2009 12:47 AM  

This does put the whole per diem thing into perspective even thought I thought she was saving the state in other areas

But not that much - wow she is certainly being frugal.

To the Anonymous person who thinks that by running for re-election she will wait until 2016. Not necessarily - being just a one term governor won't be an asset. I think a lot will depend on the political landscape in 2011.

I know I've read some who have commented that they would like to see her run for Senate - I think that would be a mistake. I think it would be best for her to stay out of Washington.

Anonymous,  February 24, 2009 1:25 AM  

"Common sense fiscal responsibility"
"fiscal restraint"
"fiscal prudence"
"hold me accountable"

Walk the walk, talk the talk!

Videmus Omnia February 24, 2009 8:03 AM  

A Volkswagen? Expect a huge scandal because she doesn't drive an American car.

I wish I was kidding.

Emerson C,  February 24, 2009 8:08 AM  

I am not so sure that Governor Palin should respond at all to all the ankle biting about her Governatal expenses. What her detractors are really saying is: "its not really about the money, its that Sarah Palin is not worth it". By striving to be very frugal, including such moves as driving her own small car the Governor may be playing into their hands. She should buy a bigger state car, buy a new jet, rehire the Governor's chef and proclaim to the world; "I'm worth it". But she is too honest to do that. As a recent post in the British Daily Telegraph noted; "there is no side to her".

Lorna Marie February 24, 2009 5:11 PM  

video

http://www.teamsarah.org/video/bill-mcallister-defends-gov

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP