Friday, February 20, 2009

No Surprise: WaPo Distorts Per Diem Tax Issue; UPDATE: The Role of the Juneau Mansion Renovations in the Per Diem Saga



Scroll down for updates!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm sure most readers here are already familiar with the latest Palin smear - the issue of income tax on per diem payments. This was the subject of not one, but two huge threads on Hot Air yesterday.

James Grimaldi of the Washington Post published an article in today's edition titled "Palin Now Owes Taxes on Payments for Nights at Home, State Rules". The article distorts the issue and omits key facts.

First of all, the headline itself is a distortion. Palin never claimed per diem "for nights at home" - she's never claimed any reimbursement for lodging when she stayed in Wasilla. She only ever requested per diem for meals when working away from her official duty station in Juneau.

The article also omits a key fact in this story - it was Governor Palin herself who ordered the review of the tax policy. This fact was even admitted by the Anchorage Daily News' top Trig Truth researcher, Lisa Demer, in the ADN's article on this story:

"At the Governor's request, we reviewed the situation to determine whether we were in full compliance with the pertinent Internal Revenue Service regulations," [state administration commissioner Annette] Kreitzer wrote. "As a result of this review, we determined that per diem needs to be treated as income, requiring a revision of W-2 forms for any affected employees." (emphasis added)

Mr. Grimaldi may be contacted via this form. The ombudsman for the Washington Post, Mr. Andy Alexander, may be contacted at http://www.blogger.com/ombudsman@washpost.com.

UPDATE: Another shocker - derangement on the op-ed page of the ADN. The unsigned editorial contains this gem:

Alaskans don't know if she owes or has paid taxes on the clothes and grooming services she received during her vice-presidential campaign.

Say what? What color is the sky in Pat Dougherty's world? As a commenter on the editorial notes: "Get real ADN. Do movie stars pay income taxes on their grooming and costumes on a set? Certainly not! ADN, get a clue."

My only consolation is that the ADN is fading fast. The excellent blog McClatchy Watch has the stock value for their parent company dropping to 50 cents a share.



UPDATE by Ramrocks:

A "legislative insider" called into the Eddie Burke radio show this evening to explain the role that the renovations of the governor's mansion played in the per diem story. He said that the 90-something year old mansion was greatly in need of repairs in order to make it serviceable as a chief executive's home (i.e., able to function as a venue for hosting dinners, receptions, etc., as well as be habitable for a family with children).

With all of these renovations underway, the governor could have forced the state to pay for her lodging (in a hotel or an apartment) in Juneau or in Anchorage. Instead she lived in her house in Wasilla and saved the state thousands of dollars by only requesting meal per diems. That's right. She asked for meal per diems, not lodging per diems. And she didn't claim any per diems for her kids or her husband, though she was legally entitled to.

In
her post-election interview with the ADN, Gov. Palin noted the role the renovations played in per diem requests:

Q. One of the things that came up during the campaign is that you charge the state per diem for time spent here in Wasilla. Is that something you are going to continue to do?

PALIN: We've always followed the law and fully disclosed all that. The choice there in many months of the Juneau mansion being re-plumbed and all the improvements being made in the infrastructure of the Juneau house, where we weren't going to be there anyway. Knowing that in the end it would have cost the state more money to do what other governors had done and that is either charge the state for hotel rooms. Or the state rents you an apartment like they did for Governor Murkowski. We said no, we just won't sell our house, knowing that we're going to spend quite a bit of time here, especially those months where the remodels were taking place in the governor's mansion. And we would disclose my per diem, we wouldn't try to hide it ... trying to go above and beyond, not accepting any per diem for the kids or Todd at all, they've lived outside of the governor's house. Trying to follow the rules and doing what is legal and ethical and full disclosure.

The ADN's Alaska Ear column also noted the extensive renovations going on at the governor's mansion just before the Christmas open house last December:

When the Palins moved in there were all of a sudden lots of leaks and stuff cause a real family was living there.

The open house has been a tradition for 93 years, with two years off during World War II, said Erica Fagerstrom, the residence manager.

She was happy the home was in shape for the thousands of guests. The mansion has undergone extensive plumbing renovations.

"This place was a construction zone three weeks ago," she said.

In October 2007, the Juneau Empire ran a photo story on the renovation work:

Workers are replacing the 95-year-old building's antiquated plumbing system and are generating lots of dust as they remove old pipes. The first phase of construction is scheduled to be completed in December. The second phase will be done next year.

So, there you have it, folks. Case closed.

Update by VO: Hey, JR - did you know that in 1967, Nancy Reagan refused to live in the Governor's Mansion in Sacramento, calling the place a fire trap? The Reagans moved into their own place and converted the mansion into a museum.

JR: I think the Trumans also faced a similar situation when moving into the White House. New Jersey may have a crappy governor, but we have the best governor's mansion:

16 comments:

promachus,  February 19, 2009 10:44 AM  

Expect more nonsense to follow.

promachus,  February 19, 2009 10:53 AM  

OK. Shot off an email to the reporter. Included this:

I would hope that you'd take the opportunity to correct your article and save your newspaper's diminishing reputation for fairness.

JR February 19, 2009 11:21 AM  

my email is on the way

Anonymous,  February 19, 2009 11:22 AM  

Emailed Grimaldi and Alexander to make your "missing key fact" point.
RH

Anonymous,  February 19, 2009 12:57 PM  

I was looking through 'Cuda's travel/per diem report form for December and it indicates that she had a conversation with Dirty Harry Reid in that month.

Think she may try to get the money allotted for the pipeline in the energy plan that Reid is going to release in a couple months; he's calling it a renawable energy portfolio.

Cannot think of any other reason why she would talk to Reid; let's hope she gets it in there because the bill will likely be trash otherwise. A federal renawable energy portfolio? Why not just leave it to the states to determine the best way to go with their energy resources.

Lorna Marie February 20, 2009 4:33 AM  

ew really she talked to reid? blech. you'd think murk would do the senate negotiating...

colin,  February 20, 2009 10:40 PM  

I left an email as well. lol it was a good one.

colin,  February 20, 2009 11:00 PM  

On a side note, I went to netscape's main page, and on it says "Which person called America a Nation of Cowards." And they went on to show a picture of Bill O'Reilly, Eric Holder, and Sarah. As if to suggest, that people should be surprised that it was neither Bill or Sarah. It's just so annoying when they try to not so subtley imply something.

Anonymous,  February 20, 2009 11:08 PM  

Guys,

Ya gotta check this out:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/02/montana-governo.html

Schweitzer is going after the 'Cuda for "no-showing" the NGA conference. This is unbelievable. What is he trying to do, play to his base for 2016?

This requires a new post for sure.

Anonymous,  February 20, 2009 11:11 PM  

Schweitzer:

"I don't know where she's going to be. You'll be stuck with me," Schweitzer told ABC News. "There will be no glamour, certainly no snappy dressing. I brought my best two pairs of jeans. There's a little bit of a horse s**t stain by the knee. But I've been washing that stuff out."

Palin and Schweitzer, a rancher-turned-politician, are the chairwoman and vice chairman, respectively, of the NGA's Natural Resources Committee.

The panel is holding a 2 p.m. ET discussion Sunday on "Energy Infrastructure: Vital for a 21st Century Economy." The panel will hear from two energy experts: Pat Wood III, a principal with Wood3 Resources, and Jesse Berst, the managing director of GlobalSmartEnergy.com.

For weeks, the NGA's published agenda has touted the Palin-Schweitzer panel as hosting the 90-minute discussion with Wood and Berst.

Palin, however, did not publicly commit about attending the NGA conference.

Her office announced Thursday that her travel to western Alaska coupled with her work on budget amendments and "economic stimulus certification requirements" would prevent her from attending this weekend's NGA meeting, which includes not only the energy policy discussion but also a Sunday black tie dinner at the White House and a Monday governors-only meeting with President Barack Obama.

"I don’t have any party buying me clothes," said Schweitzer, referring to the more than $150,000 that the Republican Party shelled out for the Palin family's wardrobe last year. "My wife buys my clothes at Costco."

Hahahaha, this guy doesn't even have anything original; does he have a crush on the 'Cuda? She must be pretty darn valuable if Schweitzer is bitching about her non-attendance.

davek70 February 20, 2009 11:22 PM  

Of course the comments on the ABC news blog are snarky at Palin as usual. It amazes me how brainwashed the general public is by the MSM. It's the usual stuff... clothes, taxes, per diem, the same ol crap that has been debunked over and over and over again. I will give some props to a few posters on there who defended the Guv.

Please mods.... post this blog entry from ABC news and debunk AGAIN the negative comments below the blog entry w/ your crack research!!

Anonymous,  February 20, 2009 11:36 PM  

Don't worry about comments sections; those are completely irrelevant. Only the most obsessed like us post on blogs, we aren't swing voters. Polls are what matter more and those need to be debunked when taken by an inaccurate pollster or put forward when an accurate pollster presents a positive result.

Polls are more important than comments on a blog in my opinion

promachus,  February 21, 2009 12:12 AM  

Remember the GOP congressional retreat also trashed her. What's wrong with these morons? I don't see them getting so uptight if other politicians don't attend events.

There seems to be a lot of animus against her in the power circles. That's not good.

LindaW,  February 21, 2009 1:55 AM  

Wow, New Jersey definitely has the most beautiful governor's mansion. The CA governor's mansion is quite ugly. I've seen it once. I don't like the neighborhood or street that it's on. I can't imagine our Governator living there.

Lorna Marie February 21, 2009 2:12 AM  

wow that is a snazzy governor's mansion!...sad ive never seen our own gov mansion lol (CA)

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP