Wednesday, March 25, 2009

UPDATED: Legislature Will Do What They Do Best... Waste Money



The ADN reports:

JUNEAU -- Top Alaska legislators said Tuesday they're likely to accept at least most of the federal economic stimulus money that Gov. Sarah Palin did not.

"I think at the end of the day we will end up taking most of the funds," said Anchorage Republican Rep. Mike Hawker, who is leading the House effort on the stimulus as co-chairman of the finance committee.

Senate Majority Leader Johnny Ellis agreed. "I would be surprised if we give up much or any of the federal money," the Anchorage Democrat said.

[...]

Legislators said they are worried that, if they do accept the money, Palin will either veto parts of it or simply not fill out the necessary paperwork to receive it. Two Anchorage Democratic senators, including Senate Judiciary Chairman Hollis French, questioned if the state can even legally get the money if Palin doesn't expressly request it, although that's not the prevailing view among their colleagues.

Palin will not rule out vetoes. But her budget director, Rehfeld, said state agencies are continuing to do the paperwork necessary to ensure Alaska does not miss deadlines if the Legislature accepts the money.

One argument going on in the Capitol is about what strings are attached to the money. Rehfeld told legislators that up to 25 percent of the money Palin didn't accept could have strings that require a change in state policy. Some involves an increase in the eligibility for unemployment benefits.

C4P has brought to your attention the shenanigans of some members of the Alaska Legislature, specifically Hollis French, Kim Elton, Jay Ramras and Beth Kerttula. We really need to add Mike Hawker to this list. It seems that he takes the opposite stand of Governor Palin on nearly every issue. His comment in the recent AGIA hit piece is just staggering: "The only thing standing in the way of an Alaska gas pipeline is the Sarah Palin administration." Hawker represents the Murkowski wing of the GOP and all that comes with it, which includes secret tax negotiations with the oil companies and VECO campaign contributions and goodies. This wing of the Alaska GOP represents the worst of "crony capitalism." Hawker was a supporter of former Governor Murkowski's "PPT Tax," which was conducted behind closed doors, without much input from the rest of the legislature.

UPDATE by VO: One of the names you see all over the articles about the legislature and the stimulus is Larry Persily, who now works as a staffer for Mike Hawker. There are a few things you should know about Persily. He's a former editor at both the Anchorage Daily News and the Juneau Empire, two staunchly anti-Palin papers. Despite that, he briefly worked for the Palin administration as a staffer in the Washington, D.C. legislative liaison office, until he was replaced by Palin last May with Russ Kelly.

After losing his Washington gig, Persily seems to have gone on an anti-Palin tear - especially after Palin was nominated for VP. Here he is in Bloomberg on August 31st, saying she's not qualified. He appears in a tinfoil-hat hit piece in the Guardian in October. He even wrote for the Huffington Post, and after the election he appeared on Alaskan Public Radio to slam Palin and spin the election results against her.

His most recent national media appearance was in this week's issue of People magazine, where he was quoted as saying "Palin is like Evita Peron." So spare us your wonkery, Larry - we know you're sore about losing your Washington job, and that anything Palin is for, you're against, and anything Palin is against, you're for.

27 comments:

wisetrog March 25, 2009 10:05 AM  

Didn't Sean Parnell say that the Governor retains the option of vetoing it or not filling the paperwork? I think it'd be awesome if she just allowed the deadline to pass without doing anything.

Mike Hawker is added to my hit list. I'll start practising Cruciatus curse on him.

Greg March 25, 2009 10:21 AM  

I've become one of those who don't think it would be a good idea for Gov. Palin to run for reelection. What would be the point in putting herself through more of the same, "ethics complaints," huge legal bills, political enemies in both dem and rep parties, an enemy press. Step down in Dec 2010 after one term. Go on a nationwide speaking tour, and build a huge grassroots organization. Write a book, part autobiographical, part behind the scenes of the campaign, but mostly a review of where America has been, where it is, and her vision of where it should go from here. Bypass a publisher altogether, sell it for $10 a download in PDF format, little overhead, mostly profit. It would become an overnight sensation, maybe even making her that once rumored $11 million and not enriching some publisher who would probably make big donations to 0bama anyway. She could donate a big chunk of the money to charity, and get her family situated financially.

But, first things first. Raise a lot of money for SarahPAC so that she becomes a financial powerhouse in 2010. It would be great to see a steady stream of republican hopefulls making the trip to Alaska to kiss her ring, ask for endorsement, and beg for money. Since she won't be running for reelection in 2010,she could come to the lower 48, and campaign for 2, 3 or 4 weeks, essentially kicking off her 2012 campaign.

Jenny March 25, 2009 10:22 AM  

I hope Sarah does the veto. Enough of the BS from the legislature. Screw them!

Tob March 25, 2009 10:28 AM  

Tammy Bruce talking about Sarah Palin .

http://v3.player.abacast.com/player/player.php?pid=eldorado_kixw

hrh March 25, 2009 10:29 AM  

Tammy Bruce on for Laura Ingraham right now talking about Gov Palin's 500,000 legal fees!!

She just mentioned the coat issue and calling out liberals for doing it not to get her impeached but to bankrupt her.

Mentions the soap opera character ...

Tammy says "it could work."

hrh March 25, 2009 10:33 AM  

Now she mentioned the defense fund, and said she'll be posting it at www.tammybruce.com and twittering it.

The good gov has some high-profile defenders! Getting the word out. She also made it clear that all of the complaints other than Tasergate happened since 8/29.

Wonder if Rush mentions it?

Re: Hannity talking about the polling last night; I don't think he got to it. I admit I dozed off a bit during the Obama gabfest, but I was awake for the panel and it went right to the top of the hour.

I'm actually kind of glad 'cause Fox has put out misinformation about Palin and I suspect Hannity would have just assumed it's SarahPac doing it, and I'm not yet convinced of that.

Just like Laura Ingraham last week letting the Politico guy get a last shot at Palin before the break

wisetrog March 25, 2009 10:37 AM  

I am glad Hannity didn't let the cat out of the bag. She doesn't need any of these national race stuff until the legislative session is over.

narciso March 25, 2009 10:38 AM  

Greg, it's a nice thought, but you've seen the outline of the plan, to drive her from public
life entirely. It's because she fights, for America's legacy of liberty and free enterprise, as no one has since Reagan. If she choses
not to run again, it will be imputed that she had something to hide. If Parnell doesn't win, it will be held against her, in the primaries. I guess if she doesn't run, for either office, I'll resign my self to voting for someone, but it will be proof that the vote doesn't mean anything anymore.

K. Carpenter March 25, 2009 10:40 AM  

You beat me to the punch JR. What is clearly evident in this article is that the legislators plan on accepting the money. They have no clue whether or not strings are attached. They have no idea whether or not Palin can veto them. They have no idea what the money can and cannot be used for.

These legislators are just grabbing money, consequences be damned!

Do you remember the comic showing a bunch of kids in the stimulus candy store?

Well, the legislators, including the Republicans, are on a sugar high and have no clue what they are grabbing for, they are just grabbing.

IAmGrateful March 25, 2009 11:06 AM  

I watched Hannity and no, he never did get to the polling issue - perhaps he thought it best not to report it until he verifies that it is indeed Palin authorizing it?

hrh March 25, 2009 11:10 AM  

Tammy Bruce again talking about Sarah and her progress despite the lawsuits. She thinks the Iowa polling must be from SarahPac. I wish whoever is doing them would go public so we know ...

Now talking about the MSM hiding the John Edwards story.

Uh oh, talking about an AK blogger, could that be mudflats, ugh!

hrh March 25, 2009 11:13 AM  

Focusing on the "how important is second term as governor" to say that SarahPac is doing the poll ...

Because AK is not a media hub. Interesting.

TB won't send money until she gets position papers on issues, like immigration ... plus TB is pro-choice.

IAmGrateful March 25, 2009 11:15 AM  

Listening to Tammy Bruce (filling in for Laura Ingraham) right now - she's talking about the robocalls for Palin.


Some of the questions that she's reading from the robocall:

1. Do you have a favorable opinion of Gov. Palin?

2. Do you think it's important that Gov. Palin is re-elected as Governor of Alaska?

Tammy seems to think that the 2nd question is extremely insightful - thinks Palin is behind these robocalls and is trying to find out if she needs to be re-elected in order to do win the 2012 primary.

Tammy says she will not send her any money until she finds out more about her platform.

Wants her to have faith to influence in decisions BUT is worried that she may legislate from her faith.

She likes her and wants to support her, and is waiting to watch her form policy.

Reiterates that these calls are "clearly coming from the Palin camp".

That's all - sorry if disjointed - typing quickly.

IAmGrateful March 25, 2009 11:16 AM  

Bruce just said the Bush machine is pushing Bobby Jindal over Sarah Palin and that is a mistake.

She said Jindal will follow their orders and Palin will not.

hrh March 25, 2009 11:19 AM  

Techno, you need a transcript of Tammy's talk, she sounds like you: that Palin should travel, speak, promote a book. Ha Ha!

Uh oh, now she's quoting that poll that gives Obama a 55 to 35 win over Palin, but not saying that it polled 44% Dems and 33% Repubs.

And she said it's a shame that in another poll only 11% of Dems like her and she calls that a shame speaking as a prochoice former President of NOW. She says it shows the failure of the media.

Tammy is such a fascinating independent thinker.

wisetrog March 25, 2009 11:27 AM  

It's the same Bush machine that threw a snit under Reagan and wouldn't let it go until he selected Poppy as VP.

Hmm. Maybe that's why Jindal rejected Mccain because he was being advised by the Bush machine? Bears thinking. RSM too was worried about the Bush machine.

As much as I love GWB, I don't want his hangers-on to have so much influence in world politics.

hrh March 25, 2009 11:34 AM  

I believe the Bush machine is behind Kay Bailey Hutchinson in TX. So Palin coming out for Perry puts her at direct odds with them.

But then in her Lincoln Day Dinner speech, she gave an impassioned shout-out to President Bush! As she did in her State of the State.

She's about as independent a thinker as Tammy Bruce ...

Torrey March 25, 2009 11:37 AM  

If the majority of Alaskans are really serious about not accepting all of the stimulus money, shouldn't they do something to let the legislature know? Or does the Alaska legislature not care what the people think?

hrh March 25, 2009 11:46 AM  

Huh, Tammy just said that maybe McCain/Palin lost because Palin is destined to be President. :)

manajordan March 25, 2009 12:08 PM  

Tammy Bruce is a fascinating person to listen to. She has great insight into Liberal thinking. She is a huge fan of Sarah Palin. She talks about her all the time. I loved the line about maybe McCain lost because Sarah is destined to become president.
Wisetrog, the Cruciatus curse is unforgiveable, maybe go for the bat bogey hex instead :)

Mel March 25, 2009 12:18 PM  

KC,

You should post your comment as an update on the main post.

TommyReport,  March 25, 2009 12:20 PM  

HRH,

An Iowa news network allegedly "confirmed" that it was Palin's PAC behind the poll...I put up the link last night. My question though is how the heck did it "confirm?" Did Meg Stapleton say yes, we are behind the poll, hahahah? I find that hard to believe...

My bet is that Americans in Contact PAC is behind the polling but that they are polling with Palin's full-knowledge and support. However, having AIC PAC do it gives her plausible deniability.

techno March 25, 2009 12:36 PM  

hrh:

I am just a simpleton and not in the intellectual prowess of a feminist lioness like Tammy Bruce. All I have tried to do is to bring to Sarah's potential bid for the Presidency in 2012 a semblance of earthy realism that does not sugarcoat reality.

I knew I would be attacked when I first proposed my strategy for Sarah, if she did indeed pursue the Presidency. It is certainly not 'conservative' in approach, but unconventional and unorthodox in strategy.

Of course I knew the risk of Sarah being rejected by primary voters for only a one-term governor; that is why the current robo-poll now being conducted in Iowa and NH includes a question that pertains to this issue.

narciso March 25, 2009 12:51 PM  

No, I don't recall we attacked you Techno, in fact you upbraided me for me being practically minded,
your theory is an extrapolation of past historical trends. Which I can give you second hand view of
this, because of my family's experience in Cuba, if myreferences
were not clear enough. If their goal is to drive her from public life, as we concur to give up her
chance at running for Governor, will be considered a victory. If Parnell doesn't win, that will be counted against her.

SarahPac is too rudimentary at this point, to be conducting these polls, AIC is probably doing this,
and the local press is either misreading this or more likely
misrepresenting this effort. Which seems more likely

Jody March 25, 2009 1:40 PM  

Over at the News Miner Dermot Cole has a post Alaska and the Stimulus Law

Here is the latest analysis of the federal stimulus law prepared by Larry Persily, an aide to the House Finanace Committee

http://www.newsminer.com/weblogs/dermot-cole/2009/mar/25/alaska-and-the-stimulus-law/

Scroll down and check out the comments by the first 2 people

TommyReport,  March 25, 2009 1:46 PM  

This issue of whether "strings" are attached to the spending is misleading..."strings" were not the sole reason that Palin provided for why she would not accept stimulus funding.

However, I'm a bit baffled as to why Palin didn't want the characterization by the Alaskan media of her position as a "rejection of stimulus funding" to stand, even if that's not what she did...it seems to me that the erroneous characterization benefits her more politically in Alaska and nationally than what she actually said at her press conference.

narciso March 25, 2009 1:52 PM  

Because she didn't reject all of the funds, she has legitimate concerns about strings, Persilly is to say a biased observer, now working for Hawker, who wants all the stimulus money and the AGIA to be closed up. Which is 'epic fail' on two points.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP