Monday, April 6, 2009

Senate Appointment Update; UPDATED: Governor Names Nelson to Seat



The ADN reports:

The standoff over Gov. Sarah Palin’s appointee to the state Senate continues. Senate Democrats sent a letter to Palin today saying they’ve rejected her choice of Tim Grussendorf and she’s required under the law to give them another name. “We hope this assists you by making our position clear,” it said.

Seven of the nine Senate Democrats signed the letter. Bethel Sen. Lyman Hoffman (Grussendorf is his chief of staff) and Nome Sen. Donny Olson didn't sign. The rest of them maintain Palin has until Friday to provide a new name, while Palin is sticking with Grussendorf.

Palin is backing down on her call for the entire Senate to vote on Grussendorf -- but still wants a public vote.

[...]

“My primary objective is to respectfully request the Senate to take this matter up and vote on it in public session,” Palin said in the press release. “The Alaska people and particularly the people of Juneau deserve a public vote on this. While the long-standing opinion of the Department of Law is that confirmation by a minority of the Senate potentially has constitutional problems, I recognize that the caucuses in the legislature prefer not to have a vote by the entire chamber. The Senate can decide for itself who participates in the vote. I am simply requesting that the vote be done in public.”

Previous C4P coverage of this issue can be found here.

UPDATE by Mel: Eddie Burke just announced that the governor has named Joe Nelson to the Senate seat. Nelson was not on the list of four names that the Democrats sent the governor last week. He applied for the seat through the governor's application process.


UPDATE II by Mel: The ADN has the story now:

Tim Grussendorf’s out. Gov. Sarah Palin just ended the standoff and submitted the name of Joe Nelson as her new appointee for the open seat representing Juneau in the state Senate.

[...]

Nelson is a board member of Sealaska, the Southeast Alaska Native Corp., and is a director of admissions at the University of Alaska Southeast. He is married to Mary Nelson, who used to represent Bethel as a Democrat in the state House. Here's his resume.

[...]

Palin had been sticking with legislative aide Grussendorf, saying the Senate Democrats’ vote to reject him last week wasn’t valid because it was done behind closed doors. Seven of the nine Senate Democrats sent Palin a letter today saying they were standing behind their actions, and Palin dropped the fight.

“I think that effort’s been exhausted,” said Palin’s spokeswoman, Sharon Leighow.

It’s far from a sure thing the Senate Democrats will now agree to give Nelson the job that opened when Juneau Democratic Sen. Kim Elton resigned to join the Obama administration. The Senate Democrats wanted Palin to work with Juneau Democratic Party officials, and Nelson’s wasn’t among the four names that the Juneau Democrats submitted to Palin last week.

The governor's letter naming Nelson to the seat can be found here. More about Mr. Nelson here:

[Nelson] has been a member of the Sealaska Board of Directors since 2003. He is chair of the Finance Committee, serves on the Shareholder Relations Committee and is a director of Sealaska Environmental Services, LLC.

[He] is currently director of admissions at the University of Alaska Southeast (UAS) and is a former director of Preparing Indigenous Teachers and Administrators for Alaska Schools (PITAAS) program. As director of admissions, he is responsible for all of UAS's outreach and recruitment efforts.

Born in Mount Edgecumbe, AK, Joe was raised as a commercial fisherman in Yakutat. He is a member of the Teikweidí (Brown Bear) Clan, eagle moiety of the Yakutat Tlingit tribe. After graduating Yakutat High School, Joe attended college in Southern California. He received a Bachelor of Arts in political science from UCLA in 1996 and earned his Master of Arts in American Indian studies in 1998. In 2001, he received a Juris Doctorate from Loyola Law School.

43 comments:

ugafish April 6, 2009 7:37 PM  

The letter that the senate dems sent to Sarah is interesting. If the senators that signed the letter also voted against Grussendorf, then perhaps the letter meets Sarah's standards for a public vote. The vote wasn't taken in public, but maybe this constitutes the vote being made public. I'm not sure because the Ear said the vote was closer, so maybe Sarah wants the vote to be taken in public in the same manner as all the other votes. Thoughts?

Jody April 6, 2009 7:37 PM  

So, what happens now? If she doesn't give them a name by Friday, does it go to the court for them to decide?
Is there something in the Alaskan constitution that says the voting senators have to do it in public?

Why is she pushing this so hard?

All I can think of is a bargaining chip but for what?

TommyReport April 6, 2009 7:47 PM  

Uga,

Sean Cockerham wasn't precise in his description of what the seven Senators conceded: you could read Cockerham's description of the letter in numerous ways.

The seven may have only conceded that the Senate dems as a caucus rejected Grussendorf, which is a factual observation and that they do not approve of Palin's call for a public vote.

We need to see the actual letter.

I'm guessing the Nome guy is a socially conservative democrat since he joined Palin at the parental consent press conference.

TommyReport April 6, 2009 7:50 PM  

Uga,

Let's just say that Sarah seems determined. She allegedly flipped according to Pat Forgery at the Juneau Empire who claims that she told the paper that she would select another nominee (they do not provide an actual quotation but Palin hasn't refuted Forgery's characterization). I'm guessing WAR brought to an alternative solution to her attention. I just wonder WAR's motivation for pursuing this route...

I expect her to sue to Senate Democrats on Wednesday.

She must be trying to make some friends with Juneau Republicans, who didn't vote for her in 2006 (her numbers were very bad in the purple district of Juneau).

T.Gerber April 6, 2009 7:59 PM  

Alaska open meeting statutes should kill the rejection.
Palin is throwing smoke screens.

T.Gerber April 6, 2009 8:04 PM  

And the statutes about senate confirmation are very likely unconstitutional.
The problem did already appear in1987,but was not pushed through.
This might be the nuclear option for her.
Her cards are not so bad.

wisetrog April 6, 2009 8:04 PM  

Was WAR too confrontational for her taste and misled her? Hope not.

ugafish April 6, 2009 8:09 PM  

Tommy,
If the letter is not a gamechanger, then why do you think that she will sue before the friday deadline?

T.Gerber April 6, 2009 8:24 PM  

Ross is a trial lawyer and does very likely have limited experience in constitutional law.
I would not underestimate Sarah, she has repeatedly stated that the Alaska constitution is the basic tool of her daily work.

gamsbo April 6, 2009 8:34 PM  

To me the letter should show who voted and it is now in the open...I for one hope she accepts it as such...I feel she may have gotten some bad advice from WAR...she always does what is best for Alaska ... and I trust she will this time...she is a very good person and does care about the people

ugafish April 6, 2009 8:37 PM  

Breaking News from Eddie Burke: Sarah named Joe Nelson to replace Elton

DB April 6, 2009 8:40 PM  

I think she should wait until Friday then appoint Gordon Jackson. If the Dems reject him, wait 10 more days before appointing someone else. By that time the legislative session will be over and the Dems will have been shorthanded. What a shame...

DB April 6, 2009 8:41 PM  

Who's Joe Nelson?

ugafish April 6, 2009 8:44 PM  

Here's the ADN's write up:
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/140237

TommyReport April 6, 2009 8:45 PM  

Uga,

I think your theory was right. That 'Cuda will say that the letter satisfied the standards for a public vote.

ADN has a profile of Nelson.

ugafish April 6, 2009 9:02 PM  

I think this was well played. She got a public statement from those that were against Grussendorf, and if the dems reject Nelson they will be seen as unreasonable. She got what she wanted, and the pressure is on the dems now.

victoria330 April 6, 2009 9:06 PM  

I only have 4 words to say: Governor Palin is brilliant! His resume looks great. Well played.

TommyReport April 6, 2009 9:06 PM  

Uga,

After reading through her letter to Stevens, she maintains that the rejection was illegal but determines that the need for Juneau to have some representation outweighs any further challenge on that point.

I think she at this point has lost some face because she took what seemed to be a hardline position on Grussendorf after his rejection. However, if this guy agrees with her on Native issues, I can see this saga turning out as a win for her. Perhaps this guy can make the argument that we've talked about: the Democrat party has moved too far to the left or too far in advocating for an increased government's role in native issues. I think that could be a winning hand for her.

Perhaps she could also announce that she'll introduce legislation calling for public votes for appointments in accordance with the law next session. That could be good politics.

DB April 6, 2009 9:07 PM  

If the dems reject Nelson, Sarah can successfully run out the clock on the legislative session by appointing Jackson 10 days hence.

TommyReport April 6, 2009 9:13 PM  

Listowski is calling for a rejection....the blog post has been updated:

"Rich Listowski, a state Democratic Party central committee member from Juneau, said Nelson hasn't been active in the party. "As a member of the central committee I would urge the senators to vote this nomination down in favor of the more experienced candidates who have run areawide in Juneau and have won elections," Listowski said after hearing of the pick."

DB April 6, 2009 9:13 PM  

Tommy,
That is a good point. Governor Palin can regain the upper hand by introducing legislation to have future confirmation votes in public as you suggest. Open and transparent political processes have always been a hallmark of her efforts. The dems (and rinos as well) will be in a box. How can they argue against a bill to force votes to be held in the open? If I was an Alaskan senator, I wouldn't want to take that position with my constituents.

sarah palin rocks April 6, 2009 9:15 PM  

Joe Nelson is a Native Alaskan with outstanding qualifications. Let's see if the Dems are open to accepting a Native Alaskan for this seat. The Natives do need more representation in State Legislature from what I have heard.

Upinak would know the situation.

Palin made a smart choice.

Videmus Omnia April 6, 2009 9:16 PM  

J Sawyer, thanks for the tip on the photo.

section9 April 6, 2009 9:17 PM  

Well played, especially if Palin can play the Native card and force the Dems to accept one of their own in a bout of identity politics.

I suspect that she always knew she was going to have to fall back to this.

ugafish April 6, 2009 9:18 PM  

Tommy,
Perhaps she took a hardline position on Grussendorf, in order to set up Nelson's confirmation. She conceded a correct argument to do what is right for Juneau, and the pressure is now on the senate dems.

Videmus Omnia April 6, 2009 9:18 PM  

Tommy, sounds like the Juneau Dems want one of their professional community organizers instead of an actual citizen legislator.

J Sawyer April 6, 2009 9:26 PM  

thanks, VO.

It's hard to imagine regular Dems not seeing through the insider argument against him.

wisetrog April 6, 2009 9:30 PM  

If I read her right, she's making the Dems seem as an inbred corrupt political machine same as the state GOP. Interesting.

TommyReport April 6, 2009 9:33 PM  

Uga,

Let's see if she hits the tvs and the press to fight for this guy or if this guy will fight for it harder than Grussendorf.

You guys are all advancing solid arguments about citizen-legislators vs. machine politicians (which is different from my idealogical argument about liberal and moderate dems since this guy could be a socialist for all we know).

Let's just say that I wouldn't want a public vote if I were a Senate dem for this guy, hahaha.

Lipstick April 6, 2009 9:40 PM  

Well played by Palin.

I think she made all her points.

-She will not be pushed around by the Dems and made to pick the person they want her to.

-She also has stirred up a unity problem in the Democratic party there.

-She has made the GOP in Alaska happy by making the Dems do a little in fighting.

-She appears to be making concessions and being nice to work with (to the general public) by backing down a bit and appointing someone else who applied for the seat.

-She is helping her cause in the native community by appointing a native.

-I think her tough stand on Grussendorf was done knowing she would have to maybe back off a bit. Makes her look very reasonable and not someone who is not able to compromise and work with.

Once again a brilliant play by the 'Cuda in a tough situation.

Ceejay April 6, 2009 10:16 PM  

Wow, that is strategy! Thank goodness Sarah is on our side, can you imagine what the Dems will look like if they reject one of their own who is a native Alaskan? They will be run out of town I project.

manajordan April 6, 2009 10:17 PM  

I have to admit I started to laugh when I read the update. Well done 'Cuda. I'm as impressed as ever.

Jenny April 6, 2009 10:22 PM  

GO SARAH!!
I know the guys at the site has asked the 'Cuda to get a native (who's qualified of course), and here he is! Awesome news! Sarah never disappoints.

AKReport April 6, 2009 11:06 PM  

AWESOME MOVE SARAH! :D

narciso April 6, 2009 11:12 PM  

An additional point, contrasting the foolishness of the Celtic woman, she plays her cards straight up, she reads the bills,
checks the pertinent law, and goes forward. While we're worrying about the pesky anklebiters she's handling at least three big projects, the Driftwood terminal
filtration,the Senate vote, and
watching over the progress on the pipeline. A marked contrast with
dangerous and vapid rhetoric on the other side of the Atlantic

AKReport April 7, 2009 12:44 AM  

Senate Hardball: Palin Vs Dems

Round 1 --- Obama Drone kim elton gets rewared for bogus troopergate smear.

Winner: Dems

Round 2 --- Dems beak traddition and have the Gall to pick libearl wingnut, beth kurtulla. Palin Asks for new Names.

Winner: Palin

Round:3 --- Palin picks gursndorf, creates wedge, but dems use his vote in a republican primary as an exuse to reject him, but dems hid behind closed doors to avoid pecived infighting.

Winner: Even


Palin calls for public vote, dems chicken out and reject public vote.

Winner: Palin


Palin gives up on grunsdorf, but Dems give up on beth, and will submit new names.

Winner: Even


Knock Out Blow! Palin picks a Native Alaskan, Dems don’t want to be seen as racist so they cave in and confirm

Winner Palin


Total: Palin 3 Dems 1

sarah palin rocks April 7, 2009 12:57 AM  

AKReport:

Thanks for your Senate Hardball Report!

Your analysis helps give a clearer picture of where we are on this. It's so cool that you can give us the "insiders baseball" view!

This is turning to quite an interesting week for Sarah.

latinchic April 7, 2009 1:25 AM  

Well, I don't know if Palin planned this all along like some of you might be inferring (sp?), but it was a good move nonetheless.

Kudos, Gov. Hope this one works out.

LindaW April 7, 2009 1:25 AM  

I think she's doing this because she wants some fresh faces in the legislature. I think she's tired of the same old people. Perhaps the 4 names on the list are people whom are not spoken highly of by the public and she is aware of that.

techno April 7, 2009 2:52 AM  

Who was the first person born in Alaska to be elected to the US Senate from Alaska?

1) MIke Gravel

2)Frank Murkowski

3)Lisa Murkowski

4)Mark Begich

5)Ted Stevens

TommyReport April 7, 2009 3:09 AM  

Gravel, a strong guess without google.

Ted Stevens is a trick answer.

The Aged P April 7, 2009 5:42 AM  

Don’t know much about Alaska politics specifically or US politics in general but when Tommy said “You guys are all advancing solid arguments about citizen-legislators vs. machine politicians (which is different from my ideological argument about liberal and moderate dems since this guy could be a socialist for all we know)” I get the feeling that Sarah feels more comfortable with and has a greater respect for someone who does not share her views but is honest and open than machine hacks from either party. I am sure that in Cook County in 2006 she would have supported Forrest Claypool against John Stroger unlike another politician whose name escapes me for a moment…

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP