Warning: Gov. Palin's Authenticity May Cause Onset of PDS
(Photo: USAToday)Remember when former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said this in defense of Governor Palin during the Republican National Convention last September?
Newt laid the proverbial smackdown on that dejected MSNBC reporter, leaving even Keith Olbermann shaking in his "big and tall" tailored suit.
Immediately after the election, Gingrich then went on to say to Fox News' Greta Van Susteren of Gov. Palin that "She'll be a force for a long time;" "She clearly has a nationwide constituency, she's intelligent, she's articulate;" "She's going to wear very well on the American people..." here:
Watch Newt defend the Governor here, here, and here.
However, just a couple weeks after the election, Newt's tone and overall rhetoric regarding Gov. Palin began to shift as evidenced here on Face the Nation:
To what can this shift in opinion from the former Speaker regarding the Governor be attributed? Sadly it's just politics as usual, folks. Simple as that.
The rhetoric shift can be partially attributed to a politician simply seeking to boost his credentials, pocketbook, and favorability ratings amongst the public. Just take a look at the events to which both Governor Palin and Newt Gingrich have been invited this year (of which we have knowledge): CPAC 2009 and the NRCC/NRSC fundraiser.
As previously reported at C4P here and here, Gov. Palin had only been invited to CPAC; she at no point indicated she would attend. For whom did this crack open the door of opportunity politically? Why, I'll be darned...Newt Gingrich, of course!
Oh, and since da 'Cuda also chose not to attend the NRCC/NRSC fundraiser this coming summer, guess who was chosen to fill in for her? That's right. It's Newt doggone it! Surprise! (Find extensive C4P coverage of this here and here.) As our own R. A. Mansour elaborated, the NRCC/NRSC dinner truly could have had a "contender," but they behaved a bit impatiently, much like a child searching for Christmas presents in his parent's closet (What? Hasn't everyone?), spoiling the fun for everyone - not to mention the considerable amount of potential cash and attention Gov. Palin would have undoubtedly drawn to the event. Yes, RAM. I concur. This really is yet another "epic fail" on the part of the GOP.
So now you're probably asking yourself, "Gee, what's Newt said recently that's got this contributor all fired up? It's not like he snubbed Governor Palin on Leno or anything."
You're right. No snub on national television due to a creeping senility or just out of sheer spite, but let's just say Newt may be thinking about his political future in this piece from Christianity Today:
Who do you see as the emerging leaders in the Republican Party: Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin?
Bobby Jindal is certainly brilliant and has a great future. Tim Pawlenty has a great future. There are a lot of people who are terrific. The fact is, I think that you can look at [governor of South Carolina] Mark Sanford, Paul Ryan in the House, [California congressman] Kevin McCarthy, or Eric Cantor [in the House]. I just think we're likely to have a dramatic resurgence. We have two great candidates in Ohio, John Kasich for governor and Rob Portman for the Senate, who are likely to be very, very effective.
Do you see any women emerging in the GOP leadership?
I would start, frankly, with Linda Lingle in Hawaii, who was a terrific governor who got re-elected in very difficult circumstances. You have Kay Bailey Hutchinson running for the governorship of Texas. If she wins that, she will automatically be a national figure because she'll be the governor of the second largest state.
You didn't mention Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin has an obvious role if she wants it. The question for her has to be, are she and her family willing to go through another couple of years of the kind of media coverage that they currently get? Is she willing to do the kind of development of national issues and development of a national profile that would be required? She is a celebrity in her own right. She is probably the most successful figure in the party right now, and she's a formidable figure. I think to go from there to becoming a national leader would take a significant amount of work.
Woah. So let me get this straight. Newt Gingrich has gone from believing Sarah Palin is "...a force for a long time..."; "...having a nationwide constituency..."; "...best known Republican governor in the country today..." after the election to now snubbing her outright in interviews. Please, spare us the "is her family willing to go through another couple of years of the kind of media coverage that they currently get?" argument. How come this does not apply to any other of the names mentioned? What about Bobby Jindal's family? This issue is obviously a red herring, leading us away from the root of the problem.
Notice how Newt cannot control his "politicking" by resorting to last ditch efforts such as mentioning the names of other GOP women prior to Governor Palin like Gov. Linda "Does my lei look good?" Lingle and even Sen. Kay Bailey "I don't know Palin" Hutchison.
Don't misunderstand. I think the former Speaker has done much for the GOP (in the 1990s) and in terms of educating the folks of the need to "drill here, drill now", but his sudden throwing of Gov. Palin under the bus is wrong, and we ordinary barbarians should stand up and fight. Come on, Mr. Speaker. We thought you were a team player.
If Gov. Lingle or Sen. Hutchison were so much more qualified or experienced to be John McCain's VP pick than Gov. Palin, why didn't Sen. McCain choose one of them? Conservatives should have been so much more at ease with them in the #2 spot, right? Isn't that what you're saying, Mr. Speaker? First of all, how are either of these women more qualified than Sarah Palin? Lingle was elected to her first term in 2002, (formerly Mayor of Maui County...sound like anyone we know?) and Hutchison has been a Senator for 16 years (Is it getting difficult to control your enthusiasm yet?). I bet those campaign rallies would have been so much more intense and exciting than a rally with the Governor from Alaska headlining (that accent drives me bananas, anyway). I bet those rallies would have gone just like this:
For this Sen. McCain is due a major thanks. He chose a real, authentic, genuine, and honest politician for that #2 slot. "An honest politician, really?" You're probably thinking it sounds like an oxymoron. It's not, and Governor Sarah Palin proves that time and again.
For example, just look at the Vanderburgh County Right to Life Banquet Governor Palin attended last Thursday. Why did she go? It's a cause that is near and dear to her heart, especially due to her Christian faith and her own personal struggles with coming to grips about her own son, Trig, being born with Down's Syndrome. The Right to Life folks even offered to put on a fundraiser for Gov. Palin's SarahPAC, to which she said "thanks, but no thanks."
Those who witnessed the incredibly heartfelt and revealing speech by Gov. Palin last Thursday know that she truly is that "Storm" from the North, as Michael Steele introduced her as. She has that X-factor that no other current GOP name has - what you see is what you get.
Thomas Langhorne from the Evansville Courier writes:
Overflow crowd saw Sarah, not candidate.
Nick Hermann, chairman of the Vanderburgh County Republican Party, said Palin's personal magnetism, which Mack likened to Obama's, is also a key to her appeal.
The Right to Life banquet marked the fourth time Hermann has seen Palin in person, including the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn., and two 2008 campaign speeches in Indiana.
"She has great stage presence, but she also works the crowd well," Hermann said. "It's unusual to have both. (Former GOP presidential candidate) Mike Huckabee, for instance, works the crowd well but doesn't have the stage presence."
[...]
But he said Palin has an "Every Woman" appeal and a personal authenticity that could prove to be considerable political assets on the road to 2012.
"The Right to Life banquet (at which Palin teared up over her baby son who was born with Down syndrome and spoke openly of her teenage daughter's pregnancy) was the first time I've seen her really open up and talk about her story, her feelings," he said. "Sometimes, politicians seem too perfect. She really connected with people."
It was a sentiment expressed over and over again by people who met Palin while she was in Evansville, including several young servers at Biaggi's Ristorante Italiano who waited on the Alaska governor at Friday's private breakfast event hosted by S.M.I.L.E. on Down syndrome.
"It didn't even feel like you were in front of somebody that was famous," said server Chrissy Heffernan. "It felt like you were in front of somebody that you've known forever. She was just very nice, very personable, very personable."
Goedde, who headed up a detail of about 20 city and county law enforcement officers who volunteered or were compensated by Right to Life to guard Palin, said he made a point of watching the Alaska governor's interactions with people.
"I thought, 'I'm going to watch and see if there's ever a sign that this is all a put-on,'" he said. "I never saw it. Never once did I see her say or do anything that made her look less than sincere, like rolling her eyes when no one was looking.
[...]
"She was just like a hometown girl from Evansville, Ind., coming home after making good."
[...]
Goedde marveled at Palin's ability to remember the first names of people she met and to connect with each of the law enforcement officers who protected her.
"People looked up to her almost in a rock star way, but it was also with respect, not just 'Oh, Sarah, Sarah,'" he said. "I don't know any other way to say it, but this lady is the real deal."
Palin made a similar impression on Nina Fuller, who shared a private breakfast with her and about a half-dozen other people Friday morning before the larger event at Biaggi's.
"There was not a political word in the conversation," said Fuller, executive director of S.M.I.L.E.
"Gov. Palin is now a good friend of mine, and her name is Sarah."
It can be deduced that people really, really like Governor Palin. They aren't as attracted to the more "standoffish" types like Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney or those who may lack a bit in the stage presence area like Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, or Tim Pawlenty. This isn't an attack on their personalities - it's factual. So, it seems logical the the GOP and its leaders would want to embrace a rising star in its party like Gov. Palin. Why don't they? What's the deal? Aren't they only hurting themselves by leaving her out to dry?
The answer to this question is simple. It comes with the price of human nature. Newt Gingrich obviously has his own political interests in mind for the upcoming 2012 campaign. This can be the only explanation of his "leveling of the playing field" to not include Gov. Palin in his responses to questions about GOP leadership. Why would he want to place himself in the path of "the Storm" anyway? She'd be too much of an obstacle, so best to get her out of the path first.
Want to know what the good news is out of all of this nonsense? Each time the Governor of Alaska is beaten and bruised, whether it be dealing with the legislative issues at home or the lack of support from many of the "intellectuals" in the conservative movement, she comes back stronger than ever. She has the personality type to continue sprinting up and down a basketball court despite having a stress-fractured ankle (yes, it's a true story).
Sorry to break the news to both the folks in the GOP and on the left who may begin to show any symptoms of PDS as time wears on, (Palin Derangement Syndrome) but Sarah Palin wasn't called the Barracuda in high school for nothing. Despite all the hatred towards her faith, the "tabloidization" of her family, the false lack of experience and lack of intelligence claims, Governor Sarah Palin won't "crawl up in the corner and quiver" as my Business Policy professor would say to those students who aren't prepared for class. She's ready for a fight. A fight to stand up for her faith, her family, and her state; a fight to appeal and relate to the "Joe the Plumbers" of this great nation that keep this country running every day; a fight to prove that Americans aren't just looking for someone who talks a good talk but has a proven track record of walking the walk, no matter what the political or personal consequences may be.
This is why millions of Americans love Governor Sarah Palin, and this is why we here at C4P continue to stand up and fight for her every day. It is, after all, the logical thing to do.
Cross posted at Sarah's Full-Court Press.






71 comments:
Uh, Newt, as Thomas Paine said, "These are the times that try men's souls."
But I believe Sarah would most likely quote Douglas MacArthur, "Age wrinkles the body. Quitting wrinkles the soul."
She's not quitting, Newt. Neither are we.
As you say, Newt has his own political aspirations, and nobody thats looking at running in 2012 wants to be up against Palin. She's too formidable.
Though I like Newt to a certain extent, and understand the very strong political ambitions of many politicians, Newt is indicating through his pretty obvious 2012 aspirations that he is suffering from the equivalent of an partial lobotomy.
NOBODY would vote for him. He is unelectable. He has more baggage then Palin, Jindal and Romney combined, and unlike those potential candidates, absolutely no ability to sell himself to the electorate.
Given his mind is obviously in la-la land, perhaps he should retire from politics? With that sort of judgement on his own political future, you'd have to question anything he said ... and whether he is just going to be a spoiler for the real contenders.
Well I think he sees the grief she is getting and doesn't want to be out in the weather with us of more fortitude and conviction. I don't think he is planning on running for President unless he thinks everything President Pantywaist is doing is going to cause such an uproar and meltdown that he thinks this is his chance, in which case we'll make campaign ads for SArah and he'll be the star!
Sorry, but Newt lost it with me when he did that Al Gore commercial with Nancy Pelosi and that global warming business. Al Gore has no degree in science and is a phony.
Newt also complimented Obama on appointing Hillary, and in other areas. He also wrote on his Twitter account that he did an interview with that vile and disgusting magazine Rolling Stone. How much do you want to bet that there'll be something anti-Palin in the conversation?
Sarah, knocks Obama every chance she gets and she doesn't give a rip what the MSM thinks about her.
That is so awesome. I've been waiting for a conservative leader like her for quite a while.
I don't discount anybody, including Newt. At this point in the proceedings in 2005, would many pundits have given McCain or Obama a chance to secure the nomination for their respective parties? I think not.
However, don't get me wrong if things go as I expect them to there is no way that Sarah would not garner the nomination in 2012.
However, what if Trig gets really sick, which forces her out of the Presidential derby? Then its anybody's game.
What if Sarah or Todd suffer a serious accident or develop a debilitating sickness?
Folks, life can strike back when you least expect it.
What if Sarah decides that Obama cannot be beaten?
Having made the argument why Sarah may not run I can use the same argument to promote why Sarah should run.
In 2016 Sarah and Todd will be in their 50's. What if one of them has a heart attack or develops cancer.
That is why if Sarah can, she should run in 2012. With life, there are no guarantees.
I just sent Newt's spokesperson an email with the subject line: "Say it ain't so, Newt!" and a link to this article.
Join me and show Newt that he shouldn't mess with the Cuda.
From www.newt.org:
Rick Tyler
Spokesperson and Press Secretary
Gingrich Communications
540-338-1250
email: ricktyler@newt.org
Techno,
Actually, McCain securing the GOP nomination in 2005 wasn't much of a surprise given his high name recognition.
The difference between McCain and Newt? McCain's favorables have always been very high while Newt's have been near Rush level for the better part of a decade.
Well if their are going to be 20 or 30 leaders, I wish some of those so call leaders would start taking some of the hits.
I am so glad c4p addressed Newt. I had seen a tweet about Newt dissing Palin I did a google search and saw that Christianity Today article and wanted to see your take on it so I posted it in a few threads.
Needless to say I am pleased someone addressed this. :D
I'm Pro-Sarah all the way you know. Albeit a regular C4P lurker. Maybe I'll join the fun. Who knows. BTW, a hint as to who I am would be on facebook. My profile pic has me and Sarah Palin at one of her rallies. ;)
But I applaud C4P! Keep up the good work. ::thumbsup::
Anyways THANKS for addressing it.
I don't understand Newt'shamhanded approach, actually I do, it's been the hallmark of much of what he did in the mid 90s and onward. How he stormed the ramparts but then gradually undid most everything he had built up, the degree of dis
respect shown in recent weeks
is really quite extraordinary.
Since probably about a year ago, I followed Bill Dyer'recommendation's
of her record, relying on Adam Brinkley and Kaylene Johnson, that encouraged me that she might be a possibility, although a longshot. After Obama's victors tour of Germany, where he had not deigned
to visit Ramstein, while she had visited a wounded soldier in Kuwait, I thought that she seemed
the perfect contrast. When picked
I was ecstatic, but I couldn't have imagined what was done to diminish her person, much less her record. I guess Greta's on the road access to her family, really won me over, After the election, I was really dejected at the consequences of the deception that been pulled off.
No other political leader would have gotten me to travel 1.500 miles north, for the CPAC
conference,even after the announcement of her unavailability there. Everyone I saw up there, with one snarky exception raved about her. I've defended her in forums as far away as Australia
(Tim Blair's blog) I made my first
campaign contribution because of her, and I hope to make more. I got a little nauseating in the praise department on one of the blogs I frequent, I'll admit, then I finally found my way here, after frequenting Freedberg and Neptunus and Jamie's blog, around the time of the release of her emails
I've been reassured that all the right people like Steyn and Nordlinger and Kristol, and even Paglia in her own idiosyncratic way, supported her, and all who gamble on Obama, were horribly wrong, and still can't admit it.
A reformist, pro military, pro gun, pro energy development, pro life, pro tax cut, potential candidate, isn't this who we've been searching for at least 20 years
Frankly I wish I was more adept at HTML or Java, I basically do so links and quotes, but nothing like what Rebecca and Joseph have put together, I was overawed, frankly
maybe i'ms a little rambling. That comment referencing Atlas Shrugged
prophetic nature, might be worth something I like how much "Bagel" suggestion was picked up, I just took Upinak's statement to the next level. It's good that Juneau will finally have represwntation, why didn't they do this a month
ago, though
Techno I don't like to dwell on all the possible derailing moments
between now and three years from now, it's enough of a daunting enterprise we're contemplating. I
hope the hopes and prayers and even a booster shot of that witch doctors 'dispoiling' against ill will will suffice
Now,now... don't be too hard on old Newt. I would say his ego took a bit of a battering when he was asked to be keynote speaker at the Republican fundraiser only because Governor Palin couldn't commit.
No one likes being billed as 'the keynote (they asked when Sarah Palin can't make it) speaker'!!
JeanA, April 19, 2009 10:41 PM
Well if their are going to be 20 or 30 leaders, I wish some of those so call leaders would start taking some of the hits.
==========================
LOL, JeanA, good one.
Actually, thats a difference between between Palin and the rest.
Remember how McCain rolled over, once the MSM started saying the Republican campaign was inciting hatred. It wasn't - its Obama, he is very polarising. Even more then Palin...the only difference is that the MSM incite that polarising of palin, try to reduce it for Obama! Or worse, start calling it racially motivated.
The Rep contenders for 2012 will get a going over, and ALL/ANY of them will roll, they can't take the heat, and/or they like the establishment stamp of approval.
Huckabee along with Palin are probably the exceptions.
That is a problem, they can't take it, won't run an effective campaign against Obama. They will be cowered.
Its just another reason why palin is the GOP's only hope, at least for 2012. The major ones of course rests on sellability - against Obama the GOP needs a very charismatic leader that can raise wads of money.
Palin is the only one in that category....she stands alone.
I agree with techno, with his qualifications about life and it being a long road:
"no way that Sarah would not garner the nomination in 2012"
The GOP, and individuals within it, politicians or writers or pundits or bloggers can say what they want. But really they should just accept it, support and assist, as thats the best way to ensure success in 2012. It won't be an easy election.
But politics is nearly all about ego. At the moment they just find Palin too threatening to the establishment, their personal aspirations, as well as potentially too dominating about where the party will be heading.
I'd like to see some christian conservative leaders start coming out and supporting Palin. Without her, surely they must realize they will just get another RINO, and even worse, lose the 2012 election.
If they don't get the right Rep leader this time around, many of their goals could be very hard to achieve in the future, given the direction Obama is taking the country.
Ha, I love Gov. Palin.
I loved Gov. Palin before she was the VP pick.
Hi Jennyinoz,
I didn't mean to come across as disrespectful of the Speaker. He was a good leader for the GOP, and I agree with him on many issues.
Just thought we'd let him know that we stand up for our "mama grizzly" when need be. :-)
We'll see what happens here...I bet Newt really doesn't have ill-will toward Palin at all, it's just convenient that she's now a force to be reckoned with potenitally in 2012. :)
Off-topic but Jindal is starting to get for his travel costs as well....
http://www.wwltv.com/local/politics/stories/wwl041609jindaltravel.e01af76b.html
Huckabee is returning to Iowa:
http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2009/04/huckabees_iowa.php
Totally off topic.
It appears that everything has passed that was on today's schedule with a few notable exceptions:
Remember Rep. Ramras goofy resolution about AGIA? That was withdrawn.
Tommy- where was the unemployment stuff?
Here is a link
http://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/get_calendar.asp?session=26&Body=B&Date=041909&Button=Display
Newt should know better - fifteen years ago, he was taking the kinds of hits Sarah is taking now.
Bottom line, Newt is yesterday's news. His best chance would have been back in 1996, maybe 2000.
Next has a toxic personality, personal baggage galore, and is wildly overrated as an "idea man."
Why on earth would anyone consider him for POTUS, other than the fact that he's been in DC since when dinosaurs roamed the earth?
She has just begin to write the chapter for this country and the history book and it future
- Michael Steele
Carpenter,
I don't see it. Perhaps they had already passed the change in law required?
Check out the state sovereignty resolution...did it pass?
I'm so SICK of the Republicans and their petty, selfish jealousies. Get over yourself, Newt. And all the rest of you "leaders," too.
Carpenter,
No, you are right, the unemployment insurance laws needed to be changed by the end of today.
http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=10208547
"Aside from the capital budget, some major bills are up for a vote on the House floor Saturday night -- a bill that would raise the minimum wage, money for power cost equalization, $9 million for energy assistance, and a bill that would change the laws for unemployment insurance so the state can receive federal stimulus money for unemployment."
J.Smith, Thanks
You nailed It!
It just slays me every time McCain, Newt, and any other Repub. snub or dismiss Sarah, It's like J. Smith said It's the HUMAN NATURE thing!
I will follow Sarah to the gates of hell itself because she is REAL and better than that she is HONEST and POSSESSES a SERVANTS HEART OF GOLD.
When running for Governor Sarah's father was interviewed and the thing that still sticks with me in his assessment of Sarah he did not elaborate or embellish Sarah's achievements but sternly and emphatically said " I CAN GUARANTEE ALASKANS ONE THING SHE IS HONEST". It came from a fathers pride that if he ever taught her any thing it was to be just that.
I have heard the same story many times as that law enforcement officer observing Sarah in action for any indication of false pretense and coming away a believer.
I have not been so fortunate to meet Sarah live but from her VP speech until now I have absolutely believed the REALNESS she exudes and thats what separates and propels her into our hearts.
A different kind of leader indeed from what we have had to choose from for a long time.
HONESTY trumps mistakes, gaffs, oratory, or supposed knowledge, the lady possesses an intellect of humanism, compassion and love based on faith and a higher purpose.
Dismiss her at you own pearl to all shame on you.
I guess people's egos are too strong to get in the way of their memories. Or maybe he can't really support a strong, resourceful
conservative woman, the Tories had that same problem thirty years ago, and ultimately they threw their standard bearer 'under the bus' and it eventually earned their dozen years of exile, which maybe broken by the sharper Heath
or Alec Douglas Home,DavidCameron, for whatever brief interval that turns out to be. Maybe the truth is what Van Der Leun addressed in two slogans "Republicans, they thirst for death" (their party's
hold on power, anyways)and "Better Dead than led, by Palin" That would be a shame, for the nation and the world.
The Legislature has officially adjourned...
Hi JS,
just reread your article again. Must say its very good, you cover it all very well. I like the Bueller vid!!! Yeah, that is how it is in politics an awful lot of the time!
Just extending your thoughts ... its obvious Palin is the GOP and the country's best chance in 2012.
This "let a thousand flowers bloom" type nonsense is appalling. The GOP has only produced a couple of bright flowers the last several decades as presidential candidates, can't they see that Palin is one (with Reagan), and that the probablity of another emerging in the next few years is zilch?
Its discouraging that the GOP and conservatives are just so willing to defend personal positions and aspirations, and allow this disaster Obama to continue for 8 years. This administration in that period will change the whole landscape in a way that has never been done before, and probably will marginalize the GOP for many more years.
They need to get their act together quick smart.
That is why I say christian conservtive leaders or groups need to start leading by supporting Palin. The GOP needs to be pushed.
I don't think palin needs them to be the nominee for 2012. But to improve the chances of what will be a tough election this support and teamwork needs to start as soon as possible.
At the moment its business as usual - the petty politicking, shoring up personal ambitions, clinging to roles.
Tommy,
What happened to the 9 million for the gas line?
The sovereignty bill passed.
I guess the unemployment stuff was passed yesterday. See SB 170
They gave the governor 7 million for the gas line instead of 9 million.
Uga,
Cockerham has a post up about it.
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/140666
Will there be a post-session presser for her tonight?
Oh my heck. Get a load of what Andrea McLeod wrote in the comment section of this article about the legislative session being over.
She really needs to find something to do.
She is scary.
Sorry here's the link.
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/140669
All of that squawking for $2 mil?
That is .02% of a $10 billion budget.
I have to disagree with the article, in this regard. Newt might be snubbing Palin, but it appears to be nothing more than a political move on his part. This isn't, in my book, PDS. That belongs to Sullivan, Olbermann, Parker, Frum, etc. In other words, PDS afflicts those obsessed with Palin and who criticize her every move, indeed who loathe her very existence. I think saying Newt now has PDS is an error. If he does, then you can throw that label at anyone who takes a shot at her and, hey, that's what happens in politics. I just believe it's a bad idea to water down true PDS.
I actually met Newt and spoke with him for a few minutes about my own campaign. I told him that I was a conservative running in a pretty liberal district. He told me to find the issues that we have in common and embrace those issues. Stuff like public safety, good roads, etc...
I listened and I won.
That being said, Newt is only playing politics here. Newt is worried about Newt, not Governor Palin.
Newt mentioned all of the people that have no intention of running for President in 2012.
No- I do not think Jindal will run in 2012, the timing is bad for him. Maybe 2016
K...when it says wait t/gov does that mean it passed...thank you
Yeah, it's not PDS, he just wants to make hay for himself while the sun(Palin) doesn't shine.
narciso, great comment. We should have a thread where we do a confessional on how we found Palin.
I first read about her in the Weekly Standard, did a google search of her images immediately( just to get to know how she looks), afterwards I read she appeared on Craig Fergusson and I watched the video.
I read a post somewhere that a grassroots movement was breaking out for her, so I checked out a couple of blogs. I may have read Adam Brickley, I don't remember but I definitely read Steve Maloney( why isn't he here? is there a problem with him?) Unlike some here, I didn't research her record being a foreigner and all. I knew about the Trig story and after that stories about her seemed to drop a little; I remember Jim Gerahgty saying "no new mothers." So, mostly I followed the web phenomenon Palin rather than the candidate Palin.
I saw the news of her vp pick on international tv and gave an instinctive whoop of joy. Because till then I was hoping Hillary would beat Obama and I couldn't stomach Obama's ascension. I was afraid Mccain would be no match but this I knew in my gut was a gamechanger. So by the time I knew it was already confirmed, a half an hour before her Daytona speech. I logged onto hot air and followed the thread from the morning of that day. Saw the daytona speech and to be fair, neither liked or disliked it. The next three or four days followed the media storm and was astonished at the vitriol. I used to follow talk left then and was astonished at the sea change in jerallyn Mitt's attitude.
The speech did it for me. She said everything I was hoping someone would say. She slashed and burned Obama and laid before our eyes what a joke he was. Regardless of values, career, qualifications, her bold taking on of Obama was what did it for me. I fell right in the movement followed the campaign obsessively which was kinda hard because there was I didn't have internet then but had to go find it in a shop. By the end of the campaign i was all in.
After the election, I was surprised at the vitriol that was poured on her. I defended her at hot air by my then meek self. I used to read ram n upinak n others there too but didn't know they were hanging out here. The minute I knew I switched here and it's been awesome since then.
Hi EricNTejas,
I see what you mean. I didn't mean that Newt has full-blown PDS, and I apologize for not making that clear in the piece. I've gone through and altered the mentions of PDS. Go take a look. I know this better relflects my intentions overall.
Sorry about the confusion.
Cheers.
J Smith:
No problem, and it's a good article. Newt was one of her biggest defenders during the election, and now, well, who knows. I generally like him, but he should be called on this. BTW, the latest tactic, one of them, seems to be claiming that the establishment GOP in Washington has thrown Palin under the bus. If that is the case, I say good riddance. These same people have been horrific the past decade. Of course, when they see how much SarahPAC has made and will make, I bet some change their tune.
The governor is holding a press conference right now.
KTOO.com
The first picture I saw of Gov. Palin was the one where she didn't have her glasses on. It was taken a couple of years ago for an article on 'up and coming' governors. The first time I saw her in action was a Kudlow interview on CNBC and then the Bartiromo interview about Alaskan oil. Maria and Kudlow have always been good to her. I believe the Barnes article (when the journalists took a cruise ship up there)
had the picture of her in her office with the animal rugs and horns. I knew then she meant business.
Politics is really rough. That's why if the only other thing that Gov. Palin ran for was the hills I would support her. But, I don't see her really doing that. As Laura Ingraham puts it, Sarah Palin is unafraid. She will be successful because she does things with a servants heart.
Jody,
I'm not getting anything....can you provide the play by play.
It looks like the press conference is over... hmmm...
TommyReport
I caught it too late. I missed almost all of it. It's over. I think they will have audio of it soon.
Ok, my confessional (bless me Father for I have sinned). I first heard about Palin a few months before McCain picked her, but only in passing on talk radio. Then I think Laura Ingraham mentioned her again as a possible pick, and about a week and a half before the selection, I started googling her and found some of her interviews on YouTube. There weren't many but I watched them all (Craig Ferguson, Larry Kudlow, one with Charlie Rose, a woman's forum in SF, her debate with Knowles and Halcro) and started getting excited. But I didn't think McCain would pick her because I kept hearing that it would be Romney or Pawlenty, plus the LA Times had mentioned "Tasergate" as a knock against her. That Saturday (wait was it a Saturday or Sunday?), I slept late, turned it on Fox, and literally said out loud "holy s*** he picked her!" And then she came out w/ her family and gave that terrific opening speech. It was much fun watching her suck all the life out of Obama's momentum from the DNC. And I've been somewhat of an addict since.
Newt is a has-been, trying to get back on the band wagon.
Sorry I have no love for Newt.. I remember him when I was in the military. I won't even go there! Newt is and will forever be on my list of "poop".
Erich you should have seen me tell Allah at HotAir about Palin 6 months before the election.
He has had a grudge against me ever since. :)
The audio of Sarah's press conference is up.
the audio of gov press conference is available now
She said she will decide on the stimulus on a case by case basis.
guys....link for the presser?
http://www.ktoo.org/gavel/audio.cfm
If you want to skip ahead to questions, they start at the 32 minute mark.
upinak:
So when AP goes insane, we can blame you then? lol
We're getting up video of the presser ASAP :-)
Erich... yep you can say that.
Thanks for the audio. She's getting back her fluency. I think it's a sign of confidence. Indiana did her a lot of good.
Guys,
I'm loving it....she's stonewalling when she needs to, she's definitive when she needs to be, ahahah. Pretty confident woman.
However, I think Karen is mistaken as to the deadline for formal application of the fiscal stabilization money. From reading this article, it sounds like the deadline would be 75 days from April 3rd, not 2011. The 2011 is the deadline by which the state has to use the money.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/336/story/65407.html
Anyone know the deadline by which she has to veto a piece of legislation?
Does anybody know who Bob is? I that's the guy who always trys to engage her in an argument.
Tommy,
Doesn't she have thirty days to veto a bill?
Uga,
No idea.
Tommy,
You're right on in your assessment of her performance. I thought she played it perfectly. I agree with wise that Indiana probably refreshed her.
Uga,
Check out the full report now on Egan....
http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=10210462&nav=menu510_2
The pictures and video are pretty funny. Lots of smiles, hahahaha. Even the reporter couldn't contain her smile....
However, the reporter said that Palin said that she would work on perhaps revising the method of selecting a replacement in the interim period.
Tommy,
That's another reason why I count this as a win for Sarah, because she will reform the process.
Cockerham's full write-up of the session is up:
http://www.adn.com/news/government/legislature/story/765362.html
Another write-up:
http://www.ktva.com/ci_12181168
Midnight press-release? hahaha
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/news.php?id=1775
All's well that ends well, I suppose. She gets a shot at reforming the murky nomination process, she has her budget priorities in tact and she's still in charge of stimulus dollars which she can veto as she deems fit.
I am so glad that this horrible session is over. Now those petty children can go back to their homes and Sarah can make her progress(both at the state level and the national level) unimpeded.
IMO Newt has lost the fire in his belly for politics and wants to be considered a "statesman." IMO McCain had the same problem - they think if they "play nice" the Left will do the same - WRONG. He also may have seen his invite to give the speech when Palin wasn't available either as a blow to his ego or proof that he's still got a place in the GOP, especially after they made such a big deal about getting him.
I am also less charitable and think this was a sexist comment - implying that a woman "shouldn't want to put her family" through the nastiness of politics.
I don't understand why any GOP should be discouraging any potential from throwing their hat in the ring. Gov Palin will have to compete in the primaries just like everyone else. If her nay-sayers are right and she's not the party's choice - she won't get nominated. But it's early, why shouldn't she have the same right as the others to be considered? If someone doesn't want to endorse her when we actually get to that point - fine. Discouraging talk by possible competitors comes across as jealousy - not concern for her. If they weren't worried they'd just ignore her like many ignored R Paul.
Post a Comment