Thursday, June 11, 2009

TransCanada and Exxon Join Forces on the Natural Gas Pipeline to the Lower 48 - Major Victory for the Palin Administration! UPDATE: Palin Interview



Alaska Governor Sarah Palin celebrates a landmark agreement between TransCanada and ExxonMobil to partner together in building Alaska’s natural gas pipeline – the largest and most complex construction project in North America. Governor Palin, center, is joined by (left to right) Marty Massey, Joint interest Manager for Exxon Mobil; Alaska Department of Natural Resources Deputy Commissioner Marty Rutherford; Rich Krueger, President of Exxon Mobil Production Company; Hal Kvisle, President and CEO of TransCanada Corporation; and Dennis McConaghy, Executive Vice-President of Pipeline Strategy and Development.


This is a major victory for the Palin Pipeline, and yes, that is what we are calling it -- the Palin Pipeline!

The News-Miner reports:

Exxon and TransCanada say they have reached a deal to work on an Alaska natural gas pipeline.

The announcement said in part:

"TransCanada Alaska Company, LLC and subsidiaries of Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. will remain the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) licensees and TransCanada will continue as the primary point of contact with the State of Alaska and the general public for this project.

"As TransCanada and ExxonMobil work together with the goal of successfully advancing a pipeline project, the AGIA contract obligations of TransCanada to the State remain unaffected."

What is not clear from the announcement is whether Exxon would be part of the AGIA "obligations of TransCanada to the state."

Update: TransCanada's press release:

ANCHORAGE, Alaska – June 11, 2009 – TransCanada Corporation (TSX, NYSE: TRP) (TransCanada) today announced that TransCanada and ExxonMobil have reached an agreement to work together on an Alaska gas pipeline.

TransCanada’s Alaska Pipeline Project is designed to deliver a reliable and secure source of clean energy to markets for decades to come. With an initial forecasted capital cost of US$26 billion, the project would provide a variety of benefits to Alaska and Canada, as well as the rest of the United States, including substantial revenues, jobs, business opportunities and new, long-term stable supplies of natural gas.

“TransCanada’s Alaska Pipeline Project will connect Alaska’s natural gas resource to new markets. We are pleased that TransCanada and ExxonMobil have reached agreement on initial project terms to progress this exciting initiative,” said Hal Kvisle, TransCanada president and chief executive officer. “TransCanada envisions that our combined activities with ExxonMobil, along with the support of the State of Alaska, the U.S. and Canadian governments, and other interested parties, will result in the timely completion of the project. Today’s announcement is an important step toward that goal.”

Rich Kruger, president of ExxonMobil Production Company, said, “ExxonMobil and TransCanada have the experience, expertise and financial capability to undertake this project. We have on-the-ground knowledge of Alaska and Canada, experience working in the Arctic, a strong history of technology and innovation, and the proven ability to build and operate projects of enormous scale in the most challenging environments.”

TransCanada Alaska Company, LLC and subsidiaries of Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd. will remain the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) licensees and TransCanada will continue as the primary point of contact with the State of Alaska and the general public for this project. As TransCanada and ExxonMobil work together with the goal of successfully advancing a pipeline project, the AGIA contract obligations of TransCanada to the State remain unaffected.

In November 2007, TransCanada Alaska and Foothills jointly submitted an application under AGIA to build a 4.5 billion cubic feet per day 48-inch diameter natural gas pipeline running approximately 2,700 kilometres (1,700 miles) from a new natural gas treatment plant at Prudhoe Bay on Alaska’s North Slope to Alberta, Canada with an LNG option to deliver gas supplies to a liquefaction facility at Valdez. In December 2008, TransCanada was awarded the AGIA license after prevailing in an open and transparent competitive bid process and receiving the approval of the Alaska legislature. TransCanada has moved forward with project development, which includes engineering, environmental reviews, Alaska Native and Canadian Aboriginal engagement, and commercial work to conclude an initial binding open season by July 2010.

Update II: Tweets from Governor Palin:

Info on today's announcement re: deal reached by TransCanada & ExxonMobil thru AGIA. Historic deal & day in AK & US energy history. (@ about 11:00 a.m. AKDT)

Here's link to presser & photos re: TC/Exxon partnership. http://www.gov.state.ak.us/news.php?id=1901 & http://gov.state.ak.us/large_photo.php?id=343. (@ about 11:10 a.m. AKDT)

For previous coverage of AGIA, please read here, here, here, and for an explanation of AGIA read “AGIA Lives!”.

Update III: Press release from the governor's office:

Historic Agreement Moves AGIA Forward Governor Applauds Private-Sector Alignment

June 11, 2009, Dallas, Texas - TransCanada Corporation and ExxonMobil announced today they have reached terms on a gas pipeline development agreement. TransCanada and ExxonMobil have agreed to work together to progress the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act (AGIA) Gas Pipeline Project.

AGIA was created as a commercial vehicle for advancing the Alaska gas pipeline project through the first stages of development of what will be the largest private energy project in the world. "In a volatile world with growing energy needs, the time is now to develop Alaska's valuable resource for the environment, economy and national security,” Governor Palin said. She further described this historic announcement as “very encouraging and exciting, but certainly no surprise, because AGIA was crafted to allow just this type of commercial alignment to take place.”

For the State of Alaska and Alaskans, the owners of the North Slope’s world-class hydrocarbon resources, this event represents progress on this long lead-time project. Once construction begins, Alaska will experience economic growth not seen in over a generation, including potentially thousands of jobs created through construction of an open-access pipeline, as well as significant revenues generated from the production and sale of the gas.

Governor Palin said, “The Legislature voted in support of AGIA and subsequently supported issuing TransCanada the AGIA License because the legislators recognized the importance of this investment to our state’s economic future. AGIA and its ‘must haves’ protect the value of the resources that belong to all Alaskans. Of course, we recognize that this step is not the end of the AGIA process, but it is the natural evolution for a project of this magnitude.” Wednesday in Dallas, Governor Palin met with Hal Kvisle, TransCanada president, and Rich Kruger, president of ExxonMobil Production Company, to discuss the proposed alignment. Governor Palin said, “The meeting not only confirmed TransCanada’s commitment to the AGIA License, but also ExxonMobil’s commitment to continue to advance the Alaska Gasline project with TransCanada, including as additional alignments are reached with other stakeholders.” For TransCanada and ExxonMobil, the alignment provides a mutual benefit by bringing together the key skills of two world-class companies to effectively advance a project of maximum value and mutual benefit. For other producer and explorer companies, this project ensures their discovered resources can be transported to market, and at the lowest reasonable transportation cost. For America, this announcement means an affordable and clean source of energy is on its way and that, as a nation, we are much closer to domestic energy independence. “ExxonMobil recognizes that the State of Alaska has set a course for commercializing the North Slope’s trillions of cubic feet of known natural gas reserves,” the governor said. “By recognizing the value of Alaska’s relationship with TransCanada, ExxonMobil has made a strategic decision that I believe makes good sense. Alaskans will also be pleased to know that TransCanada’s obligations to the state as the AGIA licensee are 100 percent intact and unaltered by this alignment with ExxonMobil,” a fact that was echoed by Kvisle. AGIA involved an open and competitive bidding process and resulted in granting a license to TransCanada to move the project forward through one or more Open Seasons and eventual FERC certification. By providing matching funds during the risky development phase of this project, the state has secured commitments from TransCanada to conduct an Open Season by 2010.

The mandated commercial provisions of the AGIA License also protect the long-term interests of the state by ensuring that pipeline transportation tariffs will remain low. This will protect the “net back” value of the state’s natural gas, which will provide Alaska’s economic base for future generations. These same provisions guarantee that new gas discoveries will be provided access to the pipeline and that any expansions of the pipeline will not result in tariffs that unduly burden new explorers for gas. The next major milestone in the AGIA process is the 2010 Open Season, slated to begin sometime in the second quarter of 2010. The regulatory, design, engineering and cost work leading up to this, and the feedback received in the form of commitments made, will play an important role in continuing the progress made to date.

AGIA Facts:

* Governor Palin introduced Alaskans to AGIA in January 2007, promising swift movement to get Alaska's gas to market.
* Alaska legislators passed AGIA 58 to 1 in May 2007.
* Five entities expressed interest in applying for the AGIA license to proceed with specific commitments from the State of Alaska.
* Private-sector competition created by AGIA encouraged another pipeline project, Denali, to begin down another path to bring Alaska's gas to market.
* Alaska legislators awarded the AGIA license to TC Alaska in August 2008.
* TransCanada pre-filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in May 2009.
* When built, the natural gas pipeline is expected to carry roughly 4 bcf/day, supplying up to 8 percent of the United States' annual consumption.
* TransCanada is a leader in developing and operating energy infrastructure in North America.
* ExxonMobil is the largest publicly traded international oil and gas company.

A copy of the press release issued by TransCanada and ExxonMobil can be found at: http://www.gov.state.ak.us/pdf/AK-TC-EM_ProgressPipelineProject_June11-2009.pdf

A photo from Wednesday’s meeting in Dallas can be found at: http://www.gov.state.ak.us/photos/AGIA-Progress_June10-2009.jpg

Update IV: More tweets from the governor:

More context on AGIA: Here's presser re unveiling of AGIA, my 1st few months in office: http://www.gov.state.ak.us/archive.php?id=170&type=1. (@ about 11:20 a.m. AKDT)

Presser on AK Legislature's 57-1 vote to pass AGIA: http://twitter.com/AKGovSarahPalin/status/2120875388. (@ about 11:22 a.m. AKDT)

More info re: a historic FIVE companies bidding for AGIA license. Landmark progress on project 30 yrs in making. http://www.gov.state.ak.us/archive.php?id=777&type=1 (@ about 11:23 a.m. AKDT)

Final Link: Presser announcing TransCanada as worthy recipient of AGIA license. http://www.gov.state.ak.us/archive.php?id=1375&type=1 (@ about 11:24 a.m. AKDT)

Update V: Statements from Senator Lisa Murkowski, Senator Mark Begich, and Representative Don Young.

Update VI: The ADN Politics Blog post on this announcement includes some quotes criticizing the deal from State Rep. Mike Hawker, whose wife, you might remember, works for Conoco Phillips (who is partnering with BP on the competing Denali pipeline project). The ADN now has a story up on their main page as well, which they say will be updated throughout the afternoon.

Update VII: Gov. Palin is going to be on the Eddie Burke radio show. Listen live here. We will have audio of it later.

Update VIII: Another tweet from Gov. Palin, this time with links to audio and pictures from this afternoon's press conference. Be sure to follow the links:

Audio from today's AGIA press conf. http://www.gov.state.ak.us/audio/AGIA_TransCanada_Exxon_06112009.mp3 & pics from the historic announcement http://www.gov.state.ak.us/photos.php (@ about 4:30 p.m. ADKT)

And one more tweet:

Here's a link to AGIA page providing detailed info on TC/Exxon partnership http://www.gov.state.ak.us/agia/agia_tc-em.php (@ about 8:15 p.m. ADKT)


UPDATE by Daniel: Here's the audio of Governor Palin on the Eddie Burke Show this afternoon:

218 comments:

howIroll June 11, 2009 2:27 PM  

I posted this in another thread but will re-post. We may want to keep a watch on CNN.

Wolf Blitzer goes live in the Situation Room at 4:00 EDT. I wonder if he is going to cover the announcement and that's why the Guv was there visiting him in the CNN studios in NoVA on Monday?

wisetrog June 11, 2009 2:31 PM  

ADN doesn't know where the Gov. is and she may not be part of the announcement:
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/141725

techno June 11, 2009 2:37 PM  

Since the speech in Anchorage last Wednesday (was that only 8 days ago)Governor Palin has been on a roll.

I called for her not to make unforced errors but I always knew that once she realized that she could drive her golf ball down the center of the fairway, avoid the 4" US Open rough, stay out of the hazards and gauge the speed of the greens that like Tiger Woods could and would allow herself to become more bold with her shots, to go for the flag more and make a slew of birdies and an eagle with the announcement tomorrow.

For those of you who follow Tiger Woods you know what I am talking about. Like Tiger last Sunday, Sarah knows when to strike and has the ability to utilize her talent to maximize her output.

CruelaDev June 11, 2009 2:41 PM  

Announcement has been moved back to noon AK time..Not sure if the Gov.. will be part of it..

Maybe she is getting tired of saying "TOLD YA SO"

wisetrog June 11, 2009 2:41 PM  

I sure do hope there will be some kind of media blitz over this. Anyway, I've already posted the news on Hot Air.

Lipstick June 11, 2009 2:41 PM  

This is great news. This is the "baby" of her administration, Having this going forward could sway her to really run in 2012. This was one of the main things she wanted for her administration, wasn't it?


Hope Palin had her Kevlar jacket on in case she turned her back while around Wolf Blitzer.

CruelaDev June 11, 2009 2:42 PM  

Tom Irwin is giving the presser

Yogi41 June 11, 2009 2:42 PM  

howlroll,

I speculated your thought as well. I do believe that is why she met with Wolf, to negotiate the time and tone of this huge announcement.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 2:44 PM  

Can anyone else hear the sound of a toilet flushing on the potential campaigns of Ethan Berkowitz, Hollis French, and Bob Poe?

TommyReport June 11, 2009 2:46 PM  

DB,

To be fair to French (for a brief second), he has always supported Palin on the pipeline but his campaign is flushed anyway.

Poe and Berkowitz are going to have to save face somehow...is someone working on getting all the quotes from Knowles, Hakwer, Ramras, F. Murkowski, Mudflats, etc.

Jenny June 11, 2009 2:47 PM  

Sarah 'Cuda kicking butt! She is awesome.

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 2:47 PM  

I was looking at KTUU yesterday, and someone in the comments section had the audacity to say Palin had nothing to do with the progress on this deal lol. Well, there's one in every crowd.

upinak June 11, 2009 2:48 PM  

Exxon is trying to screw over Alaska.

Due to Point Thomson and the Valdez oil spill.

I don't care if anyone believes me or not...

alwaysfiredup June 11, 2009 2:51 PM  

Upinak:

So is the fact that Exxon is now working on the pipeline a bad thing? Think they will try to screw over other pipeline users and negate the purpose of AGIA? I'd hate for this to turn out not to be a feather in Palin's cap.

baboonking June 11, 2009 2:52 PM  

why would she announce it on cnn? foxnews has a larger audience.

LadySam June 11, 2009 2:54 PM  

Upinak
Do you not support what the Gov has done with the pipeline?? Please explain.

upinak June 11, 2009 2:54 PM  

Yes fire.

How many billions have they had to pay out lately to Alaskans and the fact they didn't do any exploration on a piece of land they have leased for years?

Exxon is P.O.ed, AGIA was going full steam (not realizing they are helping out the probelm) on the LNG pipeline to you all in the lower 48. And Alaskans are going to get the shaft.

nice.

upinak June 11, 2009 2:56 PM  

Lady I supported Sarah on the ALASKA gas pipeline.. as we need it MORE then the lower 48.. for EVERYTHING.

I am at a stand still right now concerning this. My only problem I have with Palin.

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 2:56 PM  

upinak:
Since most of us aren't Alaskan, we probably are not in a place to disbelieve you or say "that's nonsense." However, if you could provide more details about your concerns regarding the deal, it might help those of us who aren't in the know.

alwaysfiredup June 11, 2009 2:58 PM  

What about the "split-off" idea? Surely this can be good for Alaska AND the Lower 48...

upinak June 11, 2009 2:59 PM  

Erich...

I have to link where the State of Alaska sued Exxon on Pt Thompson?

I have t olink where Exxon has still yet to pay out (and has only done a minimal job of paying) to the fishermen and other Alaskan residents on Exxon Valdez?

Do I REALLY have to point that out as it has been in the news? For over 20 yrs in some cases?

upinak June 11, 2009 3:00 PM  

Fired have you heard anything about a "split off" or what we call a spurr line lately?

Nope.. and they (as in the oil producers) aren't going to try either.

I am so mad right now I am tearing up.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 3:01 PM  

Baboonking said "why would she announce it on cnn?"

When is she going to be on CNN?

howIroll June 11, 2009 3:01 PM  

upinak, yes, please explain to the rest of us. I don't see how this can't be a win for AK, too. It will certainly create more jobs and more revenue for the state. Someone/something had to get the ball rolling on this project.

AKReport June 11, 2009 3:02 PM  

why not CNN?

CNN is in the tank for
palin vs obama match-up

RATINGS

wisetrog June 11, 2009 3:03 PM  

upinak, calm down and stop playing the eeyore. Everybody si excited for the Governor and don't stomp on their excitement. We don't have all details yet, so maybe you should wait for the details to come out and do your thing.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 3:04 PM  

Like it or not, CNN is mainstream. Fox News is right wing. More CNN appearances give her added credibility.

upinak June 11, 2009 3:05 PM  

howlroll.... look online at Transcanada. WHo is going to get money from this?

Not Alaska. They are going to higher outside help for this project like they did for the TAP.

And Howl, this isn't a win. The only thing I have heard about a possible Spurr line, is that it would be built AFTER the LNG pipeline was built. So another 5-8 years for Alaskans who need it more? WTF!

Cook Inlet will be dry by the time the LNG pipeline is done... and another 5-8 yrs on top of that. I am glad I didn't get rid of my fireplace as it may be the only way to get heat.

You guys just don't understand. Alaska is getting raped on our resources.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 3:05 PM  

When will she be on CNN? What time?

CruelaDev June 11, 2009 3:07 PM  

Poor Marky Begich...must be licking his wounds under his Senate desk about now. Marky.. might want to hold off on stuff you really know nothing about.

Cuda ...just did an Obama smack down as well!

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 3:08 PM  

upinak:
I'm not Alaskan; I'm in Texas. Exxon's problems with Pt. Thompson just don't make it in the news down here. I'm sorry, that's just how it is. So yes, more explanation is needed, not because I don't believe but because I simply don't know.

TommyReport June 11, 2009 3:10 PM  

The AP write-up is in:

Exxon brought in on Alaska gas pipeline project
http://www.newsminer.com/news/2009/jun/11/exxon-brought-alaskan-gas-pipeline-project/

upinak June 11, 2009 3:11 PM  

Erich.. google.. State of Alaska sues Exxon on Pt Thomson leases. They have helpd them for over 20 yrs.

As for the Valdez oil spill... it is still ongoing.. gotta love Appeals.

Exxon is notorious for sueing and for sitting on things. Just google Exxon suing as see what they did to the east coast as well. Exxon also got sued by 2 oil companies up here for screwing the oil companies over.

I do not trust THIS oil company.

CruelaDev June 11, 2009 3:11 PM  

Upi...

I understand..I am in Colorado...
We have bountiful resources as well.

At least you have a Gov. that gives a rip. Salazar was a JOKE in my State...Now he is a JOKE on a NATIONAL level. You have a Gov..trying to do something..I have a GOV...doing NOTHING!

baboonking June 11, 2009 3:13 PM  

okay i asked a question. i don't know the guv's plans. boy rumors spread pretty quick.

upinak June 11, 2009 3:13 PM  

Cruela... she may be giving wrong direction on this.

The problem you and i have is greenies in Natural Resources.. where they do not belong.

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 3:17 PM  

upinak:
Ok I understand a little better. So you think Alaska would be better off had Trans Canada reached a deal with a different oil company...is that correct?

TommyReport June 11, 2009 3:17 PM  

Palin just put up a press release.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 3:17 PM  
This post has been removed by the author.
wisetrog June 11, 2009 3:18 PM  

Techno, since you are an Atlas Shrugged fan, you must know that this episode just so much like John Galt Line that Dagny built on her own, down to the details of getting financing and the fact that the biggest obstructionists try and claim credit for her Line once she gets it built.

Dind't occur to me before but Dagny's appearance also matches Sarah's, down to the beautiful legs. Today, it's official, Sarah Palin is the incarnation of Dagny Taggart.

CruelaDev June 11, 2009 3:18 PM  

Oh hey Trust me Upi..

I get it.. I am scared that if Dan Fagan agrees with Sarah Palin on Exxon...there is something not to like here. Fat Dan is a big Exxon Guy...I think he wipes himself with Exxon TP...

But I have to look at the state of the USA right now...with Obama in office...anything could happen and I think Exxon is running scared like the rest of us! Who the hell knows what GOD will do next. I am trying to see both sides here.

upinak June 11, 2009 3:18 PM  

Erich.. I was hoping that BP and/or Conoco with Cheveron would have made the deal.

Some actual American companies.

TommyReport June 11, 2009 3:19 PM  

Begich congratulates Palin, ahhaha..

http://www.alaskadispatch.com/tundra-talk/energy/1236-murkowski-and-young-welcome-exxon-transcanada-deal

upinak June 11, 2009 3:21 PM  

You don't feed the thing that bites you.

:(

There is more then everyone knows. You might see it down the road.

howIroll June 11, 2009 3:23 PM  

upinak, I thought BP was headquartered in London, with a British Lord as the CEO?

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 3:25 PM  

upinak:
You're opinion on Exxon is duly noted. I understand that they have a checkered history with Alaska. But, lack of popularity aside, it is an American company. Heck, their main refinery is in Humble, Texas, about 70 miles from where I grew up.

CruelaDev June 11, 2009 3:25 PM  

Well Upi...

I guess you can take a chance on action now or you can sit back and wait another 30 years.

howIroll June 11, 2009 3:26 PM  

upinak....here's my question. The project has been stagnant for decades. Would it have been better to do nothing?

K. Carpenter June 11, 2009 3:28 PM  

I cannot say as I blame you for your feeling upinak. Exxon has been screwing Alaska for at least 40 years.

I would love to see Governor Palin remember the words of Ronald Reagan:

Trust, but verify.

This project is so tremendously large and has such a high visibility, that Exxon will be able to pull too many shenanigans. Exxon will try though. Governor Palin finally got those leases bucked though and drilling finally began at PT. She needs to continue to embarrass Exxon into doing what is right for Alaskans.

latinchic June 11, 2009 3:28 PM  

I wonder if in the contract TC can ditch Exxon later in case things don't pan out, seeing as they have the license?

ZH June 11, 2009 3:32 PM  

Congratulates Gov.Palin!

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 3:33 PM  

Maybe this is why Sarah is trying to forge a solid alliance with Rick Perry...to keep a close eye on the good ol' boy network at Exxon.

narciso June 11, 2009 3:33 PM  

I'm not crazy about Exxon either, than again, didn't BP let that
pipeline leak some years back, due to poor maintenance, which caused the previous big price spike before Katrina. The crew advising her, Rutherford, Irwin,Noah,
aren't crazy about Exxon either.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 3:36 PM  

Erich, that's a very intriguing suggestion.

Prolly a naive questions: Will this prevent partnership with other oil companies or is this exclusive to Exxon?

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 3:37 PM  

I find it difficult to believe that Governor Palin won't have some kind of press conference today about this. This is a huge deal.

Here in Ohio there is no love lost between Ohioans and BP. BP came into Cleveland about 20 years ago and bought out Sohio, which was headquartered in Cleveland. LOts of jobs were lost in that deal.

jimr3 June 11, 2009 3:38 PM  

Congratulations Governor!!

Jim Geraghty at NRO has a post up on this:

"A Big Step for Palin's Pipeline Project"

"Back in March, I took a look at a Portfolio article on Alaska governor Sarah Palin's plan for a natural-gas pipeline. Among the article's criticisms of Palin was that she had effectively shut out the oil companies whose cooperation was necessary for completion of the project."

"One of her defenders credited her plan for bringing "three of the four key players into alignment: the U.S. government, the Canadian government, and the state of Alaska," adding, "the fourth player, the producers, are going to have to deal with that reality."

"Well, today TransCanada (the pipeline builders) and ExxonMobil (one of the producers) have reached an agreement to work together on an Alaska gas pipeline."

http://tinyurl.com/nzjrte

sarah palin rocks June 11, 2009 3:38 PM  

Now that Sarah has brokered this deal and gotten the Natural Gas Line project for the Lower 48 on track, she can now focus on the Alaska in-state Natural Gas Pipeline. Sarah's got momentum and a track record now.

This deal is good for now because it means jobs and more jobs when all economies are hurting. Obama and Salazar will back this project because clean, green, renewable energy is one of their main platforms.

PEC June 11, 2009 3:43 PM  

Upi - Trust me I know and I understand your feelings. But please look big picture. If this Gasline flops that is it for GOV Palin. She would be lucky to be more than a one term Governor.

With that here is my take on what happened. AGIA was fixing to collapse. Sarah needed help and called her best friend in the GOV ranks to talk to XOM. Perry reminded XOM of the honest truth. Only one person can beat the left wing loon Obama in '12 and that is Sarah. As rough as he is on energy companies now how would he be during a second term? Even if XOM takes a loss here it would be short term. With Sarah as Prez can you say ANWR, OCS, Chuksi Sea. XOM is looking at helping Sarah. She is the lesser of the 2 evils between Obama and her.

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 3:44 PM  

Wisetrog:
I don't know exactly what connections Rick Perry has to the oil companies here. However, he's got to have them out the wazoo. He was Lt. Governor under Bush (and by the way, in Texas, the Lt. Gov basically runs the state...little known fact), and he is a Texas Aggie. In other words, I think it's pretty safe to say Perry is a good ol' boy himself.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 3:45 PM  

I'd like to hear from that idiot who wrote that Conde Nest(sp?) article a couple months ago saying she would never be able to get this done.

Liberty June 11, 2009 3:46 PM  

Guys, I know quite a lot about the North American oil and gas sector - having worked on both sides of the border. The reason this is happening is that the Canadian Mackenzie Valley gas line negotiations have collapsed, and Exxon is now moving on with its Alaska gas assets.

Exxon has always taken the position that it wanted to develop its Canadian gas assets in Canada's Mackenzie Valley Delta first. They were quite content to sit on their Alaska leases for another couple of decades before developing them. That is why they did not participate with Conoco/ BP on the Denali Line , or on the TC Alaska line.

Exxon had a 40% equity interest in the Mackenzie line through its 70% holdings in Imperial Oil/Esso and its 100% subsidiary Exxon Mobile Resources.

Since January of this year they have been negotiatiog with the Canadian Government on a financial package to get the deal done. It is now apparent that the project just doesn't make sense financially and Exxon has thrown in the towel on the Mackenzie line and has moved on to developing its Alaska leases instead.

Now they had two options - join Denali or join Transcanada. Don't forget Exxon was already working with Transcanada on the Mackenzie line so they already have a good working relationship. Second, they know Transcanada is the preminent pipeline development company in the world. Conoco and BP are great oil companies but they don't have the internal expertise to build this scale of a pipeline. Neither does Exxon. This kind of work is usually outsourced by these oil companies to comapanies like Transcanada

Therefore, it was a no brainer to go with Transcanada. Also, Exxon gets in on the ground floor - before Conoco and BP come on board to this project, which they will. There are a couple of other reasons why Exxon decided to do this - but this comment is already to long.

But before everyone gets too excited there are still TWO more hurdles to clear before this goes ahead. First, Congress has to approve the pipeline financing bill that Murkowski introduced allowing for (1) an 80/20 debt to equity ratio for the project - which is extremely high; (2)100% federal debt guarantees for the debt up to $30 billion maximum - indexed from 2004; and (3) access to below market interest rate financing from a federal government financing authority.

These three measures represent a huge federal subsidy and potential financial risk for the federal government. In many ways this represents a huge govenment involvement - so be careful when you call it a free market pipeline.

The second hurdle is that TC Alaska Exxon will demand a new royalty and tax structure from the state together with fiscal certainty for the first 10 to 20 years of the deal. So there is much more hard bargaining ahead before the shovels go in the ground.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 3:49 PM  

PEC

Interesting take on that. I hadn't thought of it that way but is definitely makes sense to me. XOM can't stand Obama or his ludicrous global warming BS and they know Sarah knows it's BS too. I bet they will back her generously if she goes for the White House in 2012.

baboonking June 11, 2009 3:55 PM  

mccain defends the guv:

http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE55A6B920090611

Stewart June 11, 2009 3:56 PM  

UPDATE! Unbelievable! The RGA (Republican Governor Association) is running ads at Letterman. They have ads at freaking Letterman!

Flame away to the RGA! Contact TeamSarah and everyone else:

http://www.rga.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=177&Itemid=3

Lipstick June 11, 2009 3:57 PM  

I, too , don't understand. I see that AK being able to sell their natural gas easier would help AK.

Is it that XOM would not pay AK what they should for the gas? Wouldn't that be in the contract? How could payment for a good be held up in court? I see that as much different than them holding up Valdez payment in court through appeals, how can they appeal a negotiaed price?

I admit, I know nothing about this. but it seems to me that getting goods to market would help the economy. Perhaps part of the contract is guaranteeing a certain % of workers hired be local workers?

I live in the shadow of refineries from every oil company you can think of. There has been much plant expansion here. As part of tax abatements etc, they have to hire a certain # of locals, they also have to help our local university with training programs so they cannot say "there are not enough trained workers." It seems to have worked. Valero, XOM, Total and on and on have refineries where I live. There is also a big LNG facility. It has all been good for my area.

Would the gov. negotiate a deal that would rape AK, she seems to be so big on protecting AK. Surely since she has lived there all her life she knows to have certain things written in the contracts. Are other oil companies more honest than XOM? I am not sure about that.

I am confused because I thought AK was held hostage by not being able to get their resources to market, that is a bad thing to be able to more easily? Is it that the gas will flow by AK and they will not be able to have any to use since they need it too? I thought there was so much that there would be plenty for AK and much left to sell in the lower 48?

Hopefully, I can educate myslef on this and understand it better. All I know now is that in my area oil and natural gas refiniers are where most peopl work here. When they do well, we all do well.

techno June 11, 2009 3:57 PM  

McCain is on Hannity's radio show right now!

portlandon June 11, 2009 3:57 PM  

Congrats Gov. Palin!!!

This is a victory for America with Sarah at the helm.

Cuda.

baboonking June 11, 2009 3:58 PM  

so does claire mccaskill:

http://twitter.com/clairecmc/status/2109836029

Lorna Marie June 11, 2009 4:03 PM  

CNN on. wolf will talk about palin and letterman. didnt hear pipeline talk.

Shyann Canon June 11, 2009 4:05 PM  

Well, good for Claire, she finally got something right. I can say this since I am from Missouri. ;-)

LadySam June 11, 2009 4:07 PM  

Upinak,
Surely as much as Sarah loves Alaska they would be her top priority. I can't believe that she would not make sure that her state and not just the lower 48 and national security was a priority in all of this. Don't you think she would have included these in the deal??

wisetrog June 11, 2009 4:09 PM  

OK, the statement says that this is just a beginning and the state's reources etc are all still to be negotiated. I am sure, Sarah will be a hard bargainer.

Greg June 11, 2009 4:11 PM  

This makes me wonder what line of attack Axelrod is planning to distract people from the pipeline deal. Since letterboy did such a good job distracting people from the 20,000+ who turned out in Auburn, and the thousands who gave Gov. Palin a warm reception at the Autism walk, and the IGHL gala, maybe he'll have letterboy make some more jokes, or maybe Geoffrey Dunn will take crayon in hand for another rant. We have to be prepared for some line of attack to distract people from Gov. Palin's accomplishment.

ShermanCT June 11, 2009 4:17 PM  

Can someone tell me how many Porkulus dollars will be used for the largest PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS creator for the coming years?

wisetrog June 11, 2009 4:26 PM  

Tweets are not enough, I hope she does an interview, preferably on national TV. Are any national networks going to cover this?

Patrick S. Adams June 11, 2009 4:27 PM  

Sarah the Great does it, baby! Yippee! Awesome.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 4:29 PM  

wisetrog,
I agree with you in this sense. The networks will not cover this if they don't have to. A story like this will contradict their meme that the Gov. is a fluff chick and not a serious candidate. So, she does need to do a national interview in this case. Otherwise what she has accomplished will go unknown to most people.

CruelaDev June 11, 2009 4:30 PM  

Begich Statement...(while sucking his thumb under his desk....hiding from Obama)

Begich also congratulated the Palin administration for "their persistence in helping get Exxon and TransCanada together in this partnership."

But he pointed out the process is just beginning. "It eventually will be up to the State Legislature to approve changes to state law which may be requested by Exxon and perhaps the other producers to take the gas line project to the next steps," he said. "I believe any Alaska gas line project must provide gas to Alaskans and other benefits, such as jobs and a fair share of revenues, to our citizens."

Bill in Baltimore June 11, 2009 4:31 PM  

jobs created now ! through the efforts of a visionary governor and the private sector !

question: how many years until the gas is consumable ? I'm sure the leftards will harp on that. Even if it's years, at least it is started !

What about black gold ? I saw the recent McShame vote on that, is there any hope for that?♦

Patrick S. Adams June 11, 2009 4:31 PM  

wisetrog, the ADN is a liberal rag. It ran it's lead news story and opined about "where is Sarah." That's media bias. That part should have been an editorial.

For the idiot reporters, if they go to the Governor's website, they will see a picture of Sarah with all the people involved in the deal. She's there with them. I think they're in Dallas.

ADN crack reporters can't stop a lay man like me from figuring it out all from my desk at work. Whew, that was real tough.

Someone tell those ADN reporters to actually do some leg work.

Stewart June 11, 2009 4:36 PM  

http://www.firedavidletterman.com/

By subscribing to the list, you are adding your name to a letter
that will be sent to CBS and all sponsors of David Letterman’s Late Night Show stating that you will not purchase
any product sold by a sponsor of his program until CBS fires him!

wisetrog June 11, 2009 4:46 PM  

Is she wearing the same dress she wore at the NRSC dinner?

Lorna Marie June 11, 2009 4:47 PM  

doesnt seem like wolfe is covering pipeline. just did palin v letterman.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 4:50 PM  

Lorna Marie,
What did Wolf have to say about the Palin/Letterman thing? Was it worth watching? Was the corpse, Jack Cafferty, there to make a fool of himself?

AKReport June 11, 2009 4:55 PM  

Sarah should blitz the media.

Cavuto
Biltzer
Beck
Greta

Just Sayin June 11, 2009 4:56 PM  

This is HUGE. This is what we call "actual accomplishments" lol. Don't worry about the national media for now, let it sink in around Alaska with the haters/usual suspects. Great day for the governor and her administration.

upinak June 11, 2009 4:58 PM  

Sorry all I needed to take a break and take some pain meds. I am not feeling well.

As for the “negotiation” concerning the LNG. It was thought that there would be a LNG to Fairbanks possibly, down one of the two highways, into Anchorage and down to Kenai. It is now from a industry friend of mine.. on hold.

We, in Alaska, are paying out the wazzo for gasoline, diesel, heating fuel and natural gas for electricity and heating. Alaskan’s in general are going to have the same problems this year we had last… 3-5 hundred dollar heating bills for winter, not to mention our fuel for our vehicles. And we don’t have anyway to subsidize it.

There was talk of doing two LNG lines. The original TC line and a spurr line for the State. As Denali and a few other smaller gas companies were arguing on the way it was to get to the Alaskans, it looks like the negotiations have stopped as of now to see what Exxon and TC are to do.

Liberty, you seem to understand the items via the Mackenzie River negotiations but they were just a part of the longer story. Per the native villages that were all for subsidizing and money!

wisetrog June 11, 2009 4:58 PM  

http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2009/06/vote_weigh_in_on_palinletterma.php

Hillbuzz has this poll. Go and vote and vote many times.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 5:07 PM  

Ah, upinak seems to have traded places with me as the official eeyore here.

upinak June 11, 2009 5:09 PM  

wise.. seriously. You don't have a freaking clue as to what is going on.

Thanks for playing.

howIroll June 11, 2009 5:13 PM  

upinak, please know we do sympathize with you re: high heating bills. My winter heating bills run $400-$450 a month and I'm not even "way up north," and summer cooling about $275 a month. In addition, we have a high state income tax and a sales tax currently at 5% but going to 7% in July--even on food and meds!

toughluck June 11, 2009 5:15 PM  

From what I understood form the comments a) Exxon has a really bad reputation in Alaska and b) a pipeline to the lower 48 doesnt solve the gas, natural gas and heating oil shortages in Alaska. did I get that right?
However from one of the videos posted here I think, didnt Palin say that a local pipeline within alaska was also being developed in parallel?

Does anyone have any more info on this parallel project?

upinak June 11, 2009 5:16 PM  

howl.. I can imagine.

I wish other States would get on the bandwagon and tap their own resources. North/South Dakota, Minnesota, IL, Michigan... Oh I can go on per the volume rate of psi methane in those States. BLM needs to open up these areas.

Lipstick June 11, 2009 5:16 PM  

This is all very complicated.

Makes me angry that the MSM portrayed Sarah as dumb. She can walk through all this complex stuff? No way is she stupid. SHE seems to be getting the big oil guys in line. If she were dumb, thye would be lawyering circles around her.

I think maybe there is a shift in the oil companies thinking. I know XOM and perhaps others have been dragging all this out for decades. But we have never had such a liberal, socilaist, green freak president in our country before.

I am sure the oil companies see this and want to get this going now. Obama is on tape saying he wants the coal industry out of business. I am sure he has said the same about oil, it is just not on tape. The big wig oil guys know this. They are scared and see a hard hitting, conservative, drill friendly governor from AK as a good ally.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 5:16 PM  

One rule for thee, one rule for me. Is that how they play the game in Alaska?

When I don't know, I admit it freely. You can ask C4P, they asked me to be a co-blogged and I replied I didn't know much about American politics beyond what I follow on blogs. Unlike some, who pretend to be insufferable know-it-all and resort to bullying when they can't make a point across, I know what I don't know.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 5:18 PM  

OT,
Chris "Tingle Leg" Mathews is going to talk about Gov. Palin after the commercial playing right now. Don't know if it will be about the pipeline but I doubt it. Probably be one of his PDS rants as per usual.

upinak June 11, 2009 5:20 PM  

Wise how about you come to Alaska.

I will show you around, you can see what I am talking about.

I have no animosity to that... I have offered it to others and I can probably get you up to the slope as well as Kenai area wells.

I don't say I am insufferable... But I will say when someone doesn't have a clue about Alaska.

I am sorry you don't understand. I do happen to work in oil and gas. And I haven't lied to anyone concerning it or Alaska.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 5:21 PM  

Tingle Leg has Kathleen Parker on now...

ousoonerfan15 June 11, 2009 5:21 PM  

doug, DONT watch Chrissy has that idiot Parker on. Listen to Hannity for the last 10 mintues he was REALLY strongly defending Palin.

upinak June 11, 2009 5:22 PM  

DB oh boy. Probably the most publicity KP has ever had.

howIroll June 11, 2009 5:24 PM  

upinak...I forgot to mention our real estate tax; mine is currently $465 a month.
Gee....now I'm wondering how I even afford to eat.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 5:24 PM  

Upinak,
Don't know if I can watch. They are on another break since she couldn't hear.

Lipstick June 11, 2009 5:25 PM  

upinak:

I know your frustration at other states that will not tap their resources.

I live close to Galveston. When we go to the beach (haven't this year, IKE did a horrible thing to Galveston) you sit out and see many oil platforms way off the coast.

Driving around my area there are "nodding donkeys" around.

Then I hear that California does not want to drill off their coast? What is their problem? I have platforms off MY coast and wells around me, why are they any better? It is aggravating to me.

California also goes out of their way to have environmental laws to force refineries to shut down. Why do I live in the shadow of refineries to produce gas for the nation, yet other states are to good to have these refineries? Just aggravates me.

But then I see all the jobs it creates here. My Dad worked for Mobil for 46 years so I was raised on oil money. If we did not have those refineries here, there would be little work.

upinak June 11, 2009 5:28 PM  

Howl.. I pay a flat yearly of 3800 for prop tax. SO I am getting close to you. 161K dollar condo though.

I feel for anyone for prop tax anymore. You will never own the land you buy.

Lipstick... california is killing itself.

howIroll June 11, 2009 5:31 PM  

Sounds about right, upi... I'm at least thankful I don't live in Taxachusetts. I have in-laws there---in addition to all the above taxes I've listed, they pay a school tax, a frontage tax, a car tax (which we also pay--forgot that one), and a couple others I can't even remember.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 5:33 PM  

I hate propertay taxes. Mine's just over $4800 per year. As soon as my kids are out of school, I'm moving to a low tax state. I would love to move to Alaska but my wife won't go for it. I'm seriously looking at New Hampshire.

PEC June 11, 2009 5:46 PM  

Upi - Please, I know your frustration but GOV Palin needed a little polictical capitol. She has fought for you and I believe will continue to. If anybody will fight to get you gas do you trust anybody more than the one that got Alaskans that fair share of Revenues from the Oil Companies, Point Thompson opened after how many years, the pipeline started after 30+ years. All good for Alaska. Remember w/o her that gas would still be sitting up there with a few fat cats seeing how they can squeeze another ounce out of you. IF anybody can get you the fuel needed it will be GOV Palin. If she can't you are likely screwed anyway.

upinak June 11, 2009 5:51 PM  

There is a press conf on KBYR on the Exxon/TC right now.

Per the SOA, Exxon is a "joint business partner" but they will not divolge the percentage of what Exxon "owns" of the pipeline.

ErichNTejas June 11, 2009 5:53 PM  

BTW, there needs to be a separate post about Kathleen Parker. Yesterday, she essentially blamed Palin for Letterman's remarks because she "winked" during the VP debate and thus sexualized her candidacy. This woman is truly sick in the head and needs to be brought down.

upinak June 11, 2009 6:05 PM  

Eddie Burke is going to have Sarah on his show and she is going to talk to him about the TC/Exxon line.

JohnDoeAt30Below June 11, 2009 6:16 PM  

I just wrote a check to the Muni of Anchorage for property taxes for almost $10K........only the first half was due on June 15 but I figured I may as well bite the bullet and pay the whole thing.

I almost got in a fist fight with a guy last summer who yelled at me to 'get on the bike path' with my bicycle when I was going down a narrow chunk of road near FM on Dimond. I figured that A. the bike path was in lousy shape thanks to Mayor Begich and B. my bike cost more than his car and C. since I paid a fair amount of taxes that D. I was entitled to use the road.

JeanA June 11, 2009 6:16 PM  

Property taxes just went up 25%, cable and phone went up, sewer voted to go up, talking about raising our state taxes.

JohnDoeAt30Below June 11, 2009 6:17 PM  

And I wonder who feels dumber today, Frank Murkowski or Mark Begich. Both criticized Palin on June 3, talking about the lack of progress on the gas line...

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 6:24 PM  

Upinak,
What time will she be on Eddie's show?

upinak June 11, 2009 6:27 PM  

DB she is going to call in after the press conf. Eddie is on now waiting for her to call in.

So anytime.

ShermanCT June 11, 2009 6:31 PM  

They are waiting for a press conference to get over and then she is supposed to be on.

Caller called in and wants Eddie to ask this question and it sounds like he will with a National Security bent.
"What does it feel to to have done more for the State of Alaska and the United States of America than Obama has done in the past 6 months?"

Probably worth listening to.
http://www.live365.com/stations/kbyr?site=pro&play

wisetrog June 11, 2009 6:34 PM  

Is upinak in secret the id of Shanny Moore? I just read Moore's latest rant at Huff Poo and it sure reads like "uppy" here.

latinchic June 11, 2009 6:35 PM  

awwwwwwwwwwwesome question!

upinak June 11, 2009 6:36 PM  

Wise

Are you in-fucking-sane?

WHAT AN IDIOT!

ShermanCT June 11, 2009 6:38 PM  

Listen up. She is AWESOME!

bestbud June 11, 2009 6:39 PM  

WOW! a big CONGRATS for Sarah and Alaska, this pipeline will be a lifeline for Americas Energy independence from Foreign Countries, "that do not necessarily have Americas best interest in mind".

OH.. what a difference Sarah would have been in Washington.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 6:41 PM  

I'm waiting for C4P to post the interview here. Live thingy isn't working for me.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 6:43 PM  

Too funny. Bloomberg has an entire write up of this deal and they somehow forget to mention the name of Sarah Palin.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=augAyG.9RZ8g

upinak June 11, 2009 6:44 PM  

Wow. Sarah is giving props to McCain.

She is a much better person that i concerning him.

JeanA June 11, 2009 6:50 PM  

This woman is unbelievable, a shout-out to John McCain.

This is why I will always support Gov. Palin.

This is a great woman.

upinak June 11, 2009 6:54 PM  

Tom Irwin and Marty Rutherford will be on next.

latinchic June 11, 2009 6:54 PM  

She gave shout-outs to everyone, even a C4Per!

Kewlness.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 6:56 PM  

I hope that's me .:)

Beware, if its not me, I am gonna strangle the one on whom the divine Sarah has bestowed her grace.

Yogi41 June 11, 2009 6:57 PM  

wisetrog,

I like you and your posts, but you're off base about upinak. She is not a troll and she certainly has been at this blog for quite a while; she also posts over at HotAir.

In no way, shape or form is she Moore or Diva or any of those despicable creatures that live to destroy Palin. upinak has always been a strong supporter of Sarah and she's a welcome voice on this blog.

Please stop calling her out as someone other than who she is: a strong, bold and sassy Alaskan! :)

Lipstick June 11, 2009 6:57 PM  

Heard the end of the Eddie interview. Can't wait to hear all of it here.

Sarah is such a great person. After McCain voted against ANWR she gives him props? Wow!

She has to be on cloud 9. Would love for Katie Couric to call her up for an interview and as Sarah explains the complicated ins and outs of oil business in AK and AK law we could see Katies head explode because there is no way she could keep up with Sarah.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 6:58 PM  

Great interview. She even gave props to Frank Murkowski. She is a lot better person than me. She follows Reagan's mantra that everything is possible if you don't care who gets the credit. Early in the interview, Eddie seemed to be referring to a press conference where reporters wanted her to be in the boardroom. What press conference is he referring to? Did she have a press conference today?

sarah palin rocks June 11, 2009 6:59 PM  

C4p - Can we get this 'Cuda major achievement out there in the MSM and blogosphere so Sarah receives credit? I don't see this up at Drudge or Fox News yet. You can be sure if the deal fell through than the MSM would be all over it. Sigh.

I know some of you have your connections!;)

ShermanCT June 11, 2009 7:00 PM  

PALIN=CLASS and I believe she proves her Gravitas(specifically dignity, seriousness, and duty) in this interview

It is unfortunate that the life of a large percentage of the voting public is about sound bites, not substance.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 7:00 PM  

It sounded like someone named "April" from C4P called in from California. Wonder who that is...

upinak June 11, 2009 7:01 PM  

SPR I emailed Ed at HA, and a few other bloggers. You get it to the blogger.. the Drudge will look for a "link".

Ruby June 11, 2009 7:01 PM  

Congratulations, Gov. Palin!

CodaCuda2012 June 11, 2009 7:02 PM  

Great news about the pipeline.

OT----

Here is my e-mail to the RGA. If they cannot control web ads atleast they could have supported Gov. Palin and her family and they did not.

As a registered Republican I am ashamed my party would run Ads on any thing associated with CBS,
and Dave Letterman. The reason I am ashamed is organization must think it is OK to make jokes about RAPEING a 14 yr. old family member of one of your members NAMELY Gov. Palin. I would hope you would have the common decency to pull all ADs from CBS and David Letterman.

Thank you for your time,

XXXXXXXXXX

All I just recieved this from the RGA.

Coda

Thank you for bring this to our attention. Our advertisement on CBS should now be down.

Best,

Communications Director.

I just wanted everybody to know.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 7:02 PM  

Yogi141, I know all that you say. we've a history together. I'm not sure she remembers but she gave me hard time some time back and I'm returning the favor.

BTW, I post at Hot Air too under a different name and I've been here at least much before than Upinak turned up.

April-Liesel June 11, 2009 7:05 PM  

FYI: I'm the April that spoke to Governor Sarah Palin on the Eddie Burke show. I told him I visit Conservatives4Palin a lot and that I'm going to launch soon http://www.Pro-Sarah.com but it hasn't been launched yet. Eddie Burke's become my Big Brother because we share three passions that make him my PAL P = Palins A = Aces and L = Lakers. It was cool talking to Governor Palin and I appreciate My Big Bro Eddie Burke for giving me this opportunity.

Thank you C4P for setting the bar on Palin websites. Pro-Sarah.com will unlikely reach what you've done. But we will do our part in the Sarah Palin movement. You all take care coz you're God blessed!

wisetrog June 11, 2009 7:07 PM  

April, you're my twitter-buddy. Kudos for speaking with Gov.Palin.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 7:09 PM  

Just posted this at Freep.

JohnDoeAt30Below June 11, 2009 7:10 PM  

April, I have some very serious concerns about you. I am disappointed and a bit discouraged that you post this brand of insight here.














The Lakers????

...vbg...

In all sincerity, thanks for doing your part.

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 7:12 PM  

Great job April and good luck with your new pro-Palin website.

Yogi41 June 11, 2009 7:16 PM  

Good luck, April. And great taste in the Lakers!

I had the Lakers in 6, but then idiot Obama also predicted Lakers in 6... so I changed mine to Lakers in 5. They had better win tonight.

April-Liesel June 11, 2009 7:17 PM  

Thanks guys... I guess I should come out of lurking... lol! Maybe I should join the fun. We'll see. I enjoy reading all of your comments. RAM great job girlfriend. Again you all take care coz you're God blessed! :D

section9 June 11, 2009 7:20 PM  

The time bomb for Sarah will be the Rail Line for NG for Alaskans.

This is a huge, huge win for Palin. However, she will have to start moving, quickly, on an in-state gasline. Upinak's reaction tells me that past State governors have simply let this lie fallow. The voters are going to expect Palin to follow through on the instate line down the line. That's where the population is, and that's where the voters are.

Period. This simply has to be done. There are enough players involved now (Exxon's involvement now insures that BP and Conoco-Phillips will jump in) to move AGIA forward. However, Alaska voters are going to want relief from high fuel costs that they are paying now. They won't want the Lower 48 to get the lion's share of the natural gas while they continue to get screwed.

This will be a political problem for Palin going forward.

KentonAK June 11, 2009 7:33 PM  

Gov. Palin:

Today is your day...

Congratulations and High-Fives to YOU and EVERYONE who put this together.

Your focus,steadfastness and perseverance has paid off for our state.

As you said to Eddie Burke:
"The People Of ALL Alaska Matter To This Administration."

Typical of her servant's heart is how Gov Palin shared credit with everyone:Exxon,TransCanada,our state commissioners,etc...

BUT for all her supporters AND naysayers,this historic day for Alaska (and America) belongs to our awesome Governor Sarah Palin!

CodaCuda2012 June 11, 2009 7:39 PM  

OT---
I just recieved another e-mail from the RGA.

"Thank you for bringing it to our attention. The ads are down. Please feel
free to email me again if you catch any."

ShermanCT June 11, 2009 7:39 PM  

section 9; upinak,

What is the estimated cost of the in state gas line? Why is it being held up?

KentonAK June 11, 2009 7:40 PM  

Truly Ironic Is How Sarah Has Done More FOR America As Governor Of Alaska:

Than Obama Has As President.

And to Obama,The Feds,Sen Mark Begich and The Democrats:

Eat Crow!

(And Keep Your Filthy Federal Hands Out Of Our State!)

upinak June 11, 2009 7:41 PM  

Sherman I think they said billions.

I don't remember the exact number. 13 comes to mind.

upinak June 11, 2009 7:42 PM  

Is anyone listening to the Kimberly mudflats person on Eddie Burke?

JeanA June 11, 2009 7:46 PM  

Off topic but

Posted on FOX.

...There's a saying that out of the heart, the mouth speaks, and Letterman's statement reveals a pretty ugly reflection of who Letterman may be," Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, told FOXNews.com....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525882,00.html

Just Sayin June 11, 2009 7:47 PM  

Can we get Sarah's interview up! I guess I'm late....

lol upniak I did get to hear a bit of Mudflats bs haha

Patty Hewes June 11, 2009 7:50 PM  

I would've cut her off much sooner.

Seriously, That was really foolish of her.

Angela June 11, 2009 7:52 PM  

What did "litle miss mudgurgler" have to say?

AKReport June 11, 2009 7:56 PM  

bunch of crap.

eddie just lol'd at her.

Angela June 11, 2009 7:56 PM  

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2269990/posts

PALIN ON TODAY TOMORROW.

ShermanCT June 11, 2009 8:00 PM  

I was listening to what your tax dollars are paying to defend against upniak. Amazing!

Regarding the rail line. IF, the rail line cost 13 Billion to construct, what is the cost-benefit? I would love to know even the most optimistic return on investment at that cost.

section9 June 11, 2009 8:06 PM  

The LNG Bullet line would have to be built in such a way that it complemented the AGIA line. Economy of scale. If you have two separate projects going on, the cost increases. IMHO, Bullet line only makes economic sense if you fold it into the larger project. Otherwise, meet your new friend, Mr. Cost Overrun.

section9 June 11, 2009 8:08 PM  

Yah, got the news off FR. Sarah to be interviewed by TV from Texas by Matt Lauer on tomorrow's Today Show. Bright and Surly. Sarah needs to be loaded for bear, and should have some bullet points ready on health care, Iran, and North Korea. Lauer will probably want to ambush her.

jimr3 June 11, 2009 8:09 PM  

Off Topic,

I guess hell has frozen over because NOW has a response to David Letterman:

http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/

jimr3 June 11, 2009 8:15 PM  

Off topic again,

Mark Levin going off on Letterman.

jimr3 June 11, 2009 8:36 PM  

Here are the details of tomorrow's interview from Media Bistro.

"Matt Lauer Gets Exclusive Live Interview With Gov. Sarah Palin"

"Where will Gov. Sarah Palin make her first televised response to David Letterman? NBC's Today show."

"Matt Lauer interviews Palin live tomorrow morning on Today. Palin will be live from Texas, where she made an announcement today regarding the Alaska pipeline project. The NBC release says Palin will talk about the pipeline, "her thoughts on the direction of the GOP, and she will address the recent controversy involving David Letterman and her family."

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc/matt_lauer_gets_exclusive_live_interview_with_gov_sarah_palin_118802.asp

sarah palin rocks June 11, 2009 8:42 PM  

Thanks Angela and JeanA for the tips. The Fox News story stated that NOW had condemned Lettermans' comments on their website.

I went to the NOW website and found their statement at the NOW's Media Hall of Shame page.

Here's the link: http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/

Letterman really messed up this time! He doesn't know when to quit. Even liberals are upset with him.

sarah palin rocks June 11, 2009 8:46 PM  

Thanks jimR3!

First time I will be tuning in Today show since Bristol was on. Haha!


AK Report gets her wish! Sarah on live national TV! Woo Hoo!

Al June 11, 2009 8:46 PM  

Another indication of how increasingly popular Sarah Palin is becoming is to look at how fast she is picking up Followers at her twitter page...

She's only been tweeting for a little over a month and already she has cracked the Top 900!

Considering all the thousands of people using Twitter, that is quite an accomplishment, and she continues to pick up followers like crazy1

hrh June 11, 2009 9:46 PM  

April, are you the same one that Skyped with Greta the other day?

Does anyone have any idea which hour the good gov will be on Today? I'm not sitting through 4 hours of that...

Doug (formerly DB) June 11, 2009 9:47 PM  

Off Topic, sorry. Today Chris Mathews tried to link Sarah Palin to that James von Brunn nut who killed the guard at the Holocaust museum yesterday.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2009/06/11/matthews-palin-talking-language-far-right-nuts

Jenny June 11, 2009 9:51 PM  

I love the Eddie Burke interview! I can't wait for Today show tomorrow. I won't be up early enough for that but I know you guys at C4P will come up with the video quick!
You guys have been awesome this week!

Hefmier June 11, 2009 9:52 PM  

Former Governor Wally Hickel is saying that Palin is putting her national ambitions first.

upinak June 11, 2009 9:54 PM  

Hefmier... where did you read/hear that at?

Patty Hewes June 11, 2009 9:56 PM  
This post has been removed by the author.
LindaW June 11, 2009 9:58 PM  

Gov. Wally Hickel had wanted an all-Alaskan pipeline. Palin had said that in the contract for TransCanada, they MUST hire Americans to work on the project.

I also found that Exxon winning the bid was a bit disconcerting b/c of the history of the oil spills and I had wished BP would win since Todd works for them, but imagine what would happen if BP had won the bid. They'd be tearing Palin apart saying she was playing favorites.

So either way, whatever's good, as long as the Palin Admin is happy about it, I'm sure it was a good idea b/c I trust them.

Congrats to Sarah and her team!!

JohnDoeAt30Below June 11, 2009 10:00 PM  

Hickel is 90 and, umm, has periods when he is not completely lucid.

He thinks Palin should force the oil companies to build a pipeline to Valdez. Methinks that if that made financial sense, the oil cos would do that.

JohnDoeAt30Below June 11, 2009 10:04 PM  

LindaW, before this is all over, BP and Conoco will be on board with Exxon, TransCanada and the state.

Oil companies have no favorites and are only interested in money. All of them.

Alaska has to do business with them but we certainly need to be vigilant.

Ask yourself this question: Where did the money come from that Bill Allen/VECO tossed around? Do you think he just dug it out of his sock and spread it around? Long standing rumor here is that VECO was told to overbill BP and the rest and then use that extra money as a slush fund to buy votes.

alwaysfiredup June 11, 2009 10:05 PM  
This post has been removed by the author.
April-Liesel June 11, 2009 10:11 PM  

hrh Yes I'm the one that skyped with Greta Van Susteren the other day. The one recorded was Greta and my second conversation we had and the video went wack. But my webcam's better now.

Here's my status on my facebook:

Here's the video of Governor Sarah Palin & Me on the Eddie Burke show today. http://tinyurl.com/nu6set I was congratulating her on brokering a deal (AGIA) for North America's biggest energy project that will bring energy to the feed America's hungry markets. I will post Sarah Palin's entire interview on Eddie Burke's show tomorrow. Enjoy!

Feel free to friend me and see my McCain-Palin 2008 experience in my pix. On Nov 2nd I had dinner with Sarah & Todd's parents at Western Regional Headquarters in Henderson Nevada. I ate my breakfast on Nov 3rd with them as well. During the campaign I met Rudy, McCain, Dennis Miller... just a whole lot of people. I met the coolest life long friends. All of us would've never met if it wasn't for Sarah Palin coz a lot of us didn't get really involved until Sarah came along.

I thank God I was at the right place at the right time to get all these experiences. You guys can follow me on twitter if you want.

But really I owe all this to God for being at the right place at the right time.

Anyways hrh yeah I'm the one Greta talked to. I don't sound like I normally do in that video. If you want to know me just add me on facebook. If you just ask God and believe in what you're asking he'll give it to you without even trying.

At any rate, I vow my loyalty to Sarah Palin, her Family, her allies, her associates, and whoever she wants me to.

Patty Hewes June 11, 2009 10:13 PM  
This post has been removed by the author.
Patty Hewes June 11, 2009 10:15 PM  

April, What do you think about Parker's article?

Ceejay June 11, 2009 10:21 PM  

Kathleen Parker's article was awful-

Sarah 2012!

Hefmier June 11, 2009 10:23 PM  

Upinak,

Here is the link.

http://community.adn.com/node/141753

Just Sayin June 11, 2009 10:47 PM  

Great Interview, thanks for puttin it up!

Sweet Vindication indeed. I wonder what else she is doing down in texas??

hrh June 11, 2009 10:57 PM  

www.ktuu.com has a vote about which pipeline project you think will succeed.

They also have a headline that Obama declares a federal disaster for flooded Alaska communities.

narciso June 11, 2009 10:59 PM  

Don't you need an overlandpipeline precisely because what happened in Prince William Sound, twenty years ago.According to Thomas Lamb, Hickel wanted to get CNOC, the Chinese oil company involved in the Sudan and GazProm in on the deal. Down here, we have Senator Bill Nelson wanting the filibuster
the tiny sliver of OCS near the
Florida coast, While Cuba is getting ready for some significant oil ventures with China

cudaforever June 11, 2009 11:03 PM  

Fantastic interview with Eddie Burke. Congrats Sarah and Alaska!! Godspeed!!

wisetrog June 11, 2009 11:22 PM  

Oh, this is great. I know Sarah will do great and I hope it s a LIVE interview here they don't get to slice and dice her words. As Sarah keeps doing more and more interviews, it should take away pressure away from her and also help her going into 2012. Matt will not be an absolute pig like Katie, he was good with after election and seemed to like her. But, Sarah take care and don't let him ambush you. Talking about GOP, thwack the beltway types.

wisetrog June 11, 2009 11:23 PM  

OK, now its morning I'm playing one song after another. In addition to 1812, I'm playing Bolero and Finlandia, all in honor of our favorite Governor.

Lipstick June 11, 2009 11:23 PM  

Just Sayin:

I live in Texas.

I hope that Sarah will find herself on a tube floating down the Comal River in the beautiful hill country of Texas just relaxing before she heads back to AK.

She deserves it!

CCRWM June 11, 2009 11:27 PM  

I'm feeling proud even though I'm not an Alaskan just an ordinary barbarian.

I wish this was in the news today instead of Letterman which I think was set up precisely to take attetnion away fron this great accomplishment on Gov Palin's part.

LindaW June 11, 2009 11:33 PM  

I'm slow with this, but if TransCanada/Exxon is to build this pipeline, why is Denali competing for it? Are they both to draw up plans together and present it to someone??? Or how does this work? I'm so confused. Please explain.

Thanks.

LindaW June 11, 2009 11:34 PM  

April,

What is your Twitter page? I'll follow you. Mine is www.twitter.com/onexsturtle if anyone wants to follow me.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP