Friday, July 3, 2009

UPDATED: A Letter to Jonah



Below is the text of an e-mail I sent to Jonah Goldberg of National Review, in response to his piece "A Letter to Sarah":

Hi, Jonah -

I'm a big fan of yours, but I was really disappointed with your recent open letter to Governor Palin. The biggest problem with your piece is that you used a number of unfair generalities and stereotypes without any examples to back them up. In fact, your piece is devoid of even a single example!

For instance:

For starters, every time I see you on TV, you’re whining about unfair press coverage. Don’t get me wrong: Much of it is unfair, and some of it deserves a response. But it’s not presidential. It’s not even gubernatorial. You are constantly taking the bait, taking up the fights your biggest fans want you to take up.

I can think of only one instance of Governor Palin discussing unfair press coverage - this was in her interview with John Ziegler shortly after the campaign. It was done for a documentary film in the specific context of media bias during the campaign. Other than that, I'd defy you to produce any examples of her "whining" about unfair press coverage. I write for a pro-Palin website and follow her closely - and honestly, I can think of no instances where she has done this, other than to offer factual corrections to specific errors made by the media.

Your statement about "peddling a few platitudes and truisms about free markets and limited government" is patently unfair. She's consistently shown through her actions as Governor that these are more than platitudes to her. The most prominent example of a free market initiative from her administration is the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act, but there are numerous smaller examples just from this year. For instance, rural Alaskans, mostly Natives, have faced an increasingly difficult time maintaining their traditional subsistence lifestyle in a cash economy, and faced a crisis last winter in that they couldn't afford both food and heating oil. While other politicos rushed to throw taxpayer dollars at a chronic problem, Palin instead organized temporary aid from private charites, and proposed a real long-term private-sector solution - for Natives to take seasonal work with the natural resource extraction industries. Her administration has since been working hard at connecting rural Natives with prospective employers.

And I don't know if you've actually been listening to the speeches she's given, they are much more than platitudes and truisms. They are substantive. For example, see her Lincoln Day speech to Alaska Republicans, her introduction of Michael Reagan, her speech on life issues in Evansville, or her Seward House address in New York. However, the press narrative of these speeches is to only pull one or two potentially controversial passages and harp on them while ignoring the rest. With the Lincoln Day speech, it was her saying a prayer with her daughter before the VP debate. With the Michael Reagan introduction, it was a ludicrous plagiarism claim after she quoted and cited Gingrich. And on the life speech, it was whether or not she had been tempted by abortion. I think perhaps you've allowed yourself to buy into the liberal narrative without looking below the surface.

So here’s my advice. Stay home and do your job and your homework.

Jonah, she has been doing exactly that! She's been practically glued to Alaska since the end of the campaign. She's made a handful of short trips outside since - here is a complete list:

1. November/December - Attended Governor's Association meetings in Nov. and Dec. 2008 (one with President Obama), including one day campaigning for Saxby Chambliss in Georgia
2. January - Attended Alfalfa Club Dinner
3. April - Gave a speech on life issues in Evansville, Indiana
4. June - Spoke at William Seward event in Auburn, NY; attended charity event on Long Island, attended NRCC/NRSC fundraiser, pipeline negotiations with Exxon in Texas (all on one trip)
5. June - Trip to Kosovo, Germany to visit troops

That's it! Exactly how much more should she be staying home? And when she does stay home, other Republicans are sniping because she's not attending their fundraising events. And she's clearly doing her "homework" - even Fred Malek states that she's been doing things like meeting with Carlucci and Talbott.

I normally have a tremendous respect for your opinion, but your piece, while couched in the format of helpful advice, is actually seemingly (at least to me) an attempt to belittle and demean the Governor (especially in its use of language - "laughingstock", "whining", "peddling...platitudes").

What's astonishing to me is that Governor Palin has never issued a public breath of criticism about another national Republican figure, showing that she has a perfect understanding of Reagan's Eleventh Commandment. But the Eleventh Commandment seems to have been completely forgotten by everyone else in the GOP. If you want to build up Romney, Daniels, Jindal, etc - hey, go for it! If you think they're the future of the GOP, God bless you. But please refrain from tearing down other Republicans in the process, especially without any concrete basis for your criticism.

UPDATE: Please see Joshua Livestro's much better response to Jonah Goldberg here. Also, be sure to check out the response by our reader 'wisetrog' in the comments of this thread.

UPDATE II: Jonah Goldberg has responded at The Corner:

What this reader, and many others, fail to understand is that I haven't written columns like this about other candidates is because I either don't think they need the advice (Romney) or because I have no interest in seeing them succeed (Huckabee).

Unfortunately he didn't respond directly to C4P. Instead he seems to take pleasure in quoting people who were, shall we say, a little more uninhibited in their opinion-voicing.

Romney doesn't need advice? Hmmmm - OK. Yeah, he's been so incredibly successful - especially in that whole primary thing with McCain and in connecting with the grassroots of the party. And, as many commenters have expressed, if Jonah was really interested in helping, he would have offered his advice privately, not publicly.

UPDATE III: More from Jonah here.

57 comments:

wisetrog July 3, 2009 9:06 AM  

Here's my own letter. Also posted below but this is the right place for it:

Dear Jonah,

You are blowing it.

I am a regular reader of the Corner and I like you as a commentator. You are no Mark Steyn,but your nerdy attempts at humor and pop culture have a charm of their own. You usually comes across as a stoic intellectual with a good command of facts, so when you spew out a petulant outburst in the name of giving advice to the Governor of Alaska, which consists of nothing but the most banal bromides about her in circulation, I have to look at you in askance and question your integrity. Where, for instance, is the advice for Mitt Romney about increasing his charisma? His current tanning sessions don't seem to do the trick.

The timing of your column is itself suspect. You have maintained silence throughout the Letterman episode when Gov.Palin did strike back against the MSM but now that she has remained silent through the Vanity Fair hit piece and the subsequent fallout, it's odd for you to complain that the good Gov. is "whining about the media attacks" and "playing the victim." By the way, her favorables with the democrats and Independents increased when she fought for her children against scurrilous depictions of them in the media, so maybe she knows what she's doing.

Then, you say that there is a hunger for articulate policy wonks like Jindal, Daniels and Romney. Really? The policy wonk called Jindal managed to put the nation to sleep in his SOTU rebuttal, the policy wonk called Daniels never managed to interest anybody about his existence and the policy wonk called Romney never manages to impress anyone of the sincerity of his convictions and the depth of his intellect, even after repeated attempts. I don't find these policy
wonks are managing to articulate our philosophy well, much less converting the sceptics. Don't you find it interesting that these policy wonks are never in news except when being used as a foil to the governor by people who don't like her? I do. There's no hunger in the country for "policy wonks" outside of the beltway but then there's no hunger for patrician blood or country club membership either, outside the beltway; there's a hunger for clear convictions and leadership and this, the governor has in spades.

If you were bit more courageous, you'd admit that the GOP establishment reeks of elitism and that the bluebloods and country clubbers don't want someone who hasn't gone to the right universities or doesn't speak in the right accent to be the leader of the party. If you knew your history well, you'd know that there's an ongoing schism between the progressive and conservative factions within the party; "policy wonk" "policy detail" are labels used by the progressive faction to vet conservatives and keep them from power; you'd also know that this infighting happened even during the Reagan-Ford era and that what's happening now seems to be a repeat of it. If you were a bit more curious, you'd investigate why a clique of political consultants is bent on undermining the governor now just as they were on the campaign trail; you'd understand that this is also a philosophical battle for the soul for the soul of the party between heartland conservatives and coastal progressive elites and the governor has become merely a symbol in this fight and you'd try to examine what this means. If you were a bit more sincere, you'd confess that your magazine has been in the tank for Romney and you are looking at the governor through the rose-colored glasses you've put on for Romney; you'd also admit that Romney and his camp are using this subterfuge against the governor instead of waging an honorable, straight up battle; two months ago, she wasn't a viable presidential contender because of her "family dramas", then because of "lack of gravitas" and "intellectual curiosity" and now because she is no policy wonk; there's a clear pattern to these
attacks from within the party, don't you think?

wisetrog July 3, 2009 9:07 AM  

When and if the good governor decides to run for president, she'll offer policy discussions, detailed interviews about international diplomacy and whatever it is that your heart craves for. She'll stand and fall on her own and you will get a chance to judge her accordingly; until then, she's rather busy governing her state with a firm hand, steering it out of recession and signing multi-billion dollar pipeline contracts are no mean feats.


Here's the deal: you can examine the canker within the GOP or you can thrash sarah Palin for exposing it; you can address the machinations and parnaoia of the progressive wing of the party or you can lash at Sarah Palin for
giving conservatives hope. If you can undertake this urgent job, you will retain the label of a premiere conservative intellectual. But if you can remain simply content with repeating adlib nosturms of a second rate political advisor, you'll lose it. More important, you don't deserve it.

Sapwolf July 3, 2009 9:17 AM  

Hey Jonah,

So here’s my advice. Stay home and do your job and your homework.

Leave the heavy lifting us.

(God, what LAZY LAZY people we have in the eastern media. Don't these people ever do research before they write stories?)

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 9:21 AM  

VO and Wisetrog,
Great job...both of you. If it wasn't the 4th of july weekend and I had more time, I'd try to send Goldberg an email too, although I doubt it would be as eloquent as either of yours.

Sapwolf July 3, 2009 9:23 AM  

By the way, Jonah is an obvious country-clubber Romneyite. The piece he wrote (or threw together on the way to the airport) just oozes with contempt.

Another to put on the elitist blacklist.

Shall we start one?

Sheya July 3, 2009 9:25 AM  

But if you can’t surprise your detractors with your grasp of policy when you re-emerge on the national stage,

Not only will she surprise, she'll it you all up for breakfast!

Jenny July 3, 2009 9:28 AM  

Jonah is so wrong in his piece. As pointed out by Videmus, Sarah has not left Alaska frequently nor has she been asked substantive questions by the MSM. How about Jonah call Alaska and ask her some questions.

As for pointing to Mitt, Mitch, etc. Please tell me Jobah how do they know more than Sarah? In what ways? Were they asked about clothes, their kids, etc.? I don't think so. Listen to her interviews before she was chosen for VP. Especially with your colleague Kudlow, Chris Cillizza, C-Span, even as recently as with Wolf Blitzer who actually asked about policy, before he steered to Letterman.
So Jonah make this letter for the media.

Sheya July 3, 2009 9:29 AM  

VO and wisetrog I second Doug’s comments. Your letters are great, some of us can write better than others so thanks for doing what some so want to do but can’t.

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 9:30 AM  

Sapwolf,
The list is a great idea. I have a list of Republican consultant types in the tank for Romney (Mike Murphy, Kevin Madden, etc.) but no list of media personalities. I would start with the obvious.

Everyone at MSNBC including Joe S
Shep Smith
Katie Couric
Brian Williams
Charlie Gibson
Charles Krauthammer
David Frum
Peggy Noonan
Kathleen Parker
K-Lo
Goldberg

I'm sure there are quite a few more. They are all elitists and all either in the tank for The Messiah or Mittens.

Yogi41 July 3, 2009 9:32 AM  

While I agree that these columnists and pundits just naturally gravitate to the likes of Romney and Jindal, based on their pedigree and credentials, I also think that they all want to be on record "giving advice" to Gov. Palin.

So that when she does throw her heels into the ring, and when she does "impress" them with her knowledge, they can crow in their columns that she took their advice.

wisetrog July 3, 2009 9:33 AM  

Doug, is there any way we can find if Romney is paying these people. NRO has been paid by ROmney, I read somewhere. Frum was at NRO, so his sniping of Governor comes with a clear conflict of interest. I suspect somebody is paying him even now. Can we find out?

Sheya July 3, 2009 9:36 AM  

Just wondering, does anyone know how Sarah is feeling with all this? She is a strong woman but every human being has feelings and it’s got to hurt at some point. Maybe someone should write the Governor an open letter of support on behalf of all of us.

wisetrog July 3, 2009 9:39 AM  

Doug n Sheya, thank you.

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 9:40 AM  

Wisetrog,
I have no idea how to obtain that kind of information. Personally, I think there is not a quid pro quo per se, although I have no specific knowledge one way or the other. I think it's a case of National Review employing very elitist writers who are very impressed with a fellow elitist like Mitt Romney, despite his lack of conservative credentials or accomplishments. But hey, he does have perfect hair, a perpetual tan, an ivy leage accent, the ability to speak at length without saying anything, and lots of inherited money and thus, no need to have a job. These are all highy desirable attributes among the beltway elite. How can they not love him?

wilsonpickett July 3, 2009 9:41 AM  

VO:

Excellent job. Your letter was firm and to the point but not heavy-handed.

I am continually amazed as to how little the Eastern establishment folks -- news media and politicians alike -- know about what Sarah Palin is doing in Alaska and what she has accomplished in the past six months. It is almost as if they want to believe every one-sided, anti-Palin meme and then repeat it without checking its validity. What ever happened to doing original research for yourself and talking to people on the other side of an issue to gain a better understanding of fairness and balance, not to mention a little thing called "the facts"? Jonah Goldberg should know better.

A correction for you, VO...... Governor Palin had one more out-of-state trip. She actually went to Georgia on behalf of Saxby Chambliss in early December, on her way to the all-Governors Meeting with President Obama in Philadelphia, Pa.

Keep up the good work.

ranchocon July 3, 2009 9:43 AM  

Ok, here's my open letter to Jonah:

Dear Jonah,

Ef off.

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 9:43 AM  

wilsonpickett,
VO did mention the Georgia trip.

"1. November - Attended Governor's Association meetings in Nov 2008, including a day campaigning for Saxby Chambliss in Georgia"

NoMoRino's July 3, 2009 9:48 AM  

FOUR WORDS: Good job and pointless.

Good job in calling Goldberg out on it but pointless in the sense that JG is part of the D.C./NYC media cabal and they are NEVVVVER going to like Palin. I've been a suspect that JG is a RINO for a while. I think he's a get-along 'Conservative' who will follow the herd.

I saw a program on the History Channel and in it they said that "CRITICS" thought George Washington was not quite up to snuff in the brains department. They said the same thing about Reagan....and now they are saying the same thing about Palin. And Harvard/Yale educated politicians in D.C. have done such a great job for us HOW?

1-20-13, the march continues....THINK NOON!!!

snooper July 3, 2009 9:48 AM  

So when people (on "our side" no less) claim she is "always on tv whining" is it wrong if the first thought that enters my head is "I wish she was on tv that much"?

Just wondering.

baboonking July 3, 2009 9:55 AM  

ummm... i know i'm going to be trashed for saying this but should c4p focus so much on every criticism of the guv. i mean valid criticism is good as it allows people to grow and better themselves.

Videmus Omnia July 3, 2009 10:01 AM  

baboonking, I get you. We've discussed this endlessly behind the scenes at C4P.

It's a judgment call in every specific instance, but in some cases these things simply HAVE to be answered, or the meme is allowed to stand and becomes conventional wisdom.

We have to let folks like Jonah know that their shots will not go unchallenged, and they are taking real risks of alienating the grassroots of the conservative movement.

Ate Mely July 3, 2009 10:04 AM  

Thank you, all in C4P. This is a condescending, ignorant article of a supposedly Sarah Palin supporter, JG. Please don't let them (leftist, liberal Democrats and Republicans, NY/DC elite writers) get away with it.

Sheya July 3, 2009 10:09 AM  

Baboonking
“Valid criticism” is good. But when the criticism is based on misinterpretations and untrue analysis then it’s not valid it’s just someone trying to cash in on the Governor’s star power.
If Jonah’s intention was purely Sarah’s best interest he could have written to her a private letter which I suspect those who truly seek her best interest do. There was no need to do it publicly especially on the heels of the VF piece.

Videmus Omnia July 3, 2009 10:10 AM  

Does anyone think that Jonah was referring to us with his "Palin4Prez" remark?

wisetrog July 3, 2009 10:14 AM  

VO, yep. Ramesh and now, Jonah. Why are they sniping at us? Maybe because we're so darn good at what we do.

Whoa, Baby! July 3, 2009 10:15 AM  

I can think of only one instance of Governor Palin discussing unfair press coverage

You're kidding, right? You need to do some more basic research.

AmeriCuda July 3, 2009 10:18 AM  
This post has been removed by the author.
Tiny Dancer July 3, 2009 10:19 AM  

Great letters everyone! Frankly, I have had it with these inside the beltway pundits giving Sarah Palin advice--especially when it isn't based in reality. As with most of these "self-appointed advice givers" they base their arguments on generalities and never offer up any specifics. Krauthammer claims she speaks in platitudes but doesn't give concrete examples. Goldberg says she whines about the media too much but doesn't give examples. Mike Allen says she's done one disasterous interview after another without giving examples. These critics speak without knowing anything about their subject. I would be willing to bet none of them know ANYTHING about how Governor Palin has run her state or what she's done to encourage free market solutions and energy independence. If anyone needs to do his homework, it's Golberg, Krauthammer et al who keep giving Sarah Palin advice based on inaccurate information and general misconceptions perpetuated by a lazy media. Nice work, Gentlemen. Maybe next time you will give the good Governor advice on moose hunting or keeping warm in the Alaskan winter. Ugghh!

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 10:20 AM  

VO and Wisetrog,
Will you let us know if Goldberg responds to your emails?

Videmus Omnia July 3, 2009 10:22 AM  

Whoa, Baby - Goldberg said every time he saw Palin on television, she was whining about unfair press coverage.

Examples, plz.

wisetrog July 3, 2009 10:24 AM  

I haven't emailed him. Just posted it here. Should I email him?

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 10:27 AM  

Wisetrog,
Yes, email him. Let's see if he responds to any of these.

Sheya July 3, 2009 10:28 AM  

VO
Absolutely, like it or not C4P has become the official unofficial voice of Sarah Palin. As far as I am concerned that’s great. Let C4P run Sarah’s campaign behind the scenes all those so called “experts” and Washington elites are useless anyway.
By the time 2012 comes around and Obama has ruined the country, with all the hype and hope of the 2008 campaign the folks won’t trust politicians and their campaigns spin no more. It’ll be up to guys like C4P to carry Sarah to victory. So don’t be surprised that the next line of attack will come at C4P.

AmeriCuda July 3, 2009 10:29 AM  

Goldberg's piece is clearly guilty of re-enforcing several false perceptions about Gov. Palin, as well as the ridiculous notion that Democrats aren't afraid of her, but I genuinely believe he had good intentions in writing it.
He's a Romney guy for sure, and an elitist, but the tone of the article, to my eyes, though uniformed, was not malicious. I believe he genuinely wants her to stick around and do well.
Jonah's wife played basketball against Sarah Palin in high school (she’s from Fairbanks) and I have heard him discuss his affinity for Governor Palin, not only because of his wife's background, but because he believes Sarah is the only one in the GOP with 'it'. He deserves to get smacked down, and these three letters really are great, but to me, he remains one of the good guys. Come on, he even provided a bit of C4P satire with his Palin4Pres quip! That's a true sign of your influence.
K-Lo, on the other hand, who is totally dismissive of Gov. Palin (despite being a pro-life stalwart) is the true scoundrel that needs to be called out. Ponnuru as well.
That said – strike two Jonah!

wisetrog July 3, 2009 10:31 AM  

I am quite useless. Couldn't find Jonah's email address? Pls post is here, somebody.

baboonking July 3, 2009 10:32 AM  

VO,

okay and for what its worth i too have a criticism with the jg letter.

lets see vanity fair writes a hit piece on the guv and jg criticizes the guv for not being in alaska and studying up, huh?

folks in dc are too much in the echo chamber feeding off each other.

jg should ask how much attention in the media is generated by palin herself and how much by the media?

alwaysfiredup July 3, 2009 10:35 AM  

"President Bush had the same problem you do"

And yet he managed to get elected president...twice!

(...well, more or less twice.)

I agree she has to demonstrate competence. The difference between JG and I is that I already know she is competent. He needs to do his homework.

Videmus Omnia July 3, 2009 10:41 AM  

wisetrog - his e-mail address is in a link at the top of his article.

jonahNRO@gmail.com

john July 3, 2009 10:48 AM  

Great. Letter. There is real talent on this web site. I enjoy it immensely.

Goldberg's op-ed was a thoughtless piece calculated to harm Palin.

My short email earlier also noted the lack of facts and scolded Goldberg to "to sit in the corner and do his homework."

Curiously, this type of snobby criticism from the right helps her as much as the hatred from the left. It has lowers the bar - always a good thing in politics. Ronald Reagan benefited in 1966 and again in 1980 from that same type of criticism.

The take on Romney is also right on. I will never reward those who destroy the best hope for what America should be with my vote.

Colin Cohen July 3, 2009 10:53 AM  

Eisenhower, Reagan, and Bush II were all attacked in much the way Palin is being attacked. They were attacked not only for their supposed lack of intellect, but for their perceived lack of culture.

They went 6-0 in national elections.

The Beltway Republicans are
frightened of her. They are frightened just like the Left is frightened.

They are frightened because they know she could win.

kent July 3, 2009 10:54 AM  

Smarmy, elitist anti-Sarah drivel such as Goldberg's whinneying, above, is precisely why I allowed my decade-long subscription to National Review to expire, last year... and why I now routinely lob all increasingly panicky mailed wheedlings to re-subscribe directly into the garbage, as well.

LindaW July 3, 2009 11:00 AM  

You forgot to include the National Governors Association. She attended the RGA first and then the NGA later. That was when she first met Obama.

gardunne63 July 3, 2009 11:07 AM  

Add Jonah Goldberg to the ever-increasing list of sexists in the Republican Party. That list grows daily.

Current Republican punditry mindset:
"Sarah, bless your little heart, you're supposed to sulk and take it like a woman. You know. Wink Wink. You come off as a shrew when you try to fight back when they go after your family. Just try to be a good governor or something and STFU."

Well, I gotta give the Dems some shout outs. They nailed the Republican Party correctly. It truly is a White, Old Male, Racist party. Note the all-out glee and force with which many Rep "beltway" insiders, mostly unnamed, went after Michael Steele.

wilsonpickett July 3, 2009 11:11 AM  

Doug (formerly DB):

Thanks for attempting to point out to me that the Governor's trip to Georgia on behalf of Saxby Chambliss was already mentioned in V.O.'s original letter.

However, you missed my point. As I said in my 9:41 a.m. blog, V.O. was in error. Governor Palin did NOT go to Georgia in November, as he wrote, on the same trip as she attended the Republican Governors Association meeting (in Florida).

Instead, she made an additional trip -- in December! -- to Georgia (for Chambliss) and then on to Philadelphia for President Obama's meeting with all the states' governors.

I notice that V.O. has now corrected the mistake and incorporated it into his revised letter.

You're welcome, V.O.

You're welcome, Doug.

wisetrog July 3, 2009 11:15 AM  

Thanks VO. Emailed him. Also posted in the comments of HA.

Videmus Omnia July 3, 2009 11:17 AM  

Thanks, wilsonpickett. :)

wisetrog July 3, 2009 11:25 AM  

Thanks VO for your update. :)

section9 July 3, 2009 11:27 AM  

I actually think Goldberg is agnostic on Palin. I don't believe him to be a "hater" like Frum.

That said, he can be converted. Palin will do so, but it will take time and performance.

Edward Cropper July 3, 2009 12:03 PM  

Palin supporters are like most all loyal supporters, they wear blinders when looking at their hero.
Sarah is not Maggie Thatcher so get use to it. She is a great gal with potential but has not got there yet.
This is a fact to any rational person.
Jonah is an arrogant ass who will probably never change. It's in bred in these people.

wilsonpickett July 3, 2009 12:18 PM  

You're welcome, Videmus Omnia.:)

narciso July 3, 2009 12:32 PM  

Well who's to say, was Thatcher the Iron Lady we would come to know in 1975. Is Romney,Reginald Mauldling, or Michael Heseltine, what is to be the standard,since she is a Governor;
and does have a real job,Carter, W.,
Clinton,?

Geedubya July 3, 2009 12:38 PM  

Disappointed in Jonah here. He' one of my faves, but his piece contains fundamental flaws and misconceptions typical of someone who has only gotten their information watching TV or reading .... say ..... Vanity Fair?

However, I agree with some here that he really is a fan, and is trying to give the Gov some good advice. Only problem, in putting forth so many inaccuracies and bromides, his piece becomes more fodder for the true Palin haters to incorporate into their arrogant attacks.

"Even Jonah Goldberg, that great and intelligent writer for National Review, thinks Ms. Palin .... let's just say .... is somewhat lacking" -- Keith Olbermann, Paul Begala, James Carville, Mr. Sunday morning news show host, take your pick.

techno July 3, 2009 12:41 PM  

Edward Cropper:

I agree that Sarah Palin is not at the level of Margaret Thatcher yet, but by the same token the year that Thatcher first entered the British Parliament, she was not up to the same level as the Thatcher who became PM of Great Britain.

But Sarah Palin has the potential to be another Thatcher. And it is that potential that many of us are taking a 'flier' on right now and banking that it will take us beyond our wildest political dreams culminating in the resurrection of a Reagan conservative government and the preservation of America and American exceptionalism as we once knew it.

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 12:41 PM  

Wilsonpickett,
Oops! You're right...it was in December that she went to Georgia. If my memory serves, it was the RGA in Florida in November followed by the NGA in DC in December during which she had a oneday stopover in Georgia to campaign for Chambliss. I think that's what happened anyway.

Doug (formerly DB) July 3, 2009 12:45 PM  

Edward Cropper,

I think Governor Palin has the potential to be more than Thatcher or Reagan. She has more experience and is far more influential than either of them at age 45. Time will tell, of course, but I sure wouldn't bet against her.

Cotton July 3, 2009 1:51 PM  

I find it curious that Charles Krauthammer used the same words the other day on FOX."Platitudes". No gentlemen, that is obuma that speaks in "platitudes" not the Guv..Either Jonah lacks creativity in his attacks, or this is a coordinated effort by Mittens supporters in the media....Geez, supporting the Guv. can really start turning you into a conspiracy theorist.
She's taking shots from all sides. The shots from the right are a disgrace. Once again, yet another day that I'm happy I left the GOP.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP