Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Aziz Poonawalla: Sarah Palin on Islam and China



Here's a review of Governor Palin's Hong Kong speech from Aziz Poonawalla, a Muslim who writes for the Beliefnet blog (I've excluded the parts of his blog post where he just quotes directly from the excerpts released by Governor Palin):

I've been bluntly critical of Sarah Palin before when I felt it warranted, but I've never had anything but respect for her formidable intellect and political saavy. I think she's easily the most credible challenger to President Obama in 2012 and while I still think Obama would prevail, he's in for a tough fight if the GOP nominates her....

But as I said, she's brilliant, and her speech in Hong Kong last week is ample evidence - she's coined the next great incantation of conservatism with which to rally conservatives to the worn Republican banner again: "common sense conservatism." It's far more faithful to conservatism's spirit than "compassionate conservatism" ever was. But more to the point, she actually embodies it - it's not just a cynical catchphrase but a genuine worldview. A worldview I disagree with, but which is not hypocritical or internally inconsistent. She is an effective and compelling advocate for her point of view in this speech, which probably reads better than it sounds.

There are two things that stand out in this speech to me. The first is her emphasis on China...which only makes sense given she delivered the speech at the CLSA Pacific Markets Conference (which as you might suspect has China on the brain). She focused on China as an emerging power, and the ambiguity (daresay, inscrutability?) of its intentions...

This is really a very sound attitude; not one of communist-alarmism or fear mongering, but a strong willingness to engage while also reserving the right to critique. As she points out later, China certainly has no qualms in criticizing us. And yet she is absolutely clear and reasonable about China's potential as a "responsible" economic partner and relevance to regional stability. She also asks a rather insightful question: "How many books and articles have been written about the dangers of India's rise?" The answer is none, of course, and that fact in itself is interesting and revealing.

The second portion of interest were her remarks on the war on terror and Islam....

[S]he sounds positively Hillary-esque! She goes on to firmly express her support for the President's Afghanistan focus and urges him to send as many troops as Gen McChrystal requests. I find her admission that Iraq no longer being the central front of terrorism remarkable (if not revisionist).....

I fully and completely agree with Sarah Palin 100% here. Human rights are indeed universal; there is no "hegemony of human rights discourse". But neither can we impose our system and political traditions wholesale on another society. The trick is to cultivate those values but let them flower in a native fashion, from within.

Sane commentary about Islam (not to mention foreign policy) is extremely rare for a Republican politician courting the base nowadays. Given that Palin is Palin, she is probably the only GOP politician who can get away with taking a moderate tack on the issue of Islam. Perhaps in Palin lies the salvation of the GOP away from the angry fringe and back to the cooler shade of reason after all. If so, it will be irony indeed, considering that Palin played a central role in stirring that emotion and anger in the first place.


You can read the full blog post here and his previous blog post titled "word cloud and transcript: Sarah Palin on common-sense conservatism.

22 comments:

CharterOakie September 30, 2009 6:46 PM  

The excerpted comments are, for the most part, very good!

Her speech in Hong Kong was tremendous.

Tommy Report September 30, 2009 6:54 PM  

By the way, Poonawalla was the guy who brought up the Jindal stuff earlier this year.

ALA September 30, 2009 6:55 PM  

I dont even know what to think about these articles written by lefties.
When they bash her, i dont listen.
When they praise her, i dont care.
His premise is not genuine.He uses sentences like:

...while I still think Obama would prevail.

...A worldview I disagree with.

...Palin played a central role in stirring that emotion and anger in the first place.

techno September 30, 2009 6:59 PM  

I posted this yesterday but if you haven't done it already please go over to read Adam Brickley's article at race42008 called Sarahtarianism and Bob Hovic's article Is Palin a Libertarian and then combine the three articles together. I think you'll get an really good idea what Sarah is about to advocate down the road.

http://race42008.com/index.php?s=
sarah+palin

Nancy September 30, 2009 7:01 PM  

Memo (this is the way we are to communicate in Obamaland now, right?), to Mr. Poonawalla, we have been told Governor Palin is a "blithering idiot", and the only people who want to hear her speak are the people interested in moose hunting. So, you are either an idiot yourself, or you are interested in moose hunting! Fess up, sir!

Sapwolf September 30, 2009 7:03 PM  

Interesting.

"If so, it will be irony indeed, considering that Palin played a central role in stirring that emotion and anger in the first place."

That line at the end though is completely and utterly false and ridiculous.

Sapwolf September 30, 2009 7:05 PM  

By the way, is Beliefnet still a Huckster site?

Bill in Baltimore September 30, 2009 7:07 PM  

very interesting.

it's one thing to fake your way through things and hope no one notices (Kerry, for example).

it's another thing to be right, principled, and doing what your talents have led you to.

God bless Sarah.

She / we go forward on principle and strength of character.

Anonymoose September 30, 2009 7:09 PM  

Dear Leader making a sharp left turn at breakneck speed played the central role in stirring "that emotion and anger."

Cubachi September 30, 2009 7:09 PM  

I thought as well that this is one of Sarah's best speeches from what I've read.
There is no BS, just straight talk, but not the McCain way. The Sarah Palin-Reagan way.
Way to go Sarah!

ladydawnelle September 30, 2009 7:09 PM  

Thanks for this article! Facebook worthy and quite timely as I have been arguing with an avid (STILL) Hillary supporter over there about Sarah. Enlightening him would be a better word (if he actually READS what I've posted) but his final word is "I think it's fine you like Sarah but she's just not my cup of tea as I believe in choice, blah, blah, blah, to which I countered "SARAH is for CHOICE too - HER choice just HAPPENS to be LIFE! DOH! so now I have more substance to post. LOVE it!

thanks

techno September 30, 2009 7:38 PM  

OT:

HA has a thread up now devoted to Going Rogue's #1 ranking

Huskers-For-Palin September 30, 2009 7:42 PM  

Aziz writes....

I think she's easily the most credible challenger to President Obama in 2012 and while I still think Obama would prevail, he's in for a tough fight if the GOP nominates her....

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Ahem, Aziz....I think you need to wake up and smell the humus. Considering how quick the Obama has fallen, three years is an enternity. You need to take off those rose-colored glasses.

narciso September 30, 2009 8:12 PM  

That's a reasonable perspective to take, from his post at Dean's World
and elsewhere, he has been pretty
contemptuous of the right. I really didn't expect this from him

OldDude September 30, 2009 9:35 PM  

All in all, I like the article. The positives outweigh the negatives.

section9 September 30, 2009 11:19 PM  

What he doesn't admit is this: the only reason Afghanistan is the central front in the War on Terror is that the jihadist forces in Iraq were roundly annihilated by the U.S. and the Iraqis.

Art Telles September 30, 2009 11:43 PM  

As Doug Brady Previously Wrote Re: Palin's 'influence' in perspective...

When she speaks, people listen
When she doesn't speak, people wait for her to do so
No other political leader has this power

After I read Palin's entire speech in Hong Kong I had 98.5% agreement... hey, I'm a free thinker like Sarah... and I'm in agreement with Aziz Poonawalla's comments about Sarah Palin on China, with which I have 100% agreement, and about 50% agreement with Palin's comments about 'moderate' Islam vs. 'radical' Islam because the Islam that adheres to the Qur'an has a jihad mindset re: Sharia law that is not compatible with capitalism and the democratic process.

Sarah's commonsense and conciliatory comments about China are encouraging for future detente with China and the debt with which Pres. Obama is mindlessly shackling America.

What is the 50% disagreement with the GWBush administration's position re: moderate vs. radical Islam that Palin articulated in Hong Kong?

"... This is a war within Islam, where a small minority of violent killers seeks to impose their view on the vast majority of Muslims who want the same things all of us want: economic opportunity, education, and the chance to build a better life for themselves and their families.

There is NOT a 'small minority of violent killers' within Islam who seek to 'impose their view on the vast majority of Muslims.

However, there IS a small minority of violent killers' who take Muhammad's words at face value and seek to impose Sharia law on the dhimmi's of the world who will NOT bow the knee to Allah and his prophet Muhammad.

The majority of Muslims simply do not know the ramifications of Sharia law and the taqquia rhetoric that allows the stealth jihad to be 'nudged' onto free America in the courts and the market place with Sharia finance.

Hopefully, Sarah Palin will eventually receive informed counsel by people such as Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, Robert Spencer of JihadWatch.org, Nonie Darwish, Daniel Pipes, David Horowitz of FrontPageMag.com, Geert Wilders, Bill Warner of PoliticalIslam.com... to name only a few.

All of their site links can be found here on JihadWatch.org

Larry Sheldon October 1, 2009 12:15 AM  

It is interesting to dcontrast his report of here speech to what the paid trolls like Skank are told to say.

Larry Sheldon October 1, 2009 10:16 AM  

got to leard to edit better.

Take 2.

It is interesting to contrast his report of her speech to what the
paid trolls like Skank are told to say.

Larry Sheldon October 1, 2009 10:21 AM  

Is Sarah a Republican? Is Sarah a Libertarian? Is Sarah a .....?

What a lot of useless questions.

Why do we worry about how to label her?

Why not listen to what she says, watch what she does, and look at what she will do.

If you like that, support her and stop worrying about how to label her.

And for heaven sakes and ours, stop worrying about how our enemies label her.

Remimber "label" is only a vowel away from "libel".

Larry Sheldon October 1, 2009 10:22 AM  

I write that, by the way as a person who resists being l{a,i}belled himself.

If you must label me, please use "republican" with a small "r".

Larry Sheldon October 1, 2009 10:28 AM  

Larry said, in part:

"got to leard to edit better."

Will I ever learn?

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP