Sunday, October 11, 2009

John McCain: "Tensions" Existed Between Governor Palin and Steve Schmidt



I watched with interest John McCain's interview this morning on CNN with John King. I have been going back and forth over whether or not this is worthy of a post. Ultimately I have decided to post it because it has gone viral on the internet and is being talked about on the cable news channels. In the interview, McCain is first shown a video clip of Steve Schmidt's unhinged rant, previously discussed here, here, and here. After this, King asks McCain to comment. CNN's Martina Stewart discusses the interview:

Former Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain is openly admitting that there were tensions between his former campaign manager Steve Schmidt and those close to former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, McCain’s one-time White House running mate. Still, McCain calls Palin “a formidable force” in the GOP and remains open to the possibility of Palin being his party’s presidential nominee in 2012.

“With a high-pressure situation, there's always tensions that develop within campaigns,” McCain says in a wide-ranging interview that airs Sunday on CNN’s State of the Union. ”And there were clearly tensions between Steve Schmidt and people in the Palin camp.”

Still, McCain said, Palin was an asset to his presidential campaign.

“There are fundamental facts … that cannot be denied,” McCain adds. “When we selected or asked Sarah Palin to be my running mate, it energized our party. We were ahead in the polls, until the stock market crashed. And she still is a formidable force in the Republican Party.”

“I have great affection for her,” McCain continues. But “did we always agree on everything in the past? Will we in the future? No.”

While McCain said he could not predict what would happen in the next presidential election, the Arizona Republican says he is open to many potential nominees for his party — including Palin.

“Look let's let a thousand flowers bloom. Let's come up with a winning combination the next time. … let's all go through the process, rather than condemning anybody's chances,” he says, reacting to recent comments about Palin by Schmidt. “And I'm happy to say we have some great people out there, and Sarah is one of them.”

More here, including video. While this is not exactly an endorsement, McCain does seem to be waking up to the reality, however slowly, that Governor Palin, to quote Chris Cillizza, "is a -- if not the -- prime mover in the Republican Party".

What really struck me about the interview, however, is the fact that McCain finally admitted, unambiguously, that "there were clearly tensions between Steve Schmidt and people in the Palin camp". The likely reason why Schmidt made such a foolish statement earlier this month is to preemptively defend himself against what is sure to be an unflattering portrayal when Going Rogue is released next month.

I remember reading about Governor Palin's efforts to break free from morons such as Schmidt toward the end of the campaign. Schmidt and other "campaign insiders" then accused Governor Palin of being a diva, of "going rogue", and other such nonsense. The following example is excerpted from an October 26, 2008 CNN article:

Several McCain advisers have suggested to CNN that they have become increasingly frustrated with what one aide described as Palin "going rogue."

A Palin associate, however, said the candidate is simply trying to "bust free" of what she believes was a damaging and mismanaged roll-out.

[...]

The Politico reported Saturday on Palin's frustration, specifically with McCain advisers Nicolle Wallace and Steve Schmidt. They helped decide to limit Palin's initial press contact to high-profile interviews with Charlie Gibson of ABC and Katie Couric of CBS, which all McCain sources admit were highly damaging.

Steve Schmidt is an incompetent fool who's practicing some CYA. However, the blame for his absurd mishandling of the campaign's best asset, Governor Palin, rests with McCain. Schmidt should have been fired immediately as soon as the "tensions" McCain spoke of above between Schmidt and Governor Palin were known. This was John McCain's campaign, not Steve Schmidt's campaign. There is no logical reason McCain should have kept Schmidt on board when he clearly did not have Governor Palin's best interest in mind. Her interests coincided with what should have been the campaign's sole interest: victory. In today's interview, McCain seemed to be taking Governor Palin's side. It's too bad he didn't take her side during the campaign, when it may have made a difference.

Schmidt has said McCain's loss was pre-ordained. In other words, he didn't believe in his own campaign. McCain should have replaced him with someone who did see a path to victory. Someone not afraid to employ their best asset, Governor Palin, in a manner consistent with the goal of victory. To use a football analogy, would you hire a head coach who didn't believe the team could win? Governor Palin was (and is) a self-made political star. She didn't need to be "handled". Throughout her political career, she has always thrived when she did things her own way. She has far more experience at winning elections than Steve Schmidt will ever have.

I believe it's fair to assume that Governor Palin will never let Steve Schmidt within a thousand miles of any future campaign. For that reason alone, it's in Schmidt's best interest that she not win the nomination. Anyone who hires Steve Schmidt to run their campaign in the future will deserve the loss they will undoubtedly incur. Mark Levin, in the video below, has some career advice for Steve Schmidt:

If I had been the former chief campaign strategist for John McCain, I think I might leave that profession and be in charge of the French fry fryer at Burger King.




It's difficult to argue with Levin on this. I just hope I don't order fries at the Burger King Schmidt works at. I suspect he cooks fries with the same skill he manages campaigns.

80 comments:

CruelaDev,  October 11, 2009 4:16 PM  

You don't control a Mamma Grizz...You let it do what it wants!

hrh,  October 11, 2009 4:18 PM  

I'm gonna' toot my own horn here and repost my comment from the Open Thread where we were discussing Schmidt's leadership versus Palin's leadership. Here's my analysis:

<span>Exactly, I think Sarah can use this argument to contrast her leadership with Schmidt's as follows:  
 
1. He decided 6 weeks before the end of the game that his team couldn't win. A leader admits it - apparently he did to McCain - and then STEPS DOWN so someone else who still does see a path to victory can step in.  
 
2. As Governor, Sarah saw that she was in a no-win situation between an unreasonably antagonistic and obstructive legislature (IMO this must have broken her heart after their VERY successful first two legislative sessions) and the tiny cabal of destructive citizens intent on handcuffing and imprisoning her from every moving without an ethics violation.  
 
So she looked around for someone who could lead. And she had him in her Lt Gov. So she quiety made personnel moves and appointments, etc., to set the stage, talked to her Lt Gov, and then STEPPED DOWN. So he could lead Alaskans forward.  
 
So Schmidt feels he's in a no-win situation, but for whatever reason - ego, pride, future jobs, cowardice - he does not step down, but in a HUGE act of betrayal to the team stays on as they go down in flames.  
 
Sarah in a no-win situation steps aside so another leader who can move the team (Alaskans) forward can step in.  
 
Does that make sense?</span>

Nancy,  October 11, 2009 4:27 PM  

Thanks for the post, Doug! Great job!

GAHanson,  October 11, 2009 4:28 PM  

It will be interesting to see what Gov. Palin says about Steve "Dip" Schmidt in Going Rogue.  I have a feeling that she will not be too harsh on anyone, but will provide some of the details of Schmidt's lack of ability to let people make up their own minds.

Nancy,  October 11, 2009 4:29 PM  

I knew these huge book sales of Going Rogue, wasn't a vast rightwing conspiracy!
it's Steve, buying all of her books up, so no one can see what a SHmIT, he is!

panchita,  October 11, 2009 4:32 PM  

great article Doug. 

Nancy LOL

crp,  October 11, 2009 4:33 PM  

Breaking ... breaking ...

Palin not a team player. VP candidate uncooperative with head of the ticket ...

RAM,  October 11, 2009 4:36 PM  

Breaking, dateline 2012 ...

When half-term former governor Palin was asked under what circumstances she would resign the Presidency, she broke into a torrent of obscenities and was led away in a straightjacket.

TangledThorns,  October 11, 2009 4:36 PM  

Man, I cannot wait for her book on this subject. I will campaign against whoever hires Steve Schmidt in 2012 or for any other election for that matter.

manajordan,  October 11, 2009 4:36 PM  

No Way, there were "tensions"?! McCain is finally stating the obvious. I wonder if Sarah has let him know some of the things that will come out in the book.

Nancy,  October 11, 2009 4:40 PM  

If only there had been some tension between John McCain and Barack Obama during the campaign!

ZH,  October 11, 2009 4:40 PM  

<span>Great article.</span>

Doug Brady,  October 11, 2009 4:41 PM  

hrh,
Great analysis.  If Schmidt had any honor, he would have resigned.  But he didn't so McCain should have fired him.  Anyone could have done a better job than he did.

Doug Brady,  October 11, 2009 4:42 PM  

I like that Nancy!

narciso,  October 11, 2009 4:55 PM  

I can imagine her own bird eye view of the campaign, as she tried to get them to focus on points of interest, even after the "Joe the Plumber" and was turned away.

Lakerfanalways,  October 11, 2009 4:56 PM  

Sarah is going go to after the bastards in McCain's campaign. She knew they were incompetant, who never really wanted to win. They were a bunch of Romney bots. It is McCain's fault for picking them to help out with his campaign knowing they had no intention of helping him win. Bottom line is, McCain and these staffers are pissed that Sarah was more popular then the guy she was running with and they could not handle that. Schmidt is a buffoon and he is crappig his pants right now wondering what Sarah is gonna say about him

RINO-Hunter,  October 11, 2009 4:59 PM  

Updated list worthless beltway hacks who should be shunned, ostracized, and unemployed for the rest of their lives:

-Steve Schmidt
-Nicole Wallace
-Mike Murphy
-Mark McKinnon
-Matt Braynard
-John Weaver

tim c,  October 11, 2009 5:17 PM  

The real tension was between Mc and conservatives and how he refused to campaign like he meant it.

Sapwolf,  October 11, 2009 5:19 PM  

Damn, time to get to the printing company and bribe some employees for an early copy.

This book is gonna drive most of the news from Nov. 17th through the end of the year.

Awesomely awesome.

terri,  October 11, 2009 5:23 PM  

If you're gonna give kudos to McCain for picking Sarah Palin...you also have to blame him for picking the rest of his staff.
Listen...McCain didn't care 2 sh**s about the campaign, he NEVER wanted to win this election. The party needed someone to put on ther ballot and he drew the short straw. McCain and his "crew" were just pissed at Palin cuz she actually wanted to win the thing and not just show up.

NY59Giants,  October 11, 2009 5:23 PM  

I have been wondering since the book date was pushed forward if Sarah will give McCain an advanced copy so he can be somewhat prepared for the firestorm that is going to be coming his way. Does anyone think so??

Indemind,  October 11, 2009 5:26 PM  

Great job Doug...I love the smell of Napalm coming frome Mark Levin,
after he gets though with a RINO.

Sarah rocks 2012

terri,  October 11, 2009 5:30 PM  

I am really looking forward to Sarah "spilling the beans", but for some reason she feels such admiration/respect/loyalty for John McCain that I doubt she'll EVER talk badly about him or show him in any sort of "bad light".  
Now as for Schmidt and Wallace...they're another story.   :-)

Nancy,  October 11, 2009 5:30 PM  

We need to send Steve a big box of Depends with a copy of  Going Rogue packed inside, right on top.

terri,  October 11, 2009 5:31 PM  

TOUCHE Nancy!...lol

RINO-Hunter,  October 11, 2009 5:33 PM  

I doubt there's really anything to spill regarding McCain himself.  He's a feckless incompetent RINO, but I don't think he ever personally did anything to her.

terri,  October 11, 2009 5:34 PM  

never thought of that!  Maybe that's why McCain is now suddenly chatty cathy supporting (sort of) Sarah and all AND vocally admitting that there were issues between them not totally her fault.

narciso,  October 11, 2009 5:43 PM  

How did Ziegler put it "she loves that old coot" but the staff will get a workover like the swordsman in Raiders

terri,  October 11, 2009 5:55 PM  

"never personally did anything to her"????.....

How about...
Not stepping in and taking care of any "tensions".
Not clarifying/explaining her "rogueness"
Not recipricating any loyalties..ie...having her back through the terrible accusations his so-called "staff" were saying/accusing her of post election?

worst of all...Not saying a DAMN thing to defend her post election, as eveyone and their brother were trashing not only her but her family as well!

I would say McCain certainly did too "do something to her"...and he did it without saying a word! His silence was deafening.

I always thought John McCain was a decent/honest man...besides Sarah, it was the only reason I voted for him....but now all I can say is shame on him.  :( 

  

JeanA,  October 11, 2009 5:58 PM  

Enjoy this one because next week McCain will put his foot back in this mouth.  He always does.

Tom_Ohio,  October 11, 2009 6:01 PM  

He looks as off balance as he comes off in hindsight in almost all the analyses.
I saw a little bit of his interview and I mean he could be the long lost son of the villian that Vincent Price played on the Batman show.
He ( Schmidt ) really has that "arch-villian" look down to a science, what the heck ?
It almost looks as though he wears padding on the top of head !
I would not get anything from whatever drive thru he ends up working at.

JeanA,  October 11, 2009 6:01 PM  

It is because he fought for us.

terri,  October 11, 2009 6:03 PM  

Whatever John McCain says it too little, too late.
I really don't give a cr*p what he has to say anymore.

terri,  October 11, 2009 6:03 PM  

Well....

So did john Kerry. :-)

Whitney the Pipsqueak,  October 11, 2009 6:05 PM  

Haha! If only there was tension between McCain and Obama now!

Whitney the Pipsqueak,  October 11, 2009 6:11 PM  

What the heck does "let a thousand flowers bloom" mean? Unfortunately, there are too many of a certain type of flower (that begins with a "p') blooming in the Republican party, if you catch my drift. Sorry, I don't want actually type it because it may border on crude.  We don't need anymore!

terri,  October 11, 2009 6:11 PM  

Don't you guys just love Mark Levin?  :-D

"bone head"...."ya big dope!"...
"McLame"..."Jerkanator"

BUT, my favorite of all is..

"Stretch Pelosi'..lol  lol  

Nancy,  October 11, 2009 6:13 PM  

Yes! Mark Levin is great!

Whitney the Pipsqueak,  October 11, 2009 6:15 PM  

By the way, I think the name Steve Schmuck is more appropriate.

terri,  October 11, 2009 6:15 PM  

Ha Ha...I was thinking the same thing....just what DOES that mean?

hrh,  October 11, 2009 6:15 PM  

OT, but I just clicked on the Sarah Palin bobblehead and it goes to a blank page on bobbleheads.com.

And I think if I search myself, C4P won't get the $ credit for my purchase. These things usually work that I have to purchase right from the page I linked in to for the source page to get $$.

So can whoever's in charge of bobbleheads check the link?

Thanks. :)

hrh,  October 11, 2009 6:17 PM  

Yikes, is Sarah Palin sold out? Bummer, I dithered and I lost ...

Bestbud,  October 11, 2009 6:17 PM  

Right on Nancy

techno,  October 11, 2009 6:22 PM  

"LET A THOUSAND FLOWERS BLOOM"

Sounds like something a hippie would have said in the 1960's.

karenfromny,  October 11, 2009 6:23 PM  

I saw this write up on Gov. Palin and Going Rogue.  I love this part..

This is very much <span>Palin</span>; clear, <span>concise</span> and straight forward. You don't have to be part of the educated elite to understand what she's talking about. She talks directly to you, not down to you. Americans are a meat and potatoes society, always have been, and always will be and Sarah gives them what they want. In this country a hand up, not a hand out is all that should be expected.

http://www.edistojoe.com/

Whitney the Pipsqueak,  October 11, 2009 6:25 PM  

Perhaps McCain was talking about the LOTUS?

Torrey,  October 11, 2009 6:30 PM  

Some weeds can look like flowers. : )

GAHanson,  October 11, 2009 6:36 PM  

SARAH PALIN: ROGUE RANTS!

http://www.edistojoe.com/2009/10/sarah-palin-rogue-rants.html

An excellent column, maybe even worthy of a discussion here at C4P.

Journeyman,  October 11, 2009 6:37 PM  

I wonder where Nicole Wallace been hiding? After Schmidt, she also will probably have a feature role in the upcoming book.....I remember that story where Sarah went rogue by talking to the local press at each campaign stops ignoring Wallaces attempt to block her from the media.

It was Wallace who made Sarah avoid any media for days and then gave her a high-stakes interview to Katie Couric (Nicole's best friend at CBS), She also was the one responsible for the "Clothing expenses" issue....

Doug Brady,  October 11, 2009 6:39 PM  

Greg,
I have that one ready to go.  Either tonight or tomorrow morning.

KeeleyH,  October 11, 2009 6:40 PM  

I'm glad McCain finally defended Sarah, sort of. I was upset with him earlier for not speaking out against some of the smears from "anonymous" campaign staffers.

I don't want to diss McCain. Sarah loves the man and has tremendous respect for him (even though they don't always agree on every issue). So out of respect for Sarah, I want to try to respect McCain as well.

But his campaign strategists were quite incomptent. The most baffling thing for me was that their team had MONTHS to come up with a vision, a theme, a message, yet they had nothing prepared. While Obama and Hillary were slugging it out for months, the McCain camp should have used that time to get a head start. Yes, the focus was not on them but on the Dems, but they could have quietly plotted their own theme. Instead, the whole campaign felt like a series of last minute ideas. First they tried the celebrity ad, then it was Mavericks...then they had nothing until Joe-the-Plumber came along that they finally had something to grab onto. For a short while they totally relied on Sarah to drive the excitment. I felt it and I thought it was surreal that a presidential campaign had to rely on the VP candidate to win. The only thing the campaign did smartly, was chose Sarah as the VP candidate.

Bestbud,  October 11, 2009 6:45 PM  

Great article Doug!

It just breaks my heart for Sarah.. she knew politics but I can't imagine her HORROR  when she realized her good name and repetition and all she had worked for were going south. The disappointment and shear agony of having given her soul to such a classless campaign.

To this day I would love to read the speech she was not allowed to give on election night.

So many bells were rung during the campaign... so many lies... so much damage, yet she has persevered. 

Sarah is priceless... my devotion embolden ever time such information and the people that perpetrated their selfish interests are outed.

Gov. Palin!... you are in a class called Saints... maybe that's a little too lofty, but It's the way I feel. 

terri,  October 11, 2009 6:49 PM  

well you know what they say..."what goes around, comes around". It's all good, Schmidt and Wallace will get theirs in the end. :-)

OT...
what do you guys think of Sarah's potential upcoming book tours?
Do you all think she'll have them?

I don't know, it seems like it would be too much for the local book stores and such to handle.  There possibly could be tens of thousands of people showing up.
On one of Glenn Beck's recent shows he showed a video at one of his book signings and there were hundreds of people there. They were lined up thru out the store, out the door, and outside all the way around the building.....AND THAT'S JUST BECK!

I've never been to a book signing before, maybe they'll have to hand out tickets or something?

Whatever....my butt will be there!

terri,  October 11, 2009 6:56 PM  

Bestbud I agree.
I was a pretty big fan of Sarah's since her RNC speech, but my devotion was also solidified watching how she handled herself post election.
I don't think she's a saint but I thnik she's a great person with a selfless heart and I will proudly call her my president.

terri,  October 11, 2009 6:58 PM  

Keeley,

You are a much better person than I.
I lost my respect for John McCain long ago. Nothing will get it back short of him shouting on the rooftops, apologizing for how Sarah was treated during and post campaign.

Journeyman,  October 11, 2009 7:04 PM  

I like your passion Terri, I can feel it leap right out off the screen.......

BTW, I do feel that Sarah will do book signings and book tours, but it might be closed to the national media and will be a more personal talk between just the public/fans/fench sitters and her...

Mia,  October 11, 2009 7:08 PM  

Johnny Mac...an his Dysfunctional... Wannabe... Campaign People...
can talk all they want...
They're Loyalty and Integrity Sucked!...Then and Now!
They make Me Hurl!!...
Pathetic.. Egotistical... Self Righteous... Human Beings!...UGH!

'CUDA...2012!!!

ALA,  October 11, 2009 7:13 PM  

Didnt Steve Schmuck tell mccain ,that their campaign has no prayer as early as late spring of 2008.Could they be so calculating to have Sarah as their scapegoat .
They  picked Sarah for VP just to  put the blame on her for their potential  loss.

narciso,  October 11, 2009 7:24 PM  

I suppose that was so, it was such a dispiriting primary, that one was glad when it was over, we didn't want McCain we were forced to get him though. The Democrats really weren't that sold on Obama, by the result of every primary after
the Iowa caucus.

Bill in Baltimore,  October 11, 2009 7:28 PM  

hrh, I have an extra SP bobblehead if you want want. Go to my web site (see my blog profile) and contact me.

Mary Beth (Über),  October 11, 2009 7:42 PM  

You know, my mind keeps going back to the McDonnell article I read here this week...where here we have a solid conservative, like McDonnell...being poisoned by the Vichy Republican influence...who have ceded the argument that Palin is a polarizing extremist.

And why?  Because the leftist puppetmasters have deemed her to be so, her actual record notwithstanding.

This is extremely disconcerting.  If even solid people like McDonnell can be tainted by the thinking that common sense governing is "polarizing" or that we should agree with the labels the puppetmasters give toward conservatives...then what chance do we have?

If however he's just running out the clock, that's another thing altogether.  But I want to know what's causing this shift in their campaign regarding Palin and her message. 

Do the Republicans continue the "let's not do anything to upset the moderates" way of thinking...which has worked SO well for them in the past, or do they choose to stand up for what people believe and want and need...with bold colors, not pale pastels?

Doug Brady,  October 11, 2009 7:51 PM  

Uber,
Great point.  The last Republican to speak in bold colors before Gov. Palin was Reagan, and that worked out quite well.  Ever since, from Bush 41 to Dole to Bush 43 to McCain, nothing but boring pale pastels.

Mary Beth (Über),  October 11, 2009 8:12 PM  

Exactly right Doug.

Why oh WHY does the GOP continue on with the same failed strategy when we have a proven winning formula? 

We had Mr. Moderate as our candidate and he was soundly trounced. 

You'd think people would see this as a repudiation of the Go Along to Get Along strategy...that people would want to create a clear contrast with the left.

Instead you have good people like McDonnell being poisoned with this abysmal philosophy...one that has been proven a failure countless times.

What hope do we have if our leadership fails to understand what seems to be so obvious to the rest of us?

What hope do we have if they ignore what is so clear with regard to the desires and need from the people for solid, unapologetic conservative leadership?

Will we continue to let the leftist puppetmasters tell us who we should and should not support?

TSM Admin,  October 11, 2009 8:12 PM  

I never heard the final on Clothing Expenses, was it Nicole?  I remmeber right after the Election, Fred Barnes of Weekly Standard, was on the FNC panel in the evening.  They were discussing this and Fred sort of did an unplanned comment that he wished whover did it would fess up and he thought it was Nicole Wallace.  The next night he apologized and said it wasn't Nicole, but I never heard anymore there or elsewhere.

narciso,  October 11, 2009 8:19 PM  

Well we have a test case with McDonnell, they were willing to go back 20 years with his thesis, whereas one couldn't inquire about the one's thesis. Similarly Christie is losing to Corzine, in part because of Daggett's insurgent candidacy

CodaCuda,  October 11, 2009 8:20 PM  

I respect Mac military career but anything else for get it. He is running around the country now endorsing and recruiting RINO's. As somebody mention not to allow Gov. Palin to give her speech on the nite of the election is unforgivable.  I don't give two Sh!t was Jonny Mac has to say.

My support and loyalty is with Gov. Sarah Palin and her Family.

Doug Brady,  October 11, 2009 8:21 PM  

If Christie is really losing, I wonder if he'll change his mind and invite Gov. Palin to campaign for him.  If he does, I wouldn't blame her if she tells him to take a hike.

narciso,  October 11, 2009 8:47 PM  

See one tries not to dwell on the negative, but the pattern seems to repeat, Graham selling out to cap n trade, Christie and McDonnell in some ways stealing defeat from the arms of victory, the latter has more of a chance, but why is it even close. McCain still not getting that it was side, that broke faith with the party, who has no philosophical
understanding of what we face, the enemy he went halfway around the world to fight, while their allies were working behind any lines. yet she understood what we were facing, and apparently is one of the only ones in the public sphere who still does

Bestbud,  October 11, 2009 10:45 PM  

Terri

It's indeed the privilege of a lifetime to be boldly associated with Sarah Palin and what she represents... no apologies no regrets, never. 

Bestbud,  October 11, 2009 10:52 PM  

LOL!

Im ecstatic!... knowing Sarah faced Schmidt and others straight-up, don't know why I should have felt otherwise knowing how she did the same in Alaska... it further clarifies the attacks post election and just makes me the happiest guy around.

Anonymous,  October 11, 2009 11:59 PM  

I don't blame McCaind and Shcmidt all that much.  As even McCain admitted, Gov Palin was a great addition, they were ahead, and then the market collapsed and the election was over for all intents and purposes.

It'd be like if somehow everyone on the Yankees gets the Swine Flu and has to go the the hospital for the next week and they lose to the Angels.  Would anyone blame the manager?  Of course not.  That was the main reason they lost and it really totally changed the campaign in a way no other pre-election news ever has.  I can't think of anything that compares.  Especially so close to the election.

That said, I do fault Schmidt for not convincing McCain to oppose the bailout and tie Obama to Bush on it as a last ditch attempt to win.

But Schmidt actually ran a pretty good campaign up to the financial meltdown.  Don't forget, he took McCain from nowhere to the nomination.  McCain had around a 1% cahnce on intrade in the summer of 07.  Below Ron Paul.  He won, beat guys who outspent him.  He kept McCain reasonably close throught the spring and summer of 08 when all the attention was on the dems and when the media had crowned Obama the 2nd coming.  He was within 3-5 pts in a race where he should have been down by 20.  Schmidt actually was one of those who pushed for Palin over Pawlenty.  Everything was going smooth until Lehman collapsed.

None of the stuff like the CBS or ABC interviews or the SNL sketches or anything really had any signifcant effect on the outcome.  George W Bush's historic unpopularity did.  The market losing 3000 pts did.  Being outspent by 200 million dollars over the last 2 months did.  Being out advertised by an unprecedented margin did.  Every tv and newpaper leading every day for a month with stories about how we'd entered the next depression did.  The election being over and Reps and conservatives losing interest by Oct 1st did.  McCain's mediocre debate performances did.  Historic black turnout did.  The GOP's discarding of the hispanic vote over the imigartion issue in 06/07 did.  The continued demographic changes and shrinking of the white vote to its lowest level ever did.  The miserbale shape of the GOP to the point where it had lost Gov and Sen races in OH, VA, NC, and had 13 incumbent Senators defeated in a two yr span did.  I could list another 100 things before anything that she did.

But McCain's answers today were respectable and I don't have any problems with them.  He's still an important figure in the party, especially on defense/natl sec issues and in NH.  I certainly can't see him endorsing Romney or Huckabee.  And I doubt he'd endorse Pawlenty if she runs.  He'll probably remain neutral.  As long as he does that and doesn't do anything to sabotage her, I'm ok with it. 

katiejane,  October 12, 2009 9:43 AM  

I don't really have a problem with McCain's recent faint praise of Palin.  I can even accept his unwillingness to support her being the best candidate at this time.  She has to show that she can win the nomination on her own against other possibles.  However I do have a problem with the fact that he was such a poor marshall of his own campaign that he allowed his staff to undercut his chosen running mate.  He picked her - he should have made sure his chosen staff worked FOR her, not against her.  Whether they liked Gov Palin or not they should have worked to put her and the ticket in the best possible light rather than pre-empting a loss and CYAing themselves.

I don't expect Sarah to trash McCain.  And I am inclined to think that she may not call out the staff by name - rather leave breacrumbs so obviousl that all but the densest will know who she thought undercut her - as if we really need names.

riley4palin,  October 12, 2009 11:45 AM  

Since McCain loves to show up on every single Sunday Talk Show, it would have been nice to hear him speak up much earlier than this (um, like 10 months agao) about his feelings toward the Governor and her viability as a future candidate.

I do recall this was the same man who defended Barack Obama during the campaign when a town hall attendee asked if we should be afraid of Obama.  McCain jumped at the chance to diffuse that question rather quickly.  Now look at our country.

I have a feeling that McCain's internal polls are not looking too well in AZ with the conservative base these days. 

He's a putz.  Sorry, had to say it.

LadySam October 12, 2009 11:56 AM  

RAM, where have you been??? You have been missed!

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP