Robert A. George: In Key New York Race, Barracuda Chews Up Mitt
Another Black Conservative recently lampooned establishment Republican insider Mitt Romney for "voting present" in the NY-23 race. Robert A. George, at NBC's Bay Area affiliate, has taken a further look at Romney's choice to avoid making a decision in the race:
What do you find most often in the middle of the road? Road kill. Mitt Romney, who hopes to be the GOP's next presidential nominee, couldn't bring himself to endorse anyone in New York state's contentious 23rd congressional district special election.
[...]
The conservative grassroots have rejected Scozzava, the party's official candidate in New York's 23rd. It started out with the base in the district as conservatives gathered around businessman Doug Hoffman and that rebellion has now gone national. Sarah Palin, using her unique sense of timing, one week ago became the biggest name of in-prime party leaders to endorse Hoffman. Had she stayed on the sidelines, this contest could have played out in predictable fashion: Republicans stayed split and Democrat Bill Owens would have cruised to victory. Instead, by all appearances, the conservative revolt has succeeded. Even the national GOP -- which had endorsed Scozzafava and was slamming outsider Hoffman as much as Democrat Owens -- is now recognizing that district voters seem to flocking to Hoffman.
Outside observers who want to dismiss Palin do so at their peril. But, there appears to be a reason that her basketball-playing nickname was "Barracuda." Recall she was the one who coined (or at least made viral) the phrase "death panel" during the health care fight during the summer -- forcing Democrats and the White House onto the defensive. Whether Palin is doing all this for PR purposes (her book comes out in three weeks) or being reckless in her political rhetoric, the fact is she is having an impact on the broader debate -- and continuing to resonate with her party's base.
Mitt Romney? Not so much. His voice hasn't been heard during the battle over health care. And then, Thursday he gave the vaguest statement on the race:"I have chosen not to endorse the Republican candidate in New York's 23rd District," Romney told reporters while campaigning in Virginia for Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell. "That should speak a certain amount of volume. I can't endorse our candidate in that race."
Yeah, Mitt, that does speak "a certain amount of volume." It says that you're willing to campaign for a gubernatorial candidate who has had the Virginia race in the bag for months -- but not make a controversial, yet, dynamic decision in a race that would have significant ripples across the country. Palin (and Tim Pawlenty quickly following the former Alaska governor) recognized where the base's train was going and quickly got on board. Romney missed the train -- and missed the opportunity to take a significant role in a tough internal ideological debate that his party is undergoing. Even if Romney endorsed Scozzafava (as former Speaker Newt Gingrich did), at least he would have made a principled decision and could have articulated his reasons for it.
Instead, he looks completely wishy-washy.
Read the rest here. This is particularly prescient in light of today's withdrawal from the race by Dede Scozzafava. When called on to make a decision, Romney's decision was indecision.
(H/T jimr3)






17 comments:
Palin might want to copy this video for future us.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5roHSztCQI
Sarah should head down to NY-23 and clam victory!
Sarah should head down to NY-23 and claim victory!
This is for you Carl Cam.:"Sarah Palin, using her unique sense of timing, one week ago became the biggest name of in-prime party leaders to endorse Hoffman".
sarah rocks 2012
Neither DeDe Scozzafava or Doug Hoffman were mushy middle enough for Mitt.
Rush just made a statement:
In response to the NY-23 news, Rush Limbaugh (who will be on Fox News Sunday tomorrow) tells me: “Hmmm... I thought the Era of Reagan was over? Who was it that said that? Oh yeah, the smart people on our side who told us the only way we could win was with moderate/liberal candidates like Scozzafava. Hmmm...”
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGQ0MmRjOTA5ZDcyYzgyMjJiNjEyMDJkOTJiNmI0YjM=
I said it last fall and over the past several months
- there are more of us than there are of them.
Mitt has sealed his fate. As rush say country club, blue blood repubs, mitt can be one of them but he is not one of us. I liked mitt but he stumbled early against Mc and then never convinced one more voter to come to his side. As a politician he is a dud. He should save his money and return to business.
Mittens neads a Snickers . . .
Newt too.
I find this utterly disappointing and self destructive. Mr. Romney is top notch. So is Mrs. Palin. They are on the same side for the most part. Both fine Republicans who have embraced sound conservative policy. The terms used here, like "blue blood" reminds one of ugly class warfare, and is something Ronald Reagan would never have used. This effort behind Mr. Hoffman was a group effort, and to suggest Mrs. Palin is the only victor is a bit of a stretch. Our Nation has been better served. Now we must get Mr. Hoffman to win on Election day, or the whole thing is pointless. I note Mrs. Palin wisely endorsed Mr. Christie in NJ, who has a more moderate image, and has been making calls on behalf of many Republicans, as Mr. Romney has as well. This is welcome, as we need to grow together to oppose the disastrous Democratic Partisan folly which is sinking us all. Mr. Romney not only endorsed the McCain - Palin Capaign in the last Presidential election, he worked hard for Mrs. Palin's and Mr. McCain's election. The sophomoric 'hate' for Mr. Romney expressed in this regard is not only regretful, but foolishly divisive amongst those who need to grow together. Mr. Romney would make a great President, just as Mrs. Palin would. Both are fine candidates for 2012. To see this support for Mrs. Palin is nice, but to demean others who are worthy in this manner is regretful. Sorry, Conservativism has won a little, in the case of Mr. Hoffman (who is also a Republican by the way...), and we hope that the Democratic Partisan Candidates in Virginia, NJ, and NY23rd, are soundly defeated this coming week. Time to get it together for 2010 and 2012. This sort of bitter hostility towards Mr. Romney, will only push this Palin supporter away. Please, think in constructive terms. Thank you.
Romney lacks the charisma needed to beat obama. Palin has it
This is silly...
Sorry AKREPORT. I think Mrs. Palin would be wonderful and a great Candidate. I don't think I would ever support a candidate just because they can win. I strongly opposed John McCain as the Nominee. But Romney has already polled, after only a month or two with Obama in Office, as being tied with the disastrous Democratic Party President, 44% to 44%. Unfortunately, Palin wasn't that close. Nor, has her poll numbers suggested she can win a Presidential election. She has unfavorable ratings that are just as poor as Hillary Clintons, which suggests there is something wrong with the USA. And the ugly power of the Partisans in the MSM. That recent poll, where some 70 % of those in the USA, who believe Mrs. Palin wasn't qualified for the Presidency was truly regretful. However, I believe she can overcome these poor - misguided perceptions. Also, I do know Mr. Romney has an enormous credibility rating in the Private Secrtor with economic issues. He clearly won the vast majority of the debates during the GOP's Primary, and showed he 'gets it'. He was not going to run away, as McCain did, from the most admirable Republican Efforts offered after 9-11 in the GWOT. His last appearance on Mr. Hannity's show, provided plenty of charisma. He has a great reputation, just like Mrs. Palin. Regardless, the whole point is, belittling Romney is not the way to empower Mrs. Palin, nor are the vapid conspiracy theories thrown around. Both are welcome and positive for the Nation, in their opposition to the DNC disaster. Both will make great candidates. A constructive approach will serve all, far better than the divisive mantra. We have so much to do for 2010 and 2012. And quoting an NBC writer from the BAY area? The same Democratic Partisan leaning types, who only want to debase the best we have in the GOP? I think Mrs. Palin would agree, this is not helpful. Thank you.
To rely on polls this far out is a losers game. This is how we ended up with McCain, how we almost ended up with Dede in the 23rd. We shall see who risks their capital in the movement and who doesn't. What was it that JFK said about "victory having a hundred fathers and failure is an orphan" That he said it after the Bay of Pigs invasion that he helped sabotage, doesn't change the fact
Sarah is the only one with guts and grit enough to actually turn back all the big gov't crap being thrown at us by bo. A Charismatic leader like Sarah can garner the support to return to a constitutional gov't. If you think that there is some one else that's fine but I haven't seen anybody even close.Mitt is a great business man but not a national politician.
Guest: I trust Sarah to be the judge of whether she would be a better candidate then Romney.
If she wants to run but thinks Romney would be better she probably won't run. But, regardless,
and I don't mean and disrespect, you are preaching to the wrong people here. In case you hadn't noticed the title to this site is Conservatves 4 PALIN.....not Conservatives for ROMNEY.
This does not mean if Romney were the candidate we wouldn't vote for him, but it does mean until we know what direction Sarah is going to take our only objective is supporting Sarah. Others have come here singing the praises for Romney and we had to spell this out for them also. WE ARE NOT INTERESTED IN ROMENY AT THIS TIME....MAYBE IN 3 YEARS MAYBE NEVER...FOR NOW....WE ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN GOV. PALIN.....Just remember C4P and you can't go wrong here.
We aren't interested in Huck either or Paul. Just Conservatives for Palin. Period
Romney's indecision reminds me of Obama.
Post a Comment