Monday, November 23, 2009

Maureen Dowd: why can't Obama be more like Palin?



With one week of the book tour behind her and the political wind firmly in her sails, Gov. Palin's fortunes are on the up - as are her poll numbers. LA Times political correspondent Andrew Malcolm was among the first to notice that if the current polling trend continues, Palin could soon be overtaking Obama in the polls. In fact, in the usually reliable Rasmussen poll her favorable ratings are already five points higher than Obama's job approval numbers.

It's enough to drive liberals pundits like Maureen Dowd to distraction. The NYT-columnist even went so far as to ask why Obama couldn't be more like Palin. "It would be easy to dismiss Sarah Palin," she writes. Well, it's certainly what Dowd's been trying to do for the past twelve months. Actually getting rid of her, though, isn't quite as straightforward as she had hoped. And so Dowd is forced to conclude that perhaps there's Something about Sarah after all: "Democrats would be foolish to write off her visceral power." She even goes so far as to advise her hero, the Man-God Obama, to study Palin's approach: "Barack Obama, who once had his own electric book tour testing the waters for a campaign, could learn a thing or three from Palin."

I think she's right, though not in the way she suggests. Contrary to what she claims, for example, his problem isn't that he "so values pragmatism, and is so immersed in the thorny details of legislative compromises, that he may be undervaluing the connective bonds of simpler truths." His real problem is that he is an ideologue who seems hellbent on turning America into something it's not, namely a European style social democracy. The reason Gov. Palin is so popular in the heartlands is that she understands why Obama's approach is wrong, and she's not afraid to say so. "She respects our constitution. She's for limited government, lower taxes, and free markets" is one argument you'll hear time and again when listening to the interviews of people in the queues at her book signing events. Americans like America the way it is. They don't want it to be turned into something different. Palin gets it, he doesn't. That's one thing he could learn from her.

Dowd goes on to claim that "Palin can be stupefyingly simplistic, but she seems dynamic. Obama is impressively complex but he seems static." Apart from the fact that this is condescending tripe, it's also wrong. Palin is dynamic only at the personal level. At the political level, she's not interested in active government - legislation for legislation's sake. As governor, she did what needed to be done, and not one iota more. In fact, the main thing she was famous for during her governship (apart from the ethics reform and the gas pipeline legislation) was her use of the veto pen. She wasn't joking when she called on Obama to veto the $787 billion stimulus bill. There's no doubt that that is what she would have done, if she had been in his position - even if the bill had been produced by her own party.

If Palin is the Mrs No of American politics, Obama is the Mr Yes. Yes we can! - pass new legislation on every subject under the sun. Yes can can! - ram through Congress bills thousands of pages long, without scheduling any time for proper scrutiny or debate. Yes we can! - nationalize whole sections of the American economy. Obama's problem isn't that he's static. His problem is that he's doing too much - way too much. That's another subject on which he could learn from Gov. Palin.

Dowd's final observation is that Gov. Palin "nurtures her grass roots while he neglects his." This just shows that Dowd really doesn't know the first thing about Palin, or about why the average American instinctively connects with her. Anyone who has followed the Governor's activities for the last twelve months will have noticed that she's spent little to no time 'nurturing her grassroots'. While still in the governor's office, she barely left the state of Alaska. Since handing over the reigns to her Lt. Governor, she spent even less time outside the state. The only way she communicated was through Facebook, and even there part of the time she was talking directly to Washington about Washington policy issues. She's understaffed, underfunded (though if the first week sales figures for her book are anything to go by, she probably won't suffer from that particular problem much longer), and underorganized in the early primary states.

The fact that at every stop on her book tour people are still out there in their thousands isn't because they're being herded like sheep to show up when she wants them to. They're there because they instinctively recognize that she's grassroots herself. It's what they keep telling the many journalists queuing up to interview them: "She's understands me. She's one of us. She's like me." That's why they support her, and why many of them would smash through a brick wall for her - or indeed, spend a night sleeping outside in the cold. It's not something you can fake, it's not for sale, and there isn't a political consultant out there who can help you develop it.

What consultants can teach you is a dark art that Obama has already mastered to perfection, namely how to organize grassroots support, make it march to your tune, and use it to fund your operations. But once you've won your election, and your actions in government betray that you never really cared about them in the first place, it's impossible to make them do the same thing a second time. Not out of love, anyway. Obama knows this, so he'll run an extremely negative campaign in 2012 to try to scare his grassroots into voting for him a second time. It'll work with some of them, but it won't work with all of them. Without Hope&Change, Obama will be just another politician.

If there's one thing Obama could learn from Gov. Palin, it's to stop thinking that he's better than the people he's been elected to represent. He should stop believing his own myth (propagated by people like Dowd), come down from his throne, and actually try to see things from their perspective. He would see people who couldn't care less about healthcare reform or cap & tax. They just want him to fix the economy at home, win the war abroad, and keep America safe, strong, and prosperous. As Gov. Palin would tell him, everything else is bullcrap.

66 comments:

Steven,  November 23, 2009 12:14 PM  

Great post Joshua! Nonetheless policy does matter and the problem the GOP has had is that the Democrats have rigged the governmental structure to their favor, whether they are in office or not. The entitlement programs are a means for them to gain greater and greater control of the economic pie and until the GOP fundamentally changes this fact, we are on a glide scope to socialism. The health care reform bill that is being debated will accelerate this process, but make no mistake about it, if there isn't a mechanism built into the national government that favors savings over spending, our future will be Socialism.

I support Sarah because in Alaska they had such a mechanism, call the Permanent Fund. This fund ensures that the government during good times saves for the bad times and provides an annual benefit to the people in the form of dividend payments, that ensures the popular support that have kept the politicians from raiding that fund. We need such a reform at the national level to pay down our national debt and build national savings for future generations. This is where simply just doing nothing and just doing what needs to be done is not sufficient. We need policy that redefines what government should do: ensure the greatness of this country by turning over to follow on generations a nation that's strong and independent, not one mired in debt.

Kjanlady,  November 23, 2009 12:49 PM  

Even that New York dowdy shrew losing hope in Obama?  Don't underestimate Palin from a NYT elitist snob who spent the last year telling the shrinking readers that Sarah was a caribou barbie?  Even liberal elitist snobs sweat....I can smell their stench way down here in the Louisiana bayous.  Smells even worse than the dumpsters behind a seafood restaurant in July in a 100 degree + heat wave.  Tons of shrimp & crab shells & half eaten fish carcasses do have a unique, pungent odor.

So does fear.

JohnDoeAt30Below,  November 23, 2009 1:05 PM  

I'll put this here: Iowa poll came out today, show's Sarah slightly behind Huck........but this poll was taken pre-Oprah, pre-book release:

Sixty-eight percent of Iowa Republicans view Palin favorably. That’s close to the 70 percent who hold favorable views of former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who won the 2008 caucuses, and it’s higher than the 66 percent who view former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich favorably. Palin’s number is also higher than that of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, runner-up in the 2008 caucuses, who is viewed favorably by 58 percent of the state’s Republicans.

Huckabee, Romney and Gingrich are considered 2012 presidential prospects.

“With those kind of numbers, if she were to become a candidate, while it’s not a sure thing, she would be starting out in a very good position,” said veteran Iowa GOP strategist David Roederer, who ran McCain’s 2008 Iowa campaign.

But 24 percent of Iowa Republicans view Palin unfavorably, compared with 12 percent for Huckabee

Although 60 percent of Iowa conservatives view Palin favorably, Huckabee rates higher. Fifty percent of moderates view Huckabee favorably, compared with 23 percent for Palin.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20091122/NEWS/91122002/-1/iowapoll/Iowa-Poll-State-Republicans-like-what-they-see-in-Sarah-Palin

BetseyRoss,  November 23, 2009 1:07 PM  

Now that many of us have read her book, unfiltered Sarah, I certainly understand where she is coming from on corruption in government.  I didn't get it until Sept. 2008 when Lehman Bros. fell.  Someone is pulling strings somewhere.  None of that mess was as fatal as it turned out to be.  Some good decisions here and there and the economy would not be in the shape that it was.  Obama has made it worse with his own corruption and failure to address the corruption that was handed to him on a silver platter.  The House of Representatives and the Senate.  The corruptocrats are in charge.  He is not a moral person.  It's so obvious.  Neither is Maureen Dowd. Reading anything she wrote or the NYT is a was of time and ink. 
However, with Sarah on the pages of the local papers and her large enthusiastic crowds it is becoming clear that America absolutely have people that are in charge that have some moral authority and that they can trust.  Showing Maureen Dowd Sarah's book is like showing Dracula the Cross.  Now there's a meltdown!  Maureen is starting to admit to herself that she gets it. 
This is therapy for her in a round about way.  Will she heal?  Probably not.  These folks are toxic to everyone except their own little circle of Liberal Intellectual Elites.  (check out the acronym)

lonestar,  November 23, 2009 1:08 PM  

I read this article yesterday and couldn't believe Dowd actually signed her name to it.  This was the most bitter, jealous display from an unhappy middle-aged woman who sees she what she could have had but will never admit it.
Sarah Palin is happy woman with a loving husband and beautiful children.
Maureen Dowd is a post-menopausal woman who realizes she will never have the love of children or a husband, especially a good-looking real man!
There, I'm done.

toughluck,  November 23, 2009 1:12 PM  

I think the article is right about the danger of Sarah over emphasizing Reagan.

Actually (heresy on my part) Sarah could reference Clinton once or twice, as the only president in the last few decades to bring the budget under control and put money back into the treasury.

Please understand.. I am a fiscal conservative and could care less about a person's family issues (Clinton's infidelities, or those of that governor with the mistress in Argentina, etc). All I care about (at this time) is bringing the budget under control, and Clinton was a good example.

Why? because after Reagan unsuccessfully asked for a line item veto, the congress was finally gave it to Clinton, who used it... and IT WORKED. Sarah could bring that up as an example of a Democratic acheivement to be emulated (since we must adopt whatever works, no matter form what side of the political spectrum it comes from). And emphasize her own line item vetos and budget history as Governor of Alaska along the way.

It is also due to the line item veto issue that I dont trust nor will I support Rudy Gugliani, which led a fight all the way to the Supreme Court to eliminate the line item veto from the Presidential office, finally succeeding when the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional. This was a stab to the heart of the United States as a whole.  Another example of self-destruction was the McCain-Feingold law, which the Supreme Court also upheld (and now it seems it could possibly reverse, only a few year into it). It was a travesty, the way in knee capped the first amendment. For that reason I was unwilling to vote for McCain (me, a life-long Republican) and only did so when Sarah joined the ticket.

So I think Sarah needs to take on the mantle of the Great Uniter. Unite dissafected Democrats, independents and Republicans by finding common ground and useful lessons even from Democrats, and also by staying away and recognizing that Republican past actions are not the be-all end all, some of thm were very damaging as well.

And fight, fight, and use repetition ad-infinitum on the theme of Uniting America. Repetition works and the label of 'divisive' attached to her (through repetition) must be conterbalanced by an equal amount of repetition that she is the Uniter of the American People under a common goal: bringing the budget under control.

Obama, in contrast to the pre-election hype turned out to be 'not good for the economy' (do you remember that endlessy repeated line?: 'conventional wisdom says that Obama will be good for the Econonmy and McCain will not' Who came up with that brillian piece of propaganda?). Obama turned out to be the Great Divider, some thing I could see from the start from his racially divisive book, always bringing race to the forefront. What does race have to do with anything nowadays? It should be transparent to us as americans by now. Obama by his actions (protecting thet black panthers and that university professor from prosecution) and by his statements has pushed back race relations in the USA back 20 years.

A great floodlight should be shone on Obama and he needs to be exposed as the Great Divider. The Crusher of Hope, the bringer of Despair, the downer of the American Spirit, the great apologizer. Further, as part of his policies of apeacement, he is the Great War monger, as war looms ever closer as our enemies detect weakness in our part.

I frankly I am tired of hearing the line 'common sense cnservatism' which Sarah conciously repeats at every opportunity, but I am savy enough to realize that it is done on purpose, must be done, continue to be done, since apparently repetition works. So I live with it. But the labels attached to Sarah (divisive) and those to Obama [...]

GAHanson,  November 23, 2009 1:19 PM  

Here is the CSPAN video of Gov. Palin's book signing in Cincinatti OH

http://www.booktv.org/Watch/11126/Going+Rogue+An+American+Life.aspx

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 1:19 PM  

good article but I wish some would STOP TRYIN TO HELP ODRAMA be a BETTER Prezeldent!  He needs to NOT read our suggestions cuz I don't WANT him to go up in numbers!  especially if he's doing it more like the phony he is..........  Sarah is being Sarah!!!  That is good enough for me.

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 1:24 PM  

"special interest allies"  WHAT THE HAIL does that mean?  I know of NO special interest group that is allied with her?  Sounds so sinister and demeaning and like she's RUNNING FOR OFFICE!! 

These moonbats need to just quit now before they all end up in prison or in some "bread-line-4-acorn"  quit spitting in to the wind  (they don't recognize GALE FORCE SARAH fast approaching)

LadySam,  November 23, 2009 1:29 PM  

I agree on the point of Sarah becoming KNOWN as a unifier.  The media cannot say her name without using the word 'polarizing' or 'devisive'.  Whatever she can positively refer to in regard to a Dem would be a positive for her.

narciso,  November 23, 2009 1:34 PM  

Clinton 'balanced the budget' in the same way that the healthcare plan is deficit neutral, mostly cutting defense, adjusting the revenue stream,. Let us not forget than Franklin Raines, was the OMB chief, before he moved on to Fannie Mae. where he played the same game.

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 1:38 PM  

wooo lawdy that gave me a smelly picture in my mind!  lol

Anonymous,  November 23, 2009 1:38 PM  

more true than you know

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 1:42 PM  

I"m afraid to read it.  NOthing against Graham but I'd hate for him (in his zeal perhaps) to derail Sarah's chances with Indies B4 they even start!  Too much religion talk will turn her off quickly to them.  I"ve never noticed her being PUSHY with her religion, thankfully.  She's too classy 4 that but others might not be smart enough or maybe they don't care if she runs or not.  hmm I wonder?  IT's a big country with a LOT of opinions on GOD.  I hope Billy remembers that.

TexMex,  November 23, 2009 1:44 PM  

That was fun to watch. Lots of women out there really connecting with Palin. I did enjoy the New Yorker at the end. He zeroed in on Palin's appeal. She gives direct answers. Middle America respects that even if they don't like the answer. She's big and getting bigger. Continnetti (sp?), the author of the Persecution of Sarah Palin, thinks she's going to take a page out of her 2006 Gubernatorial run playbook. I think he's right. It's exciting to watch her.

riley4palin,  November 23, 2009 1:45 PM  

My only question is, why can't Maureen Dowd just be more like Governor Palin?

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 1:46 PM  

I won't argue the reality of the 90's (for me)
They were Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat!  LOTS of jobs!  LOTS of extra cash, NO reason to be KILLING people in other countries in mass.  All was right with my world and everyone I knew at that time.  It was like hitting a brick wall - 2000  POW  (for me at least)

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 1:48 PM  

ROFLOL!!!  hahaha!

lonestar,  November 23, 2009 1:52 PM  

Billy Graham is the only "Preacher" I know of who does not incite the left.  The lefties I talk to see him more as a Wise Old Man, a sort of village elder.

lonestar,  November 23, 2009 1:54 PM  

For me, the really profitable years were during Bush 41.

Anonymous,  November 23, 2009 1:55 PM  

Maybe, but bringing up Bill Clinton would be a very smart move.  First, he and Hillary still have a lot of fans who don't like Obama.  For a Republican and a conservative to praise them, even in small ways, would be a big deal.  It could go a long way.  Even something as small as Palin potentially working out some event or something his Clinton Global Initiative or whatever and helping raise some money would be a brilliant flanking maneuver. 

I know that Greta Van Susteren's husband knows both Clintons well and actually tried to arrange some sort of joint fundraiser to help retire Hillary's debt.  That may be a bridge too far but he knows both of them and I'm sure he could help arrange something involving the Clinton Initiative or something like that.  It would also get her in touch with all of the "Friends of Bill" who are still very active and know a whole bunch of people.  And most of whom don't like Obama and blame him personally for ruining their return to power.  They'd like nothing more than to take him down and get revenge, 

The more people from that circle(DC/Beltway people) who meet her and come away with a good impression the less she's seen as trailer trash from the sticks, the less her and Todd are seen as the 00s equal of Roseanne and Dan Conner from Roseanne or like they just got back from a Jeff Foxworthy show.  Not an accurate impression, but too prevalent I think.  One of the reasons the media derides her so much.  Even with conservatives like Bush/Cheney/McCain they didn't agree with them but they respected them and they saw them as part of the in-crowd.  They saw, and still see her as the living embodiment of a Shania Twain song, not on their level.  That can be a problem.

Even if only 10% of Clinton supporters in a state like IA or NH were to come out for her, that'd be more than enough to swing an yelection.  Depending how she plays it I could see way more than 10%.  And in a general they'd be more than enough to send Obama home.  They would have been in 2008 if the economy hadn't collapsed.  they will be in 2012.

One thing Obama has done is make Reps and conservatives reevaluate the Clintons.  Amazingly, most would gladly take Hillary in the WH over Obama any day now, and no one would have thought that possible even two yrs ago.  I know I have a newfound respect for them.  I might not have agreed with Bill, but I never thought he had no respect for America and a fundamentally different view of the world.

I think that brief section in the book about having coffee with Hillary and some of the nie words about Bill were sort of an opening.

Steven,  November 23, 2009 2:01 PM  

The Clinton angle is interesting, but not urgently needed right now. Let's see how this Hillary/Obama marriage goes, before we look for Palin to exploit anything. I am sure that Hillary having a coffee with Palin would be seen as a political smack to Obama if it ever happens. It would help Palin immensely, but I don't envision this happening unless Obama really crosses Hillary sometime between now and 2012.

Anonymous,  November 23, 2009 2:02 PM  

also, why does she have to insult her kids' names like that?  No point in doing so.  Amazingly, I bet Ms Dowd has never met Sarah or even spoken to her.  I have a feeling that if she were to sit down with her for even 20 minutes and just shoot the breeze she'd find she has way more in common and way more of a connection with her than she'd imagine.  Certainly more than the detached loner Obama.

That was one thing I noticed in the book.  Sarah constantly mentions friends and thanks a bunch of them at the end.  She mentions the Elite 6.  Obama has no friends, no elite anything.  Notice that.  You never hear about anyone he hung out with.  Remember all the "friends of Bil".  There are no "Friends of Barack".  No one he shot hoops with, took the kids over to play with, etc...  Nothing.  That's very strange.  Even going back to his college days you don't really find any stories about "I was friends with Barack" or hear any crazy stories about when in college or just starting out.  Not many remember him from college.  Now, maybe there are a bunch of them and the media just lays off and they all remain private, but I doubt it.  You'd have heard more than you do. 

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 2:02 PM  

yep mine was not bad there as well but I was just off being a soldier and the world was my oyster back then

PEC,  November 23, 2009 2:10 PM  

Agree.  This would be something to bring up if a. the GOP Campaign is sputtering and needs some in the middle (very dangerous).  b. During the General election to reach across the aisle some (quite believable).

JohnDoeAt30Below,  November 23, 2009 2:11 PM  

I still think Hillary is going to run in '12. Never count out the Clintons....

gardunne63,  November 23, 2009 2:18 PM  

I agree. I think Hillary will run in 2012, especially if Obama's approval numbers keep tanking.

conservativemama,  November 23, 2009 2:21 PM  

Lonestar you nailed it.  Dowd at her age has found no one who wants to spend all of their days with her.  No one wants to be there with her at the end.  Essentially that is marriage.  Someone loves you so much that they are committed to the end, to hold your hand as you depart this life one day.

And no children to love.  Unimaginable for me.  And still, with a husband and children, I managed to earn a couple of college degrees and build a career.  Maureen writes, and she has a Pulitzer Prize, but so what.  She peaked during the Clinton year and has only grown more ridiculous and more shrill.  This column should embarrass her, but it won't.

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 2:22 PM  

well I'm not an INDIE so she'll have to win the primary w/OUT me this time.  IF she can manage that................ she might get my vote.

kcarpenter,  November 23, 2009 2:23 PM  

Great article Joshua

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 2:23 PM  

ok well I'm no longer a DEM so if she can manage to beat Obambam in the primaries w/out me this time she MAY get my vote in the BIG election.  Depending on if Sarah is running or not.

yogi41,  November 23, 2009 2:23 PM  

Speaking of media beltway snobs, Kathleen Parker also has an article up about Palin. Hot Air posted it, but it's basically Sarah just needs to count her blessings and stop complaining about the Newsweek cover and other sexist coverage. She's lucky to be getting any attention at all. Yep, that about sums up Parker's wisdom.

ChillinInMN,  November 23, 2009 2:26 PM  

I hate to be a negative nellie, but sometimes I wonder why we should even gives a rat's butt what this twit Dowd thinks. She doesn't like Sarah, she doesn't like conservative ideas - she never will. Obama is her hero, she's invested too much ink in him and his bullcrap ideas of utopia america to be a convert. Forget her.

yogi41,  November 23, 2009 2:26 PM  

I don't, unless Obama doesn't run.

If she dares challenges him again, the Super Delegates will turn from her, the African-Americans will turn from her and the progressive lefty activists, who never even liked her (Kos, Americablog, etc) won't turn out for her. Since the Democratic primaries are so different from ours, the Super Delegates hold a lot of power in who the nominee is, and there is no way they're going to turn away from Obama. He bought a bunch of them off the last time, and he will again.

Hillary won more "normal" delegates than Obama, but he outdid her with the Super Delegates. That's what put him over the top.

However, if Obama chooses not to run for a 2nd term, like Johnson chose not to, I think Hillary does run. The question is, will the Supers back her or Biden?

conservativemama,  November 23, 2009 2:27 PM  

President Obama has all the gravitas of a helium balloon and all of the intellect and complexity of a college freshman.

I am so tired of hearing how intelligent and articulate he is.  To borrow from Jerry Maguire, "SHOW ME THE INTELLIGENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!"

yogi41,  November 23, 2009 2:28 PM  

And don't forget he rode that tech bubble for all it was worth, until it popped.

PEC,  November 23, 2009 2:29 PM  

Saw that.  My advice to KP is just stop writing about Sarah in any form until 2013.  There I said it.

manajordan,  November 23, 2009 2:29 PM  

Sarah Palin is geniune and makes no secret about who she is and what she stand for. I'd love for Obama to keep being more and more geniunely who he is, and placing his full ideology on display so that Americans can understand where he is coming from and what he wants for America. Of course that would depend on a media not bent on making sure he doesn't fail.

Good article Josh.

PEC,  November 23, 2009 2:32 PM  

Hillary may have shot herself in the head.  His weak foreign policy is directly tied to Hillary.  If she says he bypassed her then it will be brought up how many times she endorsed his message.  When you sell your soul to the Devil, the devil owns you.  Sorry Hillary as SOS you have the right and obligation to speak out against the Prez when he is wrong.  She works for the citizens not Obama.

MarkRNY,  November 23, 2009 2:32 PM  

It was also taken pre Billy Graham.

Don't fear Huck. At this point, the only things that can stop Sarah are Sarah or a combination of Huck drawing away enough Evangelical votes to throw the nomination to Pawlenty, or whatever other establishment candidate turns up. Romney's cooked imo.

BUT!--That assumes it'll be a close primary! I think by the time 12 rolls around, The Arctic Fox will run away with it! Every weakness O has-everything people will be (and already are) disgusted/humiliated with him about plays right into her-and only her-hands. So will the MSM anti-Sarah frenzy. They're cooked too.

Poor Maureen. She used to be a fairly good looking woman. Now her bitterness has ruined her looks. I think Sarah might have her looking like Helen Thomas soon. 

Their whole worldview is caving in on them! 

Izzy,  November 23, 2009 2:33 PM  

the African American population would sit home, even vote Palin to tick her off in the general election.  She can not win general election without them.

PatrickinOH,  November 23, 2009 2:33 PM  

I have noticed the same thing, when it comes to his college years you know almost nothing about them, you know where he went to college but it is like when you see top secret documents and over 90% of the info is just blacked out, he also won't release his college grades which leads me to believe that he is probably not as smart as the media makes him out to be, I think he is smart in a different way, he is smart at manipulation and hiding who he really is

Izzy,  November 23, 2009 2:34 PM  

Remember Clinton is for most of Obama's policy. 

Recovering Democrat,  November 23, 2009 2:37 PM  

Wow, how awesome to see Sapwolf. His interview was FANTASTIC. He gave an awesome shout-out to C4P, with the shirt, as well as a nice plug for Joseph Russo and all the intelligent commentary here on this site.

Something big is in the air. It's just amazing!

Recovering Democrat,  November 23, 2009 2:38 PM  

Graham is totally mainstream in most people's minds. He's not in the cateogory of a Pat Robertson. And even so, McDonnell won despite his close ties.

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 2:39 PM  

my feeling on Hillary (she's pro girl power)
but she is also a bit of a masochiist
forgiving Bill was one thing
putting up with the years of Hillary bashing first from the right then from her own party
and NOW the continued insult of having a punk no nothing in charge when it should have been HER!!  yep she caved imo.  SARAH would have stepped up more forcefully I believe.  but I'm not in the bubble so who knows.

TexMex,  November 23, 2009 2:40 PM  

I don't know about that. I can only imagine the furor that would cause w/in the Dem Party if she, as a member of his Admin, challenged him for the nomination. I recall Reagan did that to Ford, and didn't Ted Kennedy attempt to do that to...Carter? Clearly, it's happened before, but it would bring down the full fury of the Party against her. I don't know if she wants to go through that. What would be interesting is if Palin, let's say, gets elected and appoints Mrs. Clinton as her Nat'l Sec Advisor or keeps her as SoS. I wouldn't put it past Palin. She's known to put good people in positions regardless of politics.

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 2:42 PM  

the SUPERS turned out to be well planned and put in place PUNKS 4 OBAMA
and you are right the black caucus will rally against her (especially with Tubbs Jones long since gone, may she rest in peace) the whole party needs to be shaken loose.  Much like the Reps have hopefully learned a few lessons since BUSH (I pray).  We need COMMON SENSE individuals to STEP UP.  ONes that can prove themselves with their records NOT sealed!!

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 2:48 PM  

true!  wouldn't you have?  ride baby ride! lol

ladydawnelle,  November 23, 2009 2:50 PM  

lol if he said it like he meant it
aka if his college papers were released

He'd be kicked to the curb by the masses!  AND half of his entourage!

PatrickinOH,  November 23, 2009 2:53 PM  

I find it curious that he won't release his college grades

PatrickinOH,  November 23, 2009 3:02 PM  

me and RAM are now friends on facebook and on her wall her and Rachel D'Oro are talking to each other am I missing something?

Dan C,  November 23, 2009 3:05 PM  

In Iowa it will be about retail politics, meeting and greeting and what people think of you UP CLOSE. These polls show she is in the game but she will blow them open when she gets there in 2012 and is meeting with voters. The early states are all like that. They want you to come there and speak to them.

Dan C,  November 23, 2009 3:07 PM  

Exavtly, Grham is one of the greatest humanitarians in America.

A,  November 23, 2009 3:27 PM  

Couric's gin dance. Perky, but insecure?

http://gawker.com/5410874/katie-courics-forbidden-dance-of-gin/gallery/?skyline=true&s=i

narciso,  November 23, 2009 3:32 PM  

I wasn't going to link that, but isn't that kind of like a drunken Elaine on Seinfeld. I thought blackmail worked the other way

Bestbud,  November 23, 2009 3:36 PM  

Maureen Doud is... as Sarah says... backassword!...

Saying, "Palin can be stupefyingly simplistic" and Obama is "impressively complex but seems static."

MAUREEN!...DEAR!,  It's... Palin is impressively complex and gloriously dynamic!...

 Obama is stupefyingly hollow and statue-se cold.

PEC,  November 23, 2009 3:40 PM  

Not too worried at least not yet.  Timing says there is nothing to worry about.  Hint page 413 in the book, when the book was written and when RAM stopped posting.  Soemtimes you have to deal with the devils in this game.  Don't sell your soul to them but deal with them.

Recovering Democrat,  November 23, 2009 3:57 PM  

My first thought was photoshop. I doubt Katie was doing that kind of dance. You can kind of tell in that first picture that the woman is a little larger built than the Perky One.

toughluck,  November 23, 2009 4:24 PM  

There were some rumors early this year that Hillary was going to resign at the end of this year. I thought that would be the only way to save herself politically, given the increasingly diminishing amount of power she yields in the current administration, as Obama is continiously undercutting her by naming 'czars' for subsections of the foreing policy (iraq czar, Iran czar, etc) of which she is supposed to have overall control. I think if Hillary has any ambitions for 2012, resigning withing a year form now would be the only way to save it. Bu I hope she is stays on and sinks with the Obama ship :).

Besides I think Obama is narcissist enough and arrogant enough that he will run for a second term, in which case it would be difficult for Hillary to run.

toughluck,  November 23, 2009 4:33 PM  

I dont think the grades are the issue, I think what he is trying to protect is the information he provided to obtain finanacial aid (such as his name). My understanding is that he did not start using the name Barack until a few years into college when a girlfriend told him she liked that name. I believe he was using the name Barry before that. Another embarrassment would be reference to prior educational records (pre-school? high school?) under the name Barry Soetoro, which he used early in his life. Other embarrassment would be the organizations providing him educational grants. I read somewhere that he had a middle eastern benefactor (dont remember his name) that may have contributed to his educational expenses. Plus the records might indicate dual citizen status in his college years.

So I think thats why he has paid so much money to his lawyers to get the educational records (which seem pretty inocuous a first sight) from being released.

eclecticak,  November 23, 2009 4:58 PM  

Wow, this is BIG! Ol' Rev. B.G. pretty much came flat out and gave her his blessing/endorsement. The only people who this will turn off are atheists and various religious fanatics. To a pan-theistic pagan like me this approval by a Spiritual Leader of such stature and respect is a GOOD thing....

PatrickinOH,  November 23, 2009 4:59 PM  

I did hear that he used to be called Barry, I had been hearing him refered to Bary Soetoro but I never understood where it came from, and I did hear that someone who may been a terrorist in the middle east did pay for part of his education

PatrickinOH,  November 23, 2009 5:08 PM  

Oh no I am not worried RAM might go benedict arnold on Sarah, it is just a weird pairing I guess it is a case of keep your friends close and your enemies closer

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP