Saturday, November 14, 2009

Newsweek Tries to Be Clever, Fails



Newsweek attempted to be clever in a cover story on Sarah Palin (no link to their drivel). Alas, they failed.

From David Kopel:

The cover of next week’s Newsweek features a picture of Sarah Palin, along with the headline “How do you solve a problem like Sarah?” The cover is one more example of the periodical’s positioning itself as the ideas journal for people who think that the New York Times’ in-house editorials are middle-of-road, but have too many big words. And of the magazine’s cultural disconnect from much of the United States.

To wit: “How do you solve a problem like Maria?” is an early song in The Sound of Music, which won the 1965 Academy Award for Best Picture.

[...]

[T]he question “How do you solve a problem like Sarah?’ provides its own answer, at least to people who know the film from which the song comes: Make her the President of the United States.

I’m not arguing for or against Palin for President–just observing that, as is so often the case, the Palin-hating media are less clever than they think, and end up inadvertently making her stronger.

From AoSHQ (strong language warning):

Dear Newsweek,

Maria was the hero of that musical. And she proved the s****** who called her a "problem" way, way wrong.

From Allahpundit at Hot Air:

[W]hat is there to say? The mainstream leftist take on Palin should be familiar to the point of utter banality by now... Andy Levy calls the two articles some of the laziest political writing he’s ever read...

If that’s not enough Newsweek for you, enjoy senior editor Michael Hirsh wringing his hands this morning on CBS over Palin’s “disturbing” vindictiveness. This comes on the same day, mind you, that news is breaking about how Anita Dunn’s fantastically petty attack on Fox News did indeed come from the top, likely ordered by a guy who’s been known to act out the fantasy deaths of his political enemies with a steak knife.

And from NewsBusters:

Mike Allen of Politico previewed the cover in the Nov. 14 edition of his "Playbook." In it, he included these comments from Newsweek editor John Meacham who blamed Palin for Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., struggles with his conservative base in South Carolina. One of those struggles for Graham was his acknowledgment that climate change is a manmade phenomenon in need of a so-called "compromise," And that backlash is somehow former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's fault.

I seem to recall another attempt by Newsweek to be clever: Intentionally shrinking its already plummeting readership. Good luck with that, Newsweek.

84 comments:

Bill in Baltimore,  November 14, 2009 10:36 PM  

first !<span> </span>

Enrigen,  November 14, 2009 10:42 PM  

What is this "Newsweek" that you speak of?

Andrew,  November 14, 2009 10:45 PM  

Being biased and hateful is hard work, give us abreak!

/Newsweek, MSM, etc

GAHanson,  November 14, 2009 10:46 PM  

You can see the NEWSWEAK cover here:  http://www.theadmonition.com/?p=2035&cpage=1

My take is that #1, NEWSWEAK sales will skyrocket for that issue, #2 Most people dislike both parties, and will actually like it that she is trouble to both of them, #3 epic fail. 

When Runners World featured Gov. Palin it sold 7 times as many newsstand issues than normal.  When TIME had her on the cover a few months ago, most stores imposed a limit of 2 copies per customer.

NEWSWEAKS main purpose is to increase their sagging, lagging and dragging sales.

Nancy,  November 14, 2009 10:46 PM  

Newsweek loosely translated: Bathroom Reading

Bill in Baltimore,  November 14, 2009 10:50 PM  

It really is funny to watch them trip all over themselves and make them look like fools.

Seriously, think of a bunch of old white guys yakking away telling you Sarah is a boob, oops, a dunce, but off to their right is Sarah, smiling, waving, winking at Todd, holding Trig, Piper on the cell phone . . . 
- now who ya gonna follow ?????<span> </span>

Bill in Baltimore,  November 14, 2009 10:51 PM  

Someone commented earlier about Rush's picture of the "jury of peers", it really is hilarious.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html

yogi41,  November 14, 2009 10:51 PM  

LOL! Charles, or as Sarah calls him "Charlie", will never live that down.

Nancy,  November 14, 2009 10:54 PM  

How do you solve a problem like Sarah?
Give her more coverage of course!
And.....write hateful articles about her, written by out of touch, beltway elites!

It's Foolproof!

Tommy Report,  November 14, 2009 10:55 PM  

Media Matters seems to believe that the "Dick" thanked in the alleged acknowledgements section to Going Rogue is Dick Morris.

Whitney,  November 14, 2009 10:56 PM  

I just finished a LOTUS post on then Newsweak story if anyone is interested:
http://bit.ly/22Zsnp

GAHanson,  November 14, 2009 11:01 PM  

Interesting take on Gov. Palin from a democrat.  I've noticed a shift on several dem blogs lately, they're starting to get really worried.  Let's face it, as that one story said Gov. Palin has been mentioned in over 13,000 stories, just in the last month, compared to 8,000 for Biden.  Amazon now offers 35 books about Gov. Palin, along with hundreds of other items including news articles, magazines, etc., that you can buy from them, about 13 pages worth of stuff.  Cafepress offers 750,000 products with over 20,000 designs featuring Gov. Palin.  People squeeze her name into stories that are totally unrelated to her just to attract hits.  All that has got to tell us something.  Now, HarperCollins ordering a 2nd press run, because 1.5 million wasn't enough.

GAHanson,  November 14, 2009 11:02 PM  

<span>Interesting take on Gov. Palin from a democrat.  </span>
<span></span><span></span>
<span>http://www.bloggernews.net/122985</span>
<span></span>
<span>I've noticed a shift on several dem blogs lately, they're starting to get really worried.  Let's face it, as that one story said Gov. Palin has been mentioned in over 13,000 stories, just in the last month, compared to 8,000 for Biden.  Amazon now offers 35 books about Gov. Palin, along with hundreds of other items including news articles, magazines, etc., that you can buy from them, about 13 pages worth of stuff.  Cafepress offers 750,000 products with over 20,000 designs featuring Gov. Palin.  People squeeze her name into stories that are totally unrelated to her just to attract hits.  All that has got to tell us something.  Now, HarperCollins ordering a 2nd press run, because 1.5 million wasn't enough.</span>

Bill in Baltimore,  November 14, 2009 11:08 PM  

Greatest economic stimulus evah: Sarah Palin unleashed.

eclecticak,  November 14, 2009 11:09 PM  

They cropped the LOTUS on the table from that picture!

RedDaveR,  November 14, 2009 11:09 PM  

It's funny to see Newsweek giving the GOP advice. Problem is that there are still too many in the GOP who take their advice.

Rush is right:  People like Newsweek and CBS are telling us who our candidate in 2012 should be by who they're attacking.

JeanA,  November 14, 2009 11:09 PM  

I am going to go to the stores and write on magazines:  Make her the President

Hope I don't get caught.

JeanA,  November 14, 2009 11:10 PM  

<span>I am going to go to the stores and write on the front cover:  Make her the President 
 
Hope I don't get caught.</span>

Whitney,  November 14, 2009 11:10 PM  

I posted this in an earlier thread, but this isn't the first time that Newsweak has had a ridiculous and juvenile covers story regarding Gov. Palin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlKcCg9vAoY&feature=player_embedded

defendAmerica,  November 14, 2009 11:10 PM  

Repost of our guesses from last night.

<span>List of people that Sarah acknowledges in her book by first name only... help guess the last names...      
     
<span><span>With help from Whitney and Yogi41 and Tommy Report and Cruela and Recovering Democrat and onexsturtle and jimr3...</span>          
         
<span><span><span><span>Amanda Carpenter                       
Andrew  Brietbart                       
Ann Coulter                       
Bill(s) O'Reilly and Bill Kristol                    
<span>Bob Lester from Bob and Mark                     
<span>Cal  Thomas </span>                     
<span>Dennis Miller </span></span>                      
<span>Dick Cheney or Dick Armey or Dick Morris </span>              
Eddie Burke                       
<span>Fred Malek or Fred Barnes </span>               
Glenn  Beck                       
Greta VanSustern                       
<span>Hugh Hewitt?                      
<span>Joey Russo</span></span>                  
<span>John Coale or John Ziegler   </span>                  
<span>Jonah  Goldberg?                      
<span>Larry Kudlow</span></span>                    
Laura Ingraham                       
<span>Lou Dobbs</span>                       
<span>Mark Levin or Mark Steyn or Mark from Bob and Mark</span>                     
<span>Mary Matalin or Mary Katherine Hamm   </span></span></span></span>                
<span><span><span><span>Michael Reagan or Michael Medlev </span>                     
Michelle Malkin<span>  </span>                    
R.A.M. (Rebecca A Mansour!!!!)                       
<span><span>Rich Lowery</span></span><span> or Rich Crowther (!!!) </span>                
Rush Limbaugh                       
S.E. Cupp                       
Sean Hannity                       
Tammy Bruce                       
<span>Walter Williams?</span></span></span></span></span></span></span>

Zephyr,  November 14, 2009 11:10 PM  

Bathroom wiping!

Mia,  November 14, 2009 11:10 PM  

Newsweek....Poof..!!

defendAmerica,  November 14, 2009 11:13 PM  

it was too scary for the newsweek crowd!

gardunne63,  November 14, 2009 11:18 PM  

I'm really surprised Jon Meachum is able to breathe since his mouth is always so firmly wrapped around Obama's _____!  Those nose breathers....

Whitney,  November 14, 2009 11:19 PM  

If Sarah is so dumb and incompetent, shouldn't they have "solved" her already?

Whitney,  November 14, 2009 11:24 PM  

By the way, this "clever" analogy is about as clever as when President Obama tried to use the Post Office vs.UPS and FedEx to support the public option.

Mia,  November 14, 2009 11:24 PM  

Lindsey...struggles with his conservative base....YIKES!!!...
Calling Beehive????

Whitney,  November 14, 2009 11:25 PM  

Lindsey's following in the footsteps of the husband.

Mia,  November 14, 2009 11:27 PM  

Whit....Your sooooooooo...in Trouble!

Ted Torgerson,  November 14, 2009 11:32 PM  

Julie Andrews in The Sound of Music. That's not a bad comparison for Sarah. Levi is that Hitler Youth Rolf that sells out the family. Obama is the Fuhrer.

Nancy,  November 14, 2009 11:32 PM  

Newt is looking at that list, like a 7th grade boy looks at the list to see if he made the cut for the junior high basketball team.
His finger going down the page next to each name: nope, no, ooooohhh!, nope, nope and nope. Walks away dejectedly.

Lakerfanalways,  November 14, 2009 11:33 PM  

Mia I LOVE your avatar. Stewie ROCKS!! And what the hell is a Newsweek, never heard of them

an lifelong democrat-soon-2-B-independent,  November 14, 2009 11:34 PM  

um, yea, ya know america-loving democrats like me are abandoning the UN-democratic party.  They have gone completely radical and marxist.  Oh, and media people, I'm a pro-choice supporter of Sarah Palin's.  I'm more interested and supportive of  her fiscal/national security and energy policies.

Beehive,  November 14, 2009 11:35 PM  

What! Just one day.

All I want is one day without well...you know what.

Dan C,  November 14, 2009 11:37 PM  

I saw this comment on newsbusters.A quick personal story about Sarah Palin

<span>November 14, 2009 - 13:30 ET by Patrick Michael</span>
Let me tell everyone a quick story about Sarah Palin.  I have a VA Nurse Practitioner named Kelly who has been a complete guardian angel to me and my family.  I have had 3 heart attacks in the last two years and never would have made it without Kelly's stellar care.  I can't explain in this brief post all that she did for me, but suffice it to say that she was (and is) wonderful.  In the course of our many conversations I found out that she shared my conservative views and was a BIG Sarah Palin fan.  I wanted to show Kelly how much she meant to me, so I wrote Sarah Palin a brief note asking if she could send Kelly a quick note thanking her for taking such good care of our veterans.  Now keep in mind that I was in Michigan and Sarah was running the State of Alaska and there was NOTHING in this for her.  Two days after writing Sarah I was watching the news when she resigned from the Governor's office, I was extremely sad and somewhere in the back of my mind I thought - well, no letter for Kelly then.  Imagine my surprise when Sarah Palin with all that she had going on at the time took time out to write Kelly a very nice handwritten personal thank you which Kelly treasures.  So say what you want about the woman, I think she is a class act.
Stay Free!!!

Nancy,  November 14, 2009 11:37 PM  

Newsweek is the magazine you push aside, unless it has Sarah Palin on the cover.
The Accelerant.

Mia,  November 14, 2009 11:38 PM  

<<<<<..Laker...This is Newsweek's editor...

Nancy,  November 14, 2009 11:39 PM  

Governor Palin makes me veklempt.

Nancy,  November 14, 2009 11:42 PM  

Governor Palin makes me verklempt.

TangledThorns,  November 14, 2009 11:52 PM  

Newseek is just trying to cash in and trash on Sarah Palin at the same time.

Mia,  November 14, 2009 11:54 PM  

Plummeting Readership....pity...

TexMex,  November 15, 2009 12:12 AM  

<span>Per NYTimes' Review of 'Going Rogue'</span>
<span> </span>
<span>“Yet, Mr. McCain’s astonishing decision to pick someone with so little experience (less than two years as the governor of Alaska, and before that, two terms as mayor of Wasilla, a town with fewer than 7,000 residents) as his running mate and Ms. Palin’s own surprisingly nonchalant reaction to Mr. McCain’s initial phone call about the vice president’s slot (she writes that it felt “like a natural progression”) underscore just how alarmingly expertise is discounted — or </span><span><span><span>e</span>quated with elitism</span><span> — in our increasingly democratized era, and just how thoroughly colorful personal narratives overshadow policy arguments and actual knowledge.”</span></span>
<span> </span>
<span>*snorfle* Wait, is this about about Obama, or Palin? I'm so confused because every criticism they level at Palin actually applies ten fold to Obama. </span>
<span> </span>
<span>Is this Mad Libs for book reviews? </span>
<span> </span>
<span>“Yet, </span><span>Democrats'</span><span> astonishing decision to pick someone with so little experience (less than two years as </span><span>a</span><span> </span><span>U.S. Senator</span><span>, and before that, </span><span>one</span><span> terms as </span><span>State Senator...</span><span>) as </span><span>its candidate</span><span> and </span><span>Mr. Obama's</span><span> own surprisingly nonchalant reaction to </span><span>being nominated</span><span> slot (</span><span>he</span><span> writes that it felt “like a natural progression”) underscore just how alarmingly expertise is discounted — or </span><span><span><span>e</span>quated with elitism</span><span> — in our increasingly democratized era, and just how thoroughly colorful personal narratives overshadow policy arguments and actual knowledge.”</span></span>
<span> </span>
<span>You know, there comes a point when shoving that round peg in that square hole will make the peg break. </span>

TexMex,  November 15, 2009 12:14 AM  

<span>Tedious, isn’t it? I seem to have the same conversation every day with people: </span>
<span>She's inexperienced, you say? Actually, isn't Obama? <span>Well, he went to Harvard</span>. Oh, where in the Constitution does it state a President must be Ivy League educated to qualify for the Presidency? <span>It doesn't, but common sense prefers an educated person over a non-educated person</span>. Palin is educated. <span>Pff...at Idaho State</span>. A fine public school and past experience shows that some of our best Presidents either did not attend prestigious schools i.e. Reagan,  or were self educated i.e. Washington, Lincoln, Truman. Some of our most well educated Presidents, i.e. Adams, Wilson, George H.W. Bush performed terribly in the job. Considering the current President's behavior, you know it's not too long before I add his name right behind Bush Sr. Your definition of "intelligence" is narrow when applied to the Office of the Presidency. It's about being presented with one terrible option and one awful option and figuring which one is the best. It's about making a hard and unpopular decision and having the conviction to hold fast to it because it's the right decision for the country. And it's about finding a spot on the horizon to go to and leading the people there even when all others tell you it can't be done. </span>
<span> </span>
<span>"Intelligence" needs to be more than "book smart" bc if it wasn't, John Adams would've been the greatest President we've ever had. He wasn't. A brilliant man no doubt and without whom we never would've made it through the Revolution and early life of this country, but he was valuable as a political theorist and advocate of the American cause. As President he was tone deaf to public sentiment and made very poor policy decisions: Alien and Sedition Acts. Lincoln learned the law on his own and cultivated his philosophy and politics giving stump speeches throughout the Midwest and sparring in debates. Reagan went to Eureka College and cut his political teeth on the lecture circuit and radio programs. Obama has done no such thing. He never stayed in one job long enough to keep the seat warm. Palin, should she choose to run for the Presidency, will have the chance to follow Lincoln and Reagan's playbook all while giving it a 21st century spin: Behold FB and Twitter. She's going to speak in front of community colleges and chamber of commerce centers. She's going to turn out Op-eds from the WSJ to NRO. She's going to stump for candidates. By the time 2011 rolls around not one person will be able to credibly state that he doesn't know where she stands on an issue. What Palin has experienced, what she is experiencing will be just the amount of experience I'm looking for in someone who is tasked with steering this ship of state. To carry this theme one step further: It's all well and good for Obama to know how to read maps, but if he doesn't have the smarts to know that little ice cube floating in the water up ahead is actually a giant iceberg then he's not only useless to us but damn near dangerous. Get me a captain who knows the danger and takes a better route.  </span>
<span> </span>
<span>Dudes...I think I just rivaled Techno for lengthy post ;) </span>

PEC,  November 15, 2009 12:17 AM  

SarahPac donated money to Lyndsey Graham.  Where is AP factchecking the Newsweek article?  I think Sarah sees that Graham along with McCain and Lieberman are strong on National Defense which is priority numero uno for Sarah. 

Ernst,  November 15, 2009 12:19 AM  

Honestly, i'm surprised that people even read newsweek or time . Does it have a circulation worth mentioning.  Back in the 80's  i read all the mags and felt semi-informed.  Now I don;t read any mags and i'm very informed.  Praise God for the internet and all those who must work so hard exposing this info.

Beehive,  November 15, 2009 12:21 AM  

If you do blame it on Bush.

JohnDoeAt30Below,  November 15, 2009 12:23 AM  

Possibly Walter Hickel......He opened a lot of doors for her when she ran for Governor. Yeah, I know he's said some pretty harsh things of late about her but that doesn't mean she isn't grateful.

PEC,  November 15, 2009 12:26 AM  

OT - The Palingates web page had scanned pages from Sarah's book.  I checked a couple of books and that breaks copyright violation.  If anybody knows how to get screeenshots this needs to be sent to Sarah and Harper Collins immediately.  I can't find this site right now.  I know it has ties with Celtic Diva.  Remember all sites are registered to somebody so they are responsible.  If anybody can find this Please do the screenshots.

PEC,  November 15, 2009 12:30 AM  

Obama doesn't exactly know too much about Mid-East.  The guy ran on the Afghan strategy and 10 months into time as COmmander in Chief he still doesnt know enough to develop a strategy.  And I am somebody that has served under 5 COmmander un Chiefs and this guy is the Worse.  Not a close 2nd to how bad he has been.

narciso,  November 15, 2009 12:34 AM  

BTW, it looks like Copenhagen has gone the way of the Norwegian blue parrot:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/11/14/breaking-world-leaders-agree-delay-global-warming-deal

PEC,  November 15, 2009 12:36 AM  

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_XckT2h8g80s/Sv6UU3FScKI/AAAAAAAAAJQ/5ifiDpV3Ifg/s1600-h/Going+Rogue+page+55.jpg

Please please.  Somebody that knows how to do screenshots get these
http://palingates.blogspot.com/

This is one of the Alaskan Crew.  It is odd that somebody breaking copyright laws try to criticeze somebody else.

PEC,  November 15, 2009 12:41 AM  

Hot Hot Hot Celtic Diva did the same
http://divasblueoasis.com/

Folks by a couple of books I have looked at this is copyright violation.
Please somebody that can do screenshots get this to Sarah and Harper Collins ASAP.

JeanA,  November 15, 2009 12:47 AM  

<p><span>HarperCollins
Phone: 212-207-7000
http://www.harpercollins.com/</span></p>

A,  November 15, 2009 1:02 AM  

Quiz. Which word in more common on the internet?

1. Palin

or 

2. The

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:05 AM  

Thanks JeanA.  I just fear they will catch this and remove it from their sites.  With a screenshot from their sites they could remove but the damage is done.  Writing in their own words is one thing but I don't think it is legal to put pages on-line.  I just don't have the computer skills to do screenshots.  I have let Harper COllins know.

Patty Hewes,  November 15, 2009 1:10 AM  

While viewing the "blog" press the print screen key on your keyboard, Then open paint and paste it

Tommy Report,  November 15, 2009 1:17 AM  

Erickson claims that he has an interview with Palin:

http://twitter.com/ewerickson/status/5685771161

narciso,  November 15, 2009 1:20 AM  

Yes, PEC, he made a big deal of carrying Steve Coll's Ghost Wars around, yet the lesson of that book was not to abandon Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Taliban, something he seems to have forgotten. That book is most certainly in her unequivocal, unvarnished voice, I did have a little amusement at Celtic's disgruntlement that the ethics snipehunt doesn't form a large part of at least one book

Sapwolf,  November 15, 2009 1:20 AM  

I have been thinking of something like this off and on for months.  I don't know that a Chief of Staff would handle this in DC.  It also is not a media relations person either or press secretary.  Presidents need people to hover around the POTUS like destroyers and escorts in a carrier battlegroup.

It is not only the skills of political radar and fixing those minor things that can blow up, but they must be loyal.  That combo can be tough to find.

Policy, media, politics, these roles are all important in a team.  It is those weaknesses that caused Obama to botch the gifts to the UK and other gaffes that normally would not happen.

Sarah is going to have to delegate more when in DC and it will be very tough given the terrible treatment she has received with the McCain campaign.

She needs the Joey's and RAM's of the world but in roles other than the internet too.

She needs to continue building her organization like she has been doing with loyal people, but also with people who like Bitney have those skills in a DC way, recognizing danger and immediately taking action to dissipate it.

This will be extremely important in DC if she wins in 2012 because the MSM will NEVER give her a break, NEVER.

A,  November 15, 2009 1:25 AM  

Yes, it sounds like clear copyright violation.

Will Sarah want to sue those people?   Maybe.  Let her know. She should have that tool if she wants to use it.

(No, I haven't looked at that website, and won't.)

You might be able to create a pdf of it. Easy on a Mac by selecting print... then pdf.

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:28 AM  

I tried but to no avail.  If we can get to Harper Collins they will likely contact the sites if it is illegal.  As I said not a copyright attorney but the front of the books I have all say this is a no no.

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:30 AM  

I checked his tweets.  I guess this makes the people going after Sarah like Obama is the Nazis.

ChillinInMN,  November 15, 2009 1:36 AM  

Get 'em PEC!!!

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:46 AM  

ANy MAC people.
I think Harper Collins not Sarah has the copyrights for this. 
SOunds like it is easy on MAC.  Any MAC people out there.

JeanA,  November 15, 2009 1:47 AM  

I got some of the images and put them in a word file.

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:48 AM  

Without Screenshot I fear they will get tipped and delte from their sites.  Somebody asks if Sarah would sue.  To have these twerps found guilty of Copyright violation forget the money would Sarah love that?  You BEtcha.

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:52 AM  

HE still reminds me of the boss on Planes Trains and Automobiles that can't make his mind up.  At the end of the movie he is still trying.  Natural smart Commanders in Chief throughout History could evaluate the Battlefield and make decisions.  Even when their actions were off base they could adapt due to their natural talents and make the changes as needed.  Let us get one thing straight.  This is NOT Obama.  HE is making Bill Clinton look like a Julius Caesar as Commander in Chief.  

JohnDoeAt30Below,  November 15, 2009 1:53 AM  

Here's an interesting take from a liberal writer at HuffPo:

I realize I'm the only progressive who believes Sarah Palin is not done on the national scene, and that there is a lot of time for her to reinvent herself. She's going to need it, but she's getting a lot of help in an atmosphere that's a great stage for someone like her.
On the right, Joe Scarborough has pronounced her unelectable nationally, quarantined to getting 25% and that's all.

This analysis is not only wrong, but belies the appetite the American people have for comebacks, at least where men are concerned.

It also ignores two things many Democrats are dismissing, to our detriment. That there isn't a politician on the right who comes close to her charisma, crowd drawing power and ability to reach into people's hearts. And that the American people don't vote on intellectual prowess. They vote on emotion, which Sarah sure knows how to tap. That alone should make Democrats take notice. No doubt it has Romney and Pawlenty stewing.

Still some aren't buying it. But they don't understand how this works.

The Republican strategy Sarah is using has been around since Rush started wailing on radio. It amounts to turning on the emotional engine, which ends up fueling Republican surges. It's the best GOTV, throw the bums out tool the right has, because people like Sarah Palin not only know how to turn it on, but she's actually capable of delivering the message and hooking into people's hearts. As with all issues that hit people personally, non fact based motivation works for getting out the vote against us, as we saw with Palin's "death panels" squeal tour, but can also crystallize what they are for, as was the case in NY-23 where tea party activists and what they believed fueled the rise of a talentless spokesperson simply because he spoke their language, who almost took everyone down and now is wishing he hadn't conceded because the vote totals are getting that close.

Stranger things than a Sarah Palin comeback have happened. George W. Bush beat Democrats twice, the second time based on emotion that keyed in on the bigotry of people thinking America was changing just a little too much, with anti gay marriage amendments the tool. Are people really going to argue that Bush is smarter than Sarah?

And don't underestimate the bailout blues people are experiencing across this country, regardless of party affiliations, topped off by the Democrats seemingly aligning themselves with Wall Street. The populist anger exhibited through the classic brawl of Wall Street versus main street, something Sarah Palin knows how to tap into, is very dangerous for Democrats.

But whether Sarah runs for national office or not, you can bet there will be a huge audience for her interview with Oprah, as her makeover begins. At the very least, she's getting revenge and doing so by traveling battleground states one by one hawking her bestselling book.
People love to hate Sarah, just like they did Hillary. But strong, resilient, determined women can survive anything and live to rise again

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/taylor-marsh/first-hillary-now-sarah_b_357925.html

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:55 AM  

The NY Times review is horrific.  What people want to know is whether to buy the book.  I guess it is solid  on Tax Code and Energy Independence (anything other than it sucks on this means it was top notch).  I still say they can't use Obama because he is 10 months into a presidency and still has no strategy in Afghanistan and not even Iraq.  The Iraq Strategy is the one that Bush had already implemented.

JeanA,  November 15, 2009 1:57 AM  

I put some of the screen shots in a word file.

Patty Hewes,  November 15, 2009 1:58 AM  

These folks would have to deal with <span> Harper Collins not her. </span>

PEC,  November 15, 2009 1:59 AM  

Thanks JeanA.  Do we have a Copyright lawyer on here?

gelston the knowitall,  November 15, 2009 2:27 AM  

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/15/michele-bachmann-president-sarah-palin

A view of American Female conservatives from the london nespaper.

Anonymous,  November 15, 2009 3:14 AM  

Good article.  Every honest democrat knows in their heart one fact.  Obama won the election because the economy collapsed and the market imploded.  Would he have won if the economy stayed as it was throughout the summer and Labor Day?  Maybe.  But he won the election because of the financial collapse and market crash.  Even Axelrod and Plouffe know this.

As for her getting 25%?  Please.  No one gets 25%.  Even Carter got 41%.  Hoover got 40%.  McGovern got 39%.

McCain/Palin got 46% when the incumbent GOP President had an approval rating at 25 before the election, an 80% increase over his rating.  If you go back through history, no ticket ever polled more than 10% or so above the approval rating of their incumbent President on Election Day.  McCain/Palin polled 80% higher than Bush's approval.  And that was despite the economic collapse.  They likely would have doubled it if the economy stayed the same.  Amazing.

Obama is not some unstoppable force.  His % of the 2 party vote in 2008, despite it being the best dem scenario ever, WAS LESS than Bill Clinton's % of the 2 party vote in 1996 an 1992  It was less than Hillary would have won if she had been the nominee..  Less than Bush 41 got in 88.  Less than Reagan got in 84 or 80.  Less than Nixon in 72, Johnson in 64, Eisenhower in 56 or 52.   

It wasn't a landslide by any means.  He won states like OH, FL, IN, NC with 51% of the vote or fewer and is already below 50% apprival in all 4 of them.  They were all special cases where he massively outspent the GOP and in 3 of the 4 states campaigned heavily in a primary months before the election that  greatly skewed what the normal outcome would have been.  McCain won 22 states and came within 1% in 2 others.  It's not like Obama won 49 states.  For perspective, in 3 elections from 1980-1988 the Democratic Party won a total of 17 states.   That's 17 over 3 elections.

Unemployment is at 10.2 and rising.  The deficit is at an all time record.  Spending is insane.  RCP has a great article about how Obama is tearing the Clinton 90s coalition assunder and how the results in VA last week show how this is happening.  We're already seeing independents get fed up and switch back, just like they got fed up with the GOP and switched to the dems.

RCP also had a good article about how the GOP still won white women in 2008 and how Obama actually did worse among them than Gore did, and only slightly better than Kerry.  The GOP won white women by the same margin Obama won overall by.  And that was with everything he had going for him.  Imagine a woman actually with a chance to become President.  Worth at least 3 pts, on top of any other factors in play. 

There won't be any conservatives who buy the Obama myth like some did in 2008.  All the moderates will have seen through him as well.  There won't be someone at the top of the GOP ticket who made his career by antagonizing conservatives and reveling in the attention he got from the media for doing so.  Who at one time or another had deliberately provoked about every major conservative constituency.

We're all still too close to the action, but 50 years from now when historians look back at 2008 they'll all know it was a unique case where an unprecedented economic collapse 6 weeks before the election decided the outcome.  Nothing more complicated than that.  As has been reported before, Steve Schmidt told McCain on 9/15 that the race was over and he had no chance.  Everyone knew it.

I suspect that without that immediate crisis and sense of utter despair and panic people felt as the market was losing 500 pts a day and company after company was going under and the media was trumpeting the next depression, the red states that [...]

Anonymous,  November 15, 2009 3:20 AM  

With all due respect, I don't exactly think Sarah is really aiming for the readership of the NYT.  It's not like she's saying "Well, bad review from the Times, there goes everything".

If anything, the mere fact that someone on staff at the Times actually had to read her book was satisfaction enough for her.

The Times didn't even bother to review Liberty and Tyranny, Culture of Corruptiopn, or any of Glenn Beck's books, and they've all done great.

The NYT should worry more about their slidng stock price and the hundreds of staffers they're about to lay off.  Maybe Obama will hire them.

Bill in Baltimore,  November 15, 2009 7:53 AM  

just put a yellow sticky on the mag cover. They'll think it's real, like you get on newspapers.

Bill in Baltimore,  November 15, 2009 7:56 AM  

>><span>colorful personal narratives overshadow policy arguments and actual knowledge.</span>

um, can you say Sotomayer ?

Bill in Baltimore,  November 15, 2009 8:03 AM  

My conspiracy theory: the economic collapse was orchestrated and timed.

All the pieces for the collapse had been in place for many, many months.

What a "coincidence" it occurred six weeks, everyone started saying "the sky is falling", and Bush bought the lie.

I will never be convinced this was not orchestrated.

defendAmerica,  November 15, 2009 10:28 AM  

Did we really expect a good review from the times?

RINO-Hunter,  November 15, 2009 2:48 PM  

It's just pinin' for the fjords, ya know.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP