Monday, December 14, 2009

Bernie Quigley: Palin and Perry Speak to the Public



Bernie Quigley at The Hill has an interesting piece today about the direction of the Republican Party in the age of Obama. First he discusses the tendency of Obama to care more about being loved by European socialists than looking out for the interests of his own country:

I think it is fair to say that President Barack Obama loves Norway more than he does Kentucky, loves France more than Georgia and doesn’t love Texas at all.

He sees himself as a citizen of the world, as they used to say in the 1950s, and feels at home in the world at large. Quite often, more than he does here in the Land of the Free. And there is an unsettling sense that he sees himself as a world sovereign — a caliph, Khan or Kennedy — whose task it is to bring final conquest on behalf of the rest of the world to those rural and regressive pockets in the American heartland where they still listen to George Jones and Hank Williams.

Quigley next gets into the meat of his article when he discusses that, despite Obama's falling popularity, there are few Republicans willing to take him on directly. Notably, Quigley cites two Republican leaders who have shown they are willing to challenge Obama's disastrous policies: Governor Perry and Governor Palin:

The president is operating out of a fundamental misunderstanding of history, which might be called the New York view: that the tenor and temperament of America today is the same as it was when Eisenhower handed the keys over to Kennedy. It is a static view of history, but history is dynamic, not static. The South and Texas were still honorably submissive in 1960 to the will and whims of New York & Co. as per the conditions of conquest set in 1865. No longer. And so today Perry speaks up. Last week he wrote a letter to the EPA asking it to withdraw its finding that greenhouse gases threaten Americans, alleging the findings are based on manipulated data. Sarah Palin opposed points of the Copenhagen agreements as well, with an editorial in The Washington Post.

After discussing the importance of Governor Palin's Tonight Show appearance, which we discussed in a post yesterday, Quigley ends his piece with the following (emphasis mine):

Dan Balz has a convincing essay in The Washington Post this week making the claim that the future of the Republican Party rests with the governors. He cites Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, Perry, Palin, Louisiana’s Bobby Jindal, Mississippi’s Haley Barbour, Minnesota’s Tim Pawlenty and others. But Palin and Perry are speaking to the public while the others are speaking to the faithful. They are being brave when it is time to be brave, which is now.

Quigley is exactly right here. Most of the Republicans are playing it safe, hoping that the public will turn to the GOP when Obama's horrendous socialist policies result in economic and foreign policy disaster ala Jimmy Carter. These "play it safe" Republicans are making a big mistake. The Republican brand is still toxic for many voters who see Obama as simply following the same path, albeit on steroids, as the Republicans in Washington have followed over the last ten years. Simply hoping your political opponent slips up may be the safe way in their minds, but it's no way to build a majority.

Governor Palin and a few others, Rick Perry being one of them, are boldly leading the opposition to Obama and his administration. Governor Palin was correct to endorse Governor Perry in his re-election bid, despite the contrary advice of some. Just yesterday, in an article in the Washington Post, Rick Perry had this to say when asked about the importance of Governor Palin's endorsement:

Oh my God. Sarah, number one, is a longtime friend, both personal and professional. I greatly admire her. I think she is a principled, serious conservative that is wildly popular in a lot of different circles. I'll take that.

The gallant efforts of both Governor Perry and Governor Palin need to be rewarded. The other governors Balz cites above are, for the most part, sitting on the sidelines which is no way to inspire people to participate in a conservative resurgence. Governor Palin and others, like Rick Perry, are walking the walk as well as talking the talk. They have earned both our support...and our respect.

47 comments:

cookboy,  December 14, 2009 3:48 PM  

Yep, 2 against a bazillion. But the bazillion ain't got a pair among 'em.

Whitney,  December 14, 2009 3:55 PM  

Who are these "faithful" that Pawlenty, Romney and co. are supposedly speaking to?


By the way, all of this positive Sarah news has made my officemate suspicious of why I'm smiling at work.

Anonymous,  December 14, 2009 3:58 PM  

So, is Perry still in a dog fight for governor?
My neighbor to the south, but I haven't been keeping up.
dr v

GAHanson,  December 14, 2009 4:01 PM  

I see Dick Armey in a CBS interview has come out in support of Pawlenty.  He does say this about Gov. Palin, though:

Q: We haven't talked about Sarah Palin. What do you think it is it about her that drives the left up the wall?

The first thing that drives them nuts about Sarah Palin is that she's authentic. She is who she is, on her own terms. In many respects she's everything that Hillary Clinton pretends to be. She became the governor of the state of Alaska not because she was someone's daughter or sister or wife, but because on her own terms on her own initiative, she became the governor.

She's not wishy-washy. She says exactly what she means and makes it quite clear so there can be no misunderstanding. Clarity is considered by the left to be intellectually diminished as opposed to obfuscation.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/12/14/taking_liberties/entry5976284.shtml

Notice that he did not say anything about her having a leading role in the gop, and had to be specifically asked before even mentioning her.  I'm guessing that

Good news:  Having dropped to #2 on Amazon yesterday, Going Rogue is back to being #1 in all books.

cookboy,  December 14, 2009 4:04 PM  

Because sometimes, unfortunately, a mom has to show a boy how to be a man!

Chris of Rights,  December 14, 2009 4:05 PM  

I agree with most of this. In fact, I would strongly consider voting for Perry in 2012. I would even look at him and weigh him against Sarah. The only other "darkhorse" Governor that I keep hearing mentioned is my own Mitch Daniels. And, let me say that My Man Mitch (campaign slogan) has been mostly a terrific governor, he has no shot whatsoever at the White House. He doesn't have the charisma to win a national election in the 21st century. That's unfortunate, but true. To be honest, I'm not sure he would win my endorsement in any event. I disagree with him nearly as often as I agree. But I will say this about Mitch. He has been consistent and stuck to his principals. I can only think of one campaign promise he has violated, and that was the one he said during his initial run that he would not run for re-election.

In an age where political promises mean nothing, that's a nearly incredible feat from Mitch. Something that he has in common with Sarah.

As an aside, it made his re-election a cakewalk, even when Indiana went for Obama. Something other politicans should notice. The argument is simple:

Q: Did you vote for Mitch in 2004?
A: Yes

Q: Why?
A: Because he said he was going to do X, Y, and Z.

Q: Did he do X, Y, and Z?
A: Yes

Q: So you'll vote for him again?
A:Yes

It's hard to vote against someone who has kept their campagin promises if you voted for him previously.

Victoria,  December 14, 2009 4:07 PM  

A month ago I came to the same conclusion about the governors that are not speaking up against healthcare and other important issues--they are more concerned with their political futures than they are about what is happening now.  They'll play it safe and then closing to the election they will come forward. 

To me, Sarah and Rick Perry are the only two who show that they really care by speaking up now--when something can be done to prevent legislation that will be harmful to America and Americans.

A couple cute cartoons at http://drawfortruth.wordpress.com/ .  There not about Sarah--but they are revelant to what is happening in our country today.

terri,  December 14, 2009 4:09 PM  

Doug,
Great write up...

"Quigley is exactly right here. Most of the Republicans are playing it safe, hoping that the public will turn to the GOP when Obama's horrendous socialist policies result in economic and foreign policy disaster ala Jimmy Carter. These "play it safe" Republicans are making a big mistake. The Republican brand is still toxic for many voters who see Obama as simply following the same path, albeit on steroids, as the Republicans in Washington have followed over the last ten years. Simply hoping your political opponent slips up may be the safe way in their minds, but it's no way to build a majority."

Couldn't have said it better myself.  ;-)

Beehive,  December 14, 2009 4:10 PM  

Speaking of Perry and Palin

<span>Just picked this up on twitter. Looks like Rick Perry will be introducing the Guv at that National Conservative Symposium in January. I wonder if the Guv will campaign for Perry then? 
 
<span>@<span>TeaPartyPR</span> and don't forget Texas Gov Perry will intro Sarah Palin on Sunday 1-24-10 see U there! thx PLS RT</span></span>

wisetrog,  December 14, 2009 4:12 PM  

Rick Perry is awesome. He'll be an important part of Sarah's cabinet. I hope he'll put KBH out of her misery. I hope we can get get Michael Williams to the senate.

wisetrog,  December 14, 2009 4:12 PM  

Probably, like most others he reached out to Sarah and she played coy.

cookboy,  December 14, 2009 4:17 PM  

Maybe 'Sing along with Mitch' would work with the older set.

terri,  December 14, 2009 4:18 PM  

Chris,

I have been lurking and writing on this site for a while now. I hate to admit how ignorant I was prior to it.
It seems like everyday there is  a politician that's steps up or is mentioned here that I have never heard of before (she says sheepishly). I now take a second look (most of the time a first look..lol), at these guys instead of just staying ignorant. So thanks for the "name dropping"...;-)

I don't know if it's me or if the conditions are just right, but we're starting to see the "diamonds in the rough" so to speak and the conservatve outlook is looking better all the time.

DefCon66,  December 14, 2009 4:21 PM  

I refuse to vote for a GOP insider period, they have shown themselves to be almost as bad as the Dems. They all will lie if it suits their needs at the moment so Sarah is who my vote goes to in '12 even if I have to write her in because I believe her when she speaks. I'm disgusted with these scumbags and trust them as far as I can throw them and now I concider myself a independent conservative.

DefCon66,  December 14, 2009 4:27 PM  

...oh and by the way, the GOP has gotten it's last dollar out of me. All contributions from me will go to SarahPAC now.

MarkRNY,  December 14, 2009 4:29 PM  

I wonder if Quigley, et al reads the posts here? Sounds awful familiar. Anyone here could have written this article. Glad it's slowly sinking in though. They can't help it if they're slooooww.

MarkRNY,  December 14, 2009 4:31 PM  

You probably DID say it yourself!

terri,  December 14, 2009 4:33 PM  

Beehive,

Showing my ignorance (again...lol), I had to look up what the heck the "National Conservative Symposium" was.
Here's what I found....

"The National Conservative Symposium will bring together conservative grass-roots leaders and community organizers from across America at one of the nation’s premiere resorts for a weekend of intense discussion, education and training. The objective of the Symposium is to inspire and empower conservative activists to take back their political party and to take the country back to constitutional governance and fiscal responsibility by organizing for political action in their local communities and then projecting their voice and actions all the way to Washington, DC."Another name for "Tea Party Convention"?If so...It looks like Sarah is the "official/unofficial" leader of said movement. It looks official....Other speakers...HannityLaura IngrahamMichelle MalkinKevin JacksonBtw....Those looking to go....1/22 - 1/24. At Hyatt Hill Country Resort, in San Antonio. The price.....$749/night...room inclusive. http://teapartysupport.com/

MarkRNY,  December 14, 2009 4:34 PM  

Good question. Whoever they are, they're not hearing much, or they're hearing it three or four weeks after Sarah said it 1st.

terri,  December 14, 2009 4:37 PM  

<span>Beehive,  
 
Showing my ignorance (again...lol), I had to look up what the heck the "National Conservative Symposium" was.  
Here's what I found....  
 
"The National Conservative Symposium will bring together conservative grass-roots leaders and community organizers from across America at one of the nation’s premiere resorts for a weekend of intense discussion, education and training. The objective of the Symposium is to inspire and empower conservative activists to take back their political party and to take the country back to constitutional governance and fiscal responsibility by organizing for political action in their local communities and then projecting their voice and actions all the way to Washington, DC.</span>
<span></span>
<span>Another name for "Tea Party Convention"?</span>
<span>If so...It looks like Sarah is the "official/unofficial" leader of said movement. </span>
<span></span>

terri,  December 14, 2009 4:38 PM  

^^^^^
<span>Other speakers...</span>
<span>Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Michelle Malkin, and Kevin Jackson</span>
<span></span> 
<span>Btw....Those looking to go....1/22 - 1/24. At Hyatt Hill Country Resort, in San Antonio. The price.....$749/night...room inclusive. </span>
<span></span>
<span><span>http://teapartysupport.com/</span></span>

Beehive,  December 14, 2009 4:41 PM  

Yeah. I saw that. So it is in Texas, Gov Perry is introducing the Guv so maybe a little campaigning for Perry or is it too early yet?

terri,  December 14, 2009 4:42 PM  

^^^never too early..lol

terri,  December 14, 2009 4:45 PM  

Ya know, Gov Perry introducing Sarah is preety good.
But my favorite intro that I would pay lots of money to see..(is $50 bucks lots of money?)...
Is Mark Levin introducing the "Rebuplican nominee for president"...Sarah Palin.

Beehive,  December 14, 2009 4:50 PM  

I see your $50 and raise you $5!!

Yes. The lefty heads would all be exploding simultaneously.

Kaboom!!

MarkRNY,  December 14, 2009 4:54 PM  

Where is it? I wouldn't mind going.

yogi41,  December 14, 2009 5:03 PM  

I loved Mitch Miller (and no, I'm not "old"). :)  I love his Christmas album - Mitch and the Gang!

Western,  December 14, 2009 5:05 PM  

Smart and confident politicians know the difference between speaking to the public and speaking with the public.  Sarah is of the latter category, in my opinion.  For politicians, the demarcation line between arrogance and genuineness is delicate and fragile.

However unlike any current politician and public figure, Sarah's personal and political authenticity erases that all too familiar boundary between the egotistical politician and a legitimate public servant.  When Sarah comments on public issues/concerns, she is speaking as one of us and not as a narcissistic or arrogant official.

Western,  December 14, 2009 5:06 PM  

Smart and confident politicians know the difference between speaking to the public and speaking with the public.  Sarah is of the latter category, in my opinion.  For politicians, the demarcation line between arrogance and genuineness is delicate and fragile.

However unlike any current politician and public figure, Sarah's personal and political authenticity erases that all too familiar boundary between the egotistical politician and a legitimate public servant.  When Sarah comments on public issues/concerns, she is speaking as one of us and not as a narcissistic or arrogant official.

cookboy,  December 14, 2009 5:20 PM  

I'm not either, but my kids might argue!

Beehive,  December 14, 2009 5:22 PM  

It looks like it is in San Antonio.

Bill in Baltimore,  December 14, 2009 5:25 PM  

Whitney,

I have a Sarah bobblehead in my cube, in a corner.

When I turn around to converse with people, I can glance at her and realize hope is on the way . . .

Bill in Baltimore,  December 14, 2009 5:28 PM  

she didn't play coy, she just didn't play.

that's one of the main beefs of the old guys in DC, she never gave them a glance.
- and she'll need them, and their sons and daughters, to be effective.

but, I told my friend:
- her conservative positions are well known
- her track record is amazing
- she loves Reagan

What is not to like about that ? Please explain.

it's the Cal Thomas syndrome - "the road to the White House comes through me"

MarkRNY,  December 14, 2009 5:29 PM  

Thanks Beehive. Maybe I can swing it.

Lynda,  December 14, 2009 5:40 PM  

Did someone forget to tell us that Pawlenty was the leader of the Tea Party movement...read the CBS post per GAHanson's post

SilentWatcher,  December 14, 2009 5:43 PM  

Now we know the identity of Palin's 2012 running mate: Rick Perry. Palin-Perry 2012!

SilentWatcher,  December 14, 2009 5:44 PM  

My favorite would be Levin introducing "President-elect Sarah Palin!"

FredHeadBill,  December 14, 2009 5:45 PM  

Earleir ment to click like but hadn't logged in and hit flag by mistake

Anonymous,  December 14, 2009 5:47 PM  

Perry probably killed his chances at a nat'l ticket when he started bloviating about Texas ceceding from the Union.
Although my husband and I joke that we're heading for Texas if the do. (only about 3 hrs for us)
dr. v

Anonymous,  December 14, 2009 5:48 PM  

Yes. Huck is one of the few Governors whose talked about what a huge financial impact the health care bill will have on the states.
dr. v

Anonymous,  December 14, 2009 5:51 PM  

Ouch. I don't like the "premier resort" thing.
Not that I think they should get together at Motel 6. But I think it's real important that they maintain their "regular people" creds.

dr. v

Anonymous,  December 14, 2009 5:54 PM  

OT
but I have a new favorite quote from Rogue
When Track tells the guv:
"even the fruit tastes better at Granma Heath's"
brahahahahahahahaha

Izzy,  December 14, 2009 6:00 PM  

Sarah understands us, relates to us, and speaks our langauge.  She lives and breathes the same life experiences.  I have NEVER supported a public servant so adamantly as I do for Gov. Palin.  That's why sarahPAC is a budget item for me.  I donate monies monthly.

yogi41,  December 14, 2009 6:10 PM  

After eating chili for the 3rd time that week! That was great. :)

TexMex,  December 14, 2009 6:13 PM  

Chris of Rights,

I attended Purdue from 2001-2005 and was a member of the College Republicans. When Mitch Daniels ran for office in 2004, we CRs helped out with his campaign and he stopped by Purdue several times. I still have a green "My Man Mitch" t-shirt. He seemed like a nice guy, but didn't have a compelling personality and from a completely shallow perspective he didn't strike me as presidential material. Now, I've since moved back to my home state of Texas, and I haven't kept up with Indiana politics. He may have more spark in him now, but I don't see him as a huge threat to Pres. Obama in 2012.
Regarding Gov. Perry: I would not vote for him as President. He's an okay Gov, and has helped keep Texas afloat during this recession, but he's prone to theatrics i.e. hinting at secession and a lot of Texans are agnostic towards him concerning the 2010 elections. Most don't seem to like Kay Bailey Hutchison rather than like Gov. Perry. Anyway, as many Texans on this board with tell you, the Texas Governorship is a weak office compared to other State Governors. That isn't a knock against Gov. Perry. It's just compared to Gov. Palin, Gov. Perry's time probably wasn't as productive.

Just my two cents, man! Both Perry and Daniels are good foot soldiers. Glad to have them on our team.

TexMex,  December 14, 2009 6:20 PM  

Ha! Motel 6! That would be interesting ;)

JeanA,  December 14, 2009 8:58 PM  

Hannity is rolling something out in January.

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP