(Gulp)...UK Taxpayers Group Works Out Copenhagen Cost....$215 Million...
The Taxpayers Alliance is a campaign group here in the UK that ought to bring a warm glow to Governor Palin’s heart.
Here is the TPA’s Mission Statement
The TPA's mission is:
• To reverse the perception that big government is necessary and irreversible
• To explain the benefits of a low tax economy
• To give taxpayers a voice in the corridors of power
To this end, the TaxPayers' Alliance will:
• Oppose all tax rises
• Oppose EU tax harmonisation
• Seek the abolition of inheritance tax
• Criticise all examples of wasteful and unnecessary spending
• Champion opportunities for votes on tax and spend
(Memo to the Governor – I am sure you would be a welcome guest at the TPA when you cross the pond....)
They have just done a line by line estimated cost analysis of the Copenhagen Climate conference and wonder if it will really give value for money....
From 7 December to 18 December 15,000 delegates will descend on Copenhagen to work towards negotiating a treaty to succeed Kyoto and reduce emissions. However, even before the conference has begun, there have been questions over whether a new deal will be struck. US President Barack Obama and Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen have conceded that the conference is unlikely to produce a treaty to replace the Kyoto Protocol, and are beginning to make arrangements for a delay until the next conference, in Mexico. British officials also do not expect a new deal, with binding restrictions, to be agreed this year.
In light of that and the large number of other international conferences that have been held this year, taxpayers around the world – who will be supporting the conference and the delegations being sent there – might question whether the conference will constitute good value for money. This research note provides the first estimate of the total cost of the conference.
A conservative estimate of the total cost of Copenhagen is £130 million ($215 million, €143 million).
This estimate is based on the Danish government budget and the costs to participating
governments of sending 15,000 delegates – including flights, accommodation, food,
conferencing facilities and salaries paid to delegates while they are at the conference. It is a conservative estimate as it leaves out costs such as the need for supporting work by staff in the home countries.
Read the rest here and just ask yourself - how many extra lives could be saved in the world this year if that amount was added to the global malaria elimination programme....







6 comments:
Woo, thanks for highlighting the organisation! I'm also from Britain and have often wondered where the support was for common sense. I knew about the Adam Smith Institute but mainly I've been relying on American groups like the Cato Institute, Von Mises Institute and the Heritage Foundation for my information on free markets, limited government and low taxes.
I'll have to pay close attention to the TaxPayers' Alliance - thanks!
Sarah would be the PERFECT fit to speak for this group!
I am so glad this group is calling out the Copenhagen conference for what it is- a easte of time and money at which nothing will be accomplished (other than to warm the air a bit by all the flights and all the poitically correct "bullcrap" that is flying around over there).
I am really, really frightened, not by global warming (which is hugely overstated and overrated), but by the schemes these clowns are cooking up to deal with it. It's all going to do more damage than good, (except to the pocketbooks of the carbon trading speculators.) Plus undervcut the sovereignty of nations.
This morning I'm finding it very hard to get worked up over global warming. Where I live it's
-23 with the wind chill. And that cold air is coming down from the arctic. Maybe the GW fanatics will tell us that all that cold air is causing the polar ice caps to melt. Our last two winters have been two of the snowiest and coldest in years. But guess what - they told us it was all due to global warming!
Yes, Sarah would be perfect for this group!
<span>I am so glad they are calling out the Copenhagen conference for what it is- a waste of time and money at which nothing will be accomplished (other than to warm the air a bit by all the flights and all the poitically correct "bullcrap" that is flying around over there). Terribly ironic.
I am really, really frightened, not by global warming (which is hugely overstated and overrated), but by the schemes these clowns are cooking up to deal with it. It's all going to do more damage than good, (except to the pocketbooks of the carbon trading speculators.) Plus undercut the sovereignty of nations.
This morning I'm finding it very hard to get worked up over global warming. Where I live it's
-23 with the wind chill. And that cold air is coming down from the arctic. Maybe the GW fanatics will tell us that all that cold air is causing the polar ice caps to melt. Our last two winters have been two of the snowiest and coldest in years. But guess what - they told us it was all due to global warming!</span>
It seems as if liberals are willing to shell out a lot of other people's money to talk about "problems" rather than to solve them or to actually determine the validity of the problem (i.e. climategate).
Your closing question is interesting. It would interesting to know how many lives would be saved if the money were spent on such a program. For liberals, it's often about making a splash rather than making a difference. Just think of how many lives could have been saved if DDT regulations had been different over the past 50 years, but Rachel Carson's Silent Spring made such a big splash using misrepresentative data that DDT regulations were put in place. The banning of the use of DDT allowed malaria to spread resulting in thousands if not millions of lives lost. Mark Levin devotes a whole chapter of his book, Liberty and Tyrrany, to this topic of envirofascism.
So what? that is such a pidly, insignificant amount compared to the annual costs (assessment, raxes, contributions, call it what you will) that will we will be oblige to pay (and penalized if we dont_ if Obama signs the Copenhagen agreement.
We are talking about percentages of GDP! that will be provided to an unelected unacountable group (the COP). Please keep things in perspective.
wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf
Post a Comment