Levi Seeks Publicity Instead of Tripp's Well-being
Yesterday we learned that Bristol Palin, Governor Palin's eldest daughter, filed for sole custody of her son, Tripp E. Johnston-Palin, in early November of this year. This should never have been reported on in the first place. Bristol, who has borne all of Levi's attention-seeking lies and antics with quiet dignity, didn't want to publicize this at all. But Levi pushed to have it open to the public. Why would he want this custody proceeding to be played out in public? The answer is pretty simple and obvious: because he wants the media attention. It's his bread and butter after all. He makes his living lying about the Palins. In her affidavit, Bristol made a compelling argument for keeping the custody proceedings closed to the public:
Due to the overwhelming media interest in my family and in Levi Johnston, I believe it would be in Tripp's best interest for this custody matter to be closed, and for everyone associated with this case to refrain from talking to the media about this case.
[...]
I believe that despite everyone's best intentions to remain civil in this case, media involvement will have a negative impact on this matter, and a negative impact on Tripp. In this day and age of the internet, media stories remain available for years, even decades, after they are first published, and anything printed in the media (whether it is true or not) will be available to Tripp when he is old enough to read.
[...]
I do not believe that subjecting a one year old child to intense media scrutiny is healthy or desirable. If this case were open to the public I believe it would just cause more drama and friction between me and Levi, which would not be in Tripp's best interests.
We fully agree with Bristol's reasoning. Accordingly, we didn't want to post on this matter at all. C4P's view in regard to Levi and his antics has always been that Tripp's well being must be foremost in our minds. However, now that Levi has fought to make the custody hearings public, and Governor Palin's political opponents are already using this to take shots at her, we felt it was necessary to correct the distortions and lies being presented.
It's clear that Levi views this custody process as an opportunity for more publicity that he hopes will further his modeling/acting/porn career. This is reflected in the argument he presented for encouraging as much public involvement as possible:
"I do not feel protected against Sarah Palin in a closed proceeding," Johnston said in an affidavit accompanying Butler's filings. "I hope that if it is open she will stay out of it. ... I think a public case might go a long way in reducing Sarah Palin's instinct to attack and allow the real parties in this litigation, Bristol and I, to work things out a lot more peacefully than we could if there is any more meddling from Sarah Palin."
It's difficult to read Levi's nonsense with a straight face. This custody process is between Levi and Bristol, but Levi knows that he will receive more attention by attacking Governor Palin. His only intention here is to create a media circus that he can capitalize on while Bristol continues to focus on her son's well being and future.
Bristol addressed this lie in her affidavit:
My mother, Sarah Palin, is not involved in this custody matter other than as a grandmother, so Levi Johnston has no need to be "protected" from her. This case is between me and Levi; my mother has nothing to do with it.
She also brought to the court's attention Levi's on-going attacks on her mother and her family:
As can be seen in Levi Johnston's Affidavit and his Opposition to the Motion to Show Cause he is still attacking my mother and accusing her of being "vindictive," of "meddling," and of intending to "run roughshod" over Levi's "very bones." None of this is true; my mother is not involved in this case. What is clear so far is that Levi has gone repeatedly to national media to spread falsehoods and malign my family - a family that has provided round-the-clock care, love, and affection for our son Tripp. Levi wants these proceedings public to continue to make a spectacle of this custody dispute for his own self-promotion.
Well said, Bristol.
We have documented Levi's numerous lies told in the pursuit of self-promotion, and I'm sure we can expect more during these proceedings. Levi's, and his attorney Rex Butler's, strategy is to make Governor Palin the issue so they can create a situation in which they can profit.
Apparently, however, Levi hasn't seen fit to pay for his son's expenses with the money he's been earning off the Palin name, as Thomas Van Flein, Bristol's attorney, noted in the petition for custody:
To date, Bristol and her family have provided nearly 100% of the child care for Tripp, and paid for almost all costs associated with Tripp's upbringing. Not until October, 8th, 2009, nearly 10 months after Tripp was born, did Levi pay his first dollar to help support his child.
With this in mind, one has to question how interested Levi is in Tripp. Although he's been invited to visit Tripp anytime, he's only done so sporadically. He seems more interested in jetting off to Los Angeles and New York to catch the next gig that presents an opportunity to attack the Palins.
Despite these concerns, Bristol still thinks that Levi should have access to Tripp, and has proposed that the court set-up a visitation schedule for him to spend time with Tripp. That is, if Levi has the time and inclination to do so.






306 comments:
Screw you Levi Johnston! Have you no shame at all?
I doubt that Levi is the one motivating Levi's lawyer.
The forces that are trying to hurt Sarah are using Levi and Tripp to attack Sarah.
Levi is willing.
AH, Yo estoy numero uno.
Justice will come.
This decision to make it public, feels like what happened to Obama's opponent, Ryan?, in Illinois.
And the low-life, scum of the earth, evil, gossipers in this country, are rubbing their hands together, saying mwaahhhhaaahhhaaaa, in anticipation of this spectacle.
Stinking losers.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2012/nebraska/election_2012_nebraska_senate
"<span>Nelson's health care vote is clearly dragging his numbers down. Just 17% of Nebraska voters approve of the deal their senator made on Medicaid in exchange for his vote in support of the plan. Overall, 64% oppose the health care legislation, including 53% who are Strongly Opposed. In Nebraska, opposition is even stronger than it is nationally.</span>
<span>
<p>Fifty-six percent (56%) of voters in the state believe that passage of the legislation will hurt the quality of care, and 62% say it will raise costs.
</p><p>The House and Senate have passed different versions of the health care legislation and now will try to agree on a plan to pass early in 2010. Because every Democratic vote is required to pass the legislation in the Senate, Nelson’s vote is essential. If Nelson votes to block final passage of the health care plan, he would still trail Heineman but would be in a much more competitive situation.
</p><p>
</p><p>When survey respondents were asked how they would vote if Nelson blocks health care reform, 47% still pick Heneman while 37% would vote to keep the incumbent in office. Twenty percent (20%) of those who initially said they’d vote for Heineman say they’d switch to supporting Nelson. Another six percent (6%) of Heineman supporters say they’re not sure what they’d do if Nelson stops the health care plan from becoming law.
</p><p>If Nelson votes to block health care reform, 10% of all voters would prefer a third-party option. Most of those who would prefer a third choice initially said they would vote for Nelson.
</p><p>Overall, 40% of Nebraska voters have a favorable opinion of Nelson while 55% have an unfavorable view. Those figures include 12% with a Very Favorable opinion while 34% hold a Very Unfavorable view.
</p><p>Twenty-six percent (26%) say Nelson has done a good or excellent job in the health care debate. Forty-seven percent (47%) give him poor marks.
</p><p>Forty-two percent (42%) say their senator has been too supportive of President Obama’s agenda while 13% say he’s not been supportive enough. Thirty percent (30%) say he’s got the balance about right."
</p><p>
</p></span>
And it happened to Obama's Senate primary opponent IIRC.
I worry that Obama or Emmanuel or Axelrod will lean on the judge to make a judgement in Levi's favor to try to further embarrass the Palin family.
Look at the big picture, folks: If Levi 'had anything' on the Palins, they would never have gone near a courtroom.
They let this little creep spew his crap all over the country and dig his own grave.
Bristol will get custody with Levi granted visitation but now he's going to be stuck with some fairly large child support payments and he's going to have to reveal his sources of income. Also note that Butler says Levi is going to 'seek new counsel' which tells you that the gravy train from Obama has been cut off.
I don't want to hear about that rat anymore, I was willing to cut him a break, but when you slander
the parents of your son, for money and fame, well that's lower than moose droppings
I hope the Palins have hired PI's to put 24-7 surveilance on Levi, Tank, and Sexy Rexy. And hopefully they've got loads of dirt on them.
A judge actually agreed to make this public ? He should be removed from the bench.
What possible interest is being served through these public proceedings ?
All I'm going to say about this is a comparision of the two lawyers statements:
From Levi's lawyer: "Simply put, this matter is public in nature, the courts are not refuges for the scions of the elite to obtain private dispensation of their legal matters because the public at large has an interest in the proceedings" (emphasis mine)
From Bristol's lawyer: "Due to the overwhelming media interest in my family and in Levi Johnston, I believe it would be in Tripp's best interest for this custody matter to be closed, and for everyone associated with this case to refrain from talking to the media about this case." (emphasis mine)
That tells us all we need to know about who Levi is truly looking out for and who Bristrol is truly looking out for.
This case needs to be tried in Tripp's best interest. We need to butt out, keep quiet, and pray.
That's all I'm going to say.
Deadbeat dads are the scum of the earth . . . unless of course, the grandmother is SP.
This reeks so bad it makes my blood boil.
Where are the adults ?
Let me guess... the judge is a democrat.
Rex Butler or whatever his name is is an Obama henchman. He says that the public is interested in these procedings..well, I am a member of the public and I can care less about these procedings. This has nothing to do with me..in fact, if I were Sarah, I would stay away from these hearings altogether because it has nothing to do with her..that will really piss off Levi becuase he wants Sarah to come, make this about her..if she doesnt come, then it will be about TRIPP..and as far as why the judge allowed it to remain public..why do I have a feeling he has D next to his name..D meaning Democrat..most judges are Dems
Daniel, thanks for the post... agree we and It should not have to be publicly involved.
With that said, out hearts go out to Bristol and Sarah and Family once again... Levi will regret one day being had by devil seekers who wish to do harm on the Palin Family... and due to his blindness can't see they not only don't have his best interest in mind they really wish to him the same results.
Without the pretense of being high and mighty sounding... I would only hope we here would be extra careful what we say and do on this site...no one wishes any harm but how innocently it can happen.
This is really sickening!-- "Under Less than Ideal Circumstances"... as Sarah often says... but like she also says... "I chooses to build up not to tear down"(think that came from her resignation speech)... and she always does It with that million dollar smile and knowing she is following Gods path! That's powerful!
The worst part is that Levi will apparently "star" in a reality TV show in the near future. I guess he wants the custody battle to be the show's drama.
If that happens we should boycott whichever media outlet broadcasts it and of course boycott the sponsors of the show.
All I can say is that it is common practice in custody to issue gag orders that prohibits parents and often times immediate family to the child's stents from making any public derogatory statement or private but in front of the child about the other parent and their family. This is, of course, to protect the child. If Bristol's attorney is worth anything, they will continue to fight for this. It can still be a public trial but poor old Levi won't be able to say a word.
My brother and ex-sister-in-law still have this restraint on them and my niece is now 13. That order prohibiting derogatory statements was served on my brother, current sister in law, my mother, father, me and SIL's mom. It was also served on my ex SIL, her parents, adult sister & brother and anyone she dates. Yet, their court battle was public record.
Yes hopefully they will hire Thomas Magnum, Orville "Rick" Wright, TC, and of course Jonathon Qualye Higgins. ;)
Levi is not going to be a reality TV star. There is no interest in him and a number of Alaska based programs have tanked in the ratings. Deadliest Catch and Ice Road Truckers do well but the rest are snoozers. Both History Channel and Discovery opted out of covering the Iditarod due to poor numbers so what kind of numbers can Ricky Hollywood and his weed smoking hockey pals attract?
Checked out huffpo and daily beast. NONE have the levi story. Hmmmmmmmm. Those sites will post any negative Sarah information for days on end. The Palin's have handled the matter with class. Levi has decided to crawl around in the mud. He now wishes to drag the Palin's into his personal cesspool. I just hope Alaskan justice finally stands up for Sarah and does the right thing.
Tool.
Amen. There is a day coming....
<span>
<p>Thought Track is back from Iraq. Where I'm from cases like this are settled between men, you know what I mean.
</p></span>
cookboy, I don't think that one word description can be improved upon. My vote for pithy comment of the day.
This might backfire on Levi if he is forced to reveal his sources of income in a public setting under penalty of perjury. You know what I mean?
The situation also reminds me of Dewey Whetsell's comments about Sarah's antagonists (paraphrasing from memory):
"Obviously none of these people are scuba divers, and evidently nobody told them that if you continue to poke and jab a barracuda it's likely to turn without warning and rip your face off. Shoulda known better."
Yes, JohnDoe made the same point, and it's spot on.
Actually, it's a she. I believe two she's. See It's a Kwazy Life blog and Red County for Thomas Lamb's AK take. He's had run-ins with the judge in question.
While I agree with you in the real world Laker fan (gasp, Celtic fan you mean!!), to the media it's ALWAYS about Sarah. If she doesn't come to the proceedings, the media will say, WHERE WAS SHE? WHAT A TERRIBLE MOM, HYPOCRITE, SHE DOESN'T SUPPORT HER DAUGHTER.
Pardon the caps, but, you know, that's what the media's story will be ... Sigh. :(
Bristol appears to have grown-up a lot in the past year...as have we all including Sarah Palin and her family.
Bristol will be fine. This will be another learning stepping stone for her. Life smacks you in the face with a shovel sometimes. Bristol is climbing to bigger and better things for her and her child.
Levi on the other hand... is descending the ladder of life.
Too bad for him.. but it appears he does not learn from his poor life choices.
As for The Palin's...I trust they will be there for support...but will let Bristol handle it! She will be fine
as will Tripp.
Exactly. Great comments Cruela.
I concur.
I don't know about you all, but I need a break from this farce. So I'm going OT to and AP story of Iowa Rep. Steve King telling the "Iowa Press" public TV show that he thinks Sarah will run for Pres and may be the only Repub who can win. He thought her career was over when she resigned - but has since changed his mind ...
http://newsminer.com/bookmark/5352360
FOlks there is nothing good about this. I mean nothing. The best that can come out of this is joint custody and some procedures in Alaska to vote activists judeges off the bench. Bristol presented a solid case for this to not go public and Levi a weak case and yet these activists judges chose to get at Sarah Palin vs Best Interest of the Child. Bristol's Lawyer even showed 2 examples of precedence in other States for his case and the judge had to look hard for a weak similar case. There is a better chance of this activists judge saying the Palins aren't competent enough to raise their child and giving Levi sole custody than the other way around. I am not trying to be MR Negative but I read the case and all documents and this was a Home Run by the Palins only to have an activists judge overturn it. What this activists judge said was "Screw the Child let Levi make a media circus out of the Palins." This is pathetic or devastating to the entire legal system in the US.
Read the Statements. Bristol's Lawyer backs everything up with facts. Levi just gives opinions.
HE will get Joint Custody with no Child support either way. This is clearly an activist judge with an agenda to make Sarah look bad (see below). Better chance of them requiring Sarah to reveal her Salary than the other way around. When a Family Court Judge chooses a media circus over the best interest of a child they have chosen their pathetic agenda.
King acknowledged he thought Palin had ended her political career when she resigned as governor last summer. But King says she's now in a stronger position than ever.
Some folks understood it almost immediately; others take a bit longer. As long as they get it at some point, that's good.
Thanks for the post, hrh.
Bingo. But see below. This is an activist judge that has it out for the Sarah. What you described is VERY Common. I would go as far to say it is dericliction of duty in this case for the Judge not to have issued such a gag order. An investigation needs to be done on these judges and they need to be disbarred immediately.
I agree.
Sometimes the judge ends up being tried (in the court of public opinion). Greta will have a field day with this, and in the end I'm confident that even more skeptics will sympathize with the Palins.
You have an estute command of the obvious. Both of them are.
They cannot turn over this child to this weasel, no matter what the reason
As Uffda and Patrick were advocating last night, we need to bathe this whole situation in prayer. Tripp, Bristol, Levi, Governor Palin, both families, the judges, the lawyers, the legal system, the media, our country.
It is such a strengthening aspect of C4P, that we can and do all come together, and lift the Palin family up in prayer. It is another way we are able to help our friends. And our nation.
In a way, this case is a microcosm example of the war for the soul of our country.
This is where a belief in Ultimate Truth and Ultimate Judgment is essential. Weeping may last for a night but joy cometh in the morning.
No, I'm not being a Pollyanna, but the "discovery" process for this trial just may backfire on Levi BIG TIME!
This judge may rue the day that she allowed her court to become a laughingstock for the Rex and Tex and Tank or whatever their names are to show their true intentions.
Let's not forget judges are people, too, subject to the same weaknesses, e.g., a desire to be in the spotlight. This judge may hold secret wishes to be the next Judge Judy and sees this as her chance.
We must pray, not lament.
that is an insult to Craftsman :P
This is really OT but a friend told me about this article at the Times Online, it is about an outpost in Afghanistan that is supposedly haunted: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/Afghanistan/article6969122.ece
Excerpt: "Despite these concerns, Bristol still thinks that Levi should have access to Tripp, and has proposed that the court set-up a visitation schedule for him to spend time with Tripp. "
------
Bristol must have her head in the clouds if she thinks that Levi should have access to levi and visitation rights. Levi will only use his access to the Palin household as openings to spread more lies about the Palins. Going by his record so far, Levi will likely also use his time with Tripp to poison the child's mind and to turn him against the Palins. Bristol needs to really grow up and make better choices, starting with her choices of sexual partners. This is bigger than her. This is part of the campaign by the Democrats to not only tarnish Sarah Palin's image, but also to overwhelm her, to wear her down, and deplete her energy so that she is less able to engage national politics. This is classic Cloward-Piven, who were disciples of Alinsky. This is classic Rahm "The Thumpin' " Emmanuel.
.
Thanks hrh for the link. The Washington Post has it also.
And thanks for the change of topic. I can only take so much of him before I gag and I definitely have had enough.
Looks like somebody needs the famous Palin touch in the elections. Oh, this endorsement is from Iowa, so another happy reason to tour the all important state. Me happy. :)
Access to Tripp and visitation rights means access to the Palin residence since Bristol still stays with her parents.
.
Let me tell you what would happen in a Real Courtroom not this Kangaroo Court.
Judge "Levi why have you not monetarily supported your child"
Levi "Because the Sarah Palin would not let me see the child"
Judge "Bristol is that true"
Bristol "No your honor it is not I am the primary and decision-maker for my child."
Judge "Levi I do not see Sarah Palin's name on this child's Birth Certificate and I do not see her sitting across from you. Do you have any evidence to the contrary if not then I cannot go with that story."
Levi "No I do not but the Palin's kept me away."
Judge "OK kid the next time you address me without saying your honor I will cahrge you with Contempt of Court. Do you understand me"
Levi "Yes your honor (in the back of his mind, jeez this isn't Joy Behar).
Judge "Did you file a visitation or Custody Case when she denied you access to your child?"
Levi "No your Honor but I did go to the media and..."
Judge "STOP right there kid. I am the one that can grant or deny you access to this child, not Larry King, not Katie Couric you need to get your head screwed on right. Did your attorney know this? If so why didn't he advise you of such?
Rex "Your honor I did"
Levi "Rex no you did not"
Judge "Order in the court. Kid you are too clueless to take care of a child. I grant full custody to Bristol."
Saying, "no right to see your child" is extreme. It is not to be done lightly. Bristol's approach is easier for a court, and the public, to accept.
Now the Kangaroo Court we will likely see
Levi "Yo Judge Sarah Palin is vindictive and I had to get back at her."
Judge "I agree I hereby declare Sarah Palin an unfit Grandmother and deny her any access to Tripp. I believe Bristol is a weak mother and I grant her only supervised visitation and the entire Palin family must release their earnings to see how much child support they owe Levi. Case dismissed."
Well, you have a point, ellen.
I think they already have.
If you're interested... Tank's son has MASSIVE issues.
Just check out his public court records.
It shows how low this President and his administration really is. That they would take the time to try to ruin a young girl's life and her son's because her mother had the audacity to challenge the "Once" says a lot about what kind of people are running our government. I thought there were no blue or red states but the United States of America.
Things keep piling up with Obama. He threatened to shut down Offut AFB in Nebraska if Nelson didn't vote his way on healthcare, the most treasonous and despicable action I have ever seen in my short life. He nominated a former critic of Governor Palin's, Larry Persily, whose ultimate goal I believe is to mess up the natural gas pipeline deal in Alaska to try to ruin Sarah. I have no doubt Obama, Axelrod, or Emmanuel arre intimately involved in this case.
I said something along these lines last night. Richard Nixon did some bad things and he was forced to resign for those actions, but at least he never threatened to shut down a military base just because a Senator wouldn't vote his way.. As far as I am concerned he has far surpassed anything that Nixon ever did by the actions I describe above. Yet he will never be called to account for these vile actions...not in this life anyway. Some people have tried to compare President David Palmer a character from 24 to President Obama, Obama is no David Palmer, he is more like Charles Logan. It really galls me how far this country has fallen in the short 22 years I have been in this world. God help us all.
Actually not true. Visitation is commonly worked out where you meet and exchange the child at a set location. My wife was divorced. I know this process very well from her.
What they want is the trial. They (Levi, his attorney and probably the judge) aren't considering the kid's best interests for a second. They want very public proceedings where all outrageous aligations will be directed against Sarah. On paper, it's evil-smart. In her case it will backfire bigtime imo. The public's aware of the lengths they'll go to damage her and Levi's already a slimey joke.
They're overplaying their hand. People with no shame do that. If I were Sarah's peeps, I'd make very public the inevitable ties to O and the Dems that the attorney, judge, etc. will end up having--and I'd do it fairly quickly.
Bristol will have to present evidence that Levi has shown little interest in Tripp, and that he has not behaved as Tripp's father, and has not fulfilled any of his responsibilities as a parent.
.
The more we discuss this, the more it focuses on Sarah as tabloid fodder vs. substance.
I would prefer to ignore it (as Sarah will do). Calling attention to family drama is NOT a good idea IMO.
So far, the courts record of doing the right thing is abismal.
This judge is an idiot but out of her stupidity only good things will come.
Now that Levi got his wish, to turn his custody into a media frenzy, he’ll end up making a fool of himself (if he still can anymore than he has so far) in front of the entire world. This will only help Bristol.
A) It will strengthen her argument that Levi is all about Levi and that he doesn’t care about his son.
B) Because of it being on the public domain, when Bristol wins her case no one will claim it was an unfair or biased ruling.
C) As much as the LSM despise Governor Palin, no one likes to come across as seeking anything else than the best interest of the child.
It’s going to get nasty but it’s going be good for the Palin’s, think of it this way, When you let Sarah be Sarah, Bristol be Bristol and Levi be Levi, who wins?
When all is said and done, Levi will be history never to be heard of again.
Oh yeah, regarding Obama's DIRTY, SHAMELESS, HEARTLESS tactics, see Ann Coulter's Guilty. She shows how in one of BO's campaigns he had the divorce records of both his primary AND his general election opponents unsealed. (Question: What's the point of sealing them if they're so easily unsealed?) One of his opponents was Jim Ryan, former husband of Jeri Ryan (Seven of Nine), and they had sealed their records to PROTECT THEIR AUTISTIC SON.
Did Obama or his campaign honchos care? NOPE.
So why should they care now, when the child in question is in great health?
This whole episode re: Rex and Tank doing BO's dirty work had BO's handiwork all over it.
This is why we must study history. To recognize what's happening in the present.
There is nothing new under the sun.
<span>Bristol will have to present evidence that Levi has shown little interest in Tripp, and that he has not behaved as Tripp's father, and has not fulfilled any of his responsibilities as a parent. Levi's standing as a father is dubious since he and Bristol were never married. To him it is all just wild oats.</span>
<span>.</span>
Charter
I love Dewey and his piece... I think Im probably about his age and have a copy of his remarks right here on my desk... have read It a hundred times and still get charged up!... I relate so much to his take on Sarah and see the same things he does in her even though he is right there in Alaska. I take heart in his ability, coming from his generation, to see Sarah the Women as equal!
Being around men my age, mid sixties, I all to often here them say... "I just don't believe she can do It" or "can't see her as President", meaning a women?... followed by this stomach turning statement... "but she is a real looker" and laughing with that disgusting tone!
My wife and I sat right across the isle from one such fellow on a bus at the College Of The Ozarks talking to another this way... I couldn't take it!... told him go the jail house or republican party head quarters in Alaska if you want first hand knowledge from other old farts that thought the same thing!, just kinda stared at him a bit... we thankfully de-boarded about that time.
Nancy
A million thanks... and hopefully millions of prayers.
Insulting the judge may not be good strategy. Judges can get miffed.
And there it is on AOL's sign-on page-
"Bristol Palin Sue's for Sole Custody-She wants sole custody of her son --
and allegations of misbehavior
are already leaking out."
This will backfire big. Only the Left doesn't see Bristol and Sarah as the sympathetic parties here. If it weren't for the pain it's going to cause the Palins, I'd love them to push this.
Not this time O! We won't let you.
On O'Reilly tonight (Guest Hosted by Eric Bolling)
'Is it Legal?' Segment
Bristol Palin embroiled in custody scandal
Sarah Palin's daughter Bristol is embroiled in a custody case that has become public.
This should be good!
Levi, you are an embarassment to all Alaskans. You and your pimps Rex 'I-wanna-be-Al-Sharpton' Butthead lawyer and bloated blimp punk of a 'bodyguard' are hopefully never to be seen in our city of Fairbanks fouling up the air.....
Some of you are venting, and ignorant. It shows.
If you don't know the Alaska practice, and the extent to which public proceedings are preferred, a bit of humility would serve you well.
Judges are often clueless, and often wrong. Judges are often right. Judges who err are not necessarily evil.
Sometimes judges who follow the law are criticized by people who don't know a thing about it.
Blog commenters who claim to know what they are talking about, but don't, should spend more time looking in the mirror to find the person who is way off base, and less time attacking people who might actually be honorable, and possibly correct.
Some of you are venting, and ignorant. It shows. And it bears repeating.
Lol-Way to go EC! They make em tough in Alaska!
You are an idiot.
Rex butler (obama bot) is the problem. levi is to stupid to know what hes getting himself into.
Not in the least.
A mirror would serve you well, as would a deletion.
Well the operative word there is "men"...... 'I take off my Levi's for money' doesn't qualify.....
No doubt that Politico is keeping tabs on C4P now.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/
<span>Palin backers blast Levi.</span>
Who's Eric Bolling?? It depends if he's Sarah Friendly, a RINO or a Dem. You never know with BOR fill ins. Juan Williams filled in a couple of times. Now if it were Ingraham!...
A: understand us however. We have not seen the Alaska justice system treat Sarah well. You would think that due to her stature, some semblance of deference would be exended. Nah, fuhgetaboutit. When it comes to Sarah its open season.
The judge could use discretion. but no. its all about shafting Sarah.
It continues to amaze the broad spectrum of people (liberal, conservative, repub, dem) Sarah has managed to offend in Alaska, and to the ends that they will go to and try and destroy her.
Its absolutely vicious and unrelenting.
Indeed so.
Those who posted without taking into account the reaction that the judges, their staff, their families, and their friends, are having while reading this thread have been irresponsible.
Creating motivational clippings for the people you don't like is not wise.
Some things should only be said in private, if at all. The internet is not private.
oops, gotta run. 5:15 appt at the vets. dogs needs shots, one has a rash, and the rabbit needs her teeth checked (several have become ingrown and required extraction so she's essentially toothless, no worries, we chop her food up and she is doing great)
He is Sarah friendly Mark. Don't worry. :)
C4P posts becoming "show prep"?:)
Many people are out to get Sarah.
That does not mean that a particular judge is out to get Sarah.
Some judges are just trying to do their job.
Judges get lots of things wrong. Saying that a judge erred is not saying that a judge is evil.
But, there are lots of personal insults of the judges.
What this thread does not have is reasoned explanation of a legal error.
People can say that "this should not be the law." Fine. That is about the law.
But, if the judge erred, howso? What is the Alaska law? What is the precedent? What is the policy in Alaska? I don't see that here.
My impression is that the personal insults were hurled by people who don't know the Alaska law or practice. If so, those people have no basis for the insults. That kind of insult reflects poorly on the person doing the insulting.
He usually works at FOX Business, but he has subbed for Beck from time to time.
Yes. And more. Perhaps an attachment to a pleading in the custody case.
Who cares about Ben Smith? He is a hack just like Jonathan Martin and most everybody else at the Politburo (I am sure there are good people there). Whenever there is a story about Sarah, he always quotes out of context, inserts his own snarky bias, almost always gets the stroy wrong, and more often than not peddles nothing more than gossip. He is little better than your average HuffPo and DailyKos blogger.
You think the post is damaging?
The Scum didn't want a court date. He was telling everyone who would listen that he was going to court but did he file anything? When this is settle, it is all over for The Scum and his trashing of Sarah.
I don't think the c4p post is damaging. I say that without rereading it. My comments are about the comments. Go back and look for words that personally attack the judge's honesty, integrity, and intellect, and attack the court's fairness. Ask yourself how the judges who will decide all the issues in this case will react when they read those comments. Assume that they will read them, or be told what is being said. Those words are damaging.
If I was Bristols lawyer I would be very upset with those comments. They hurt Bristol by affecting the judges. Judges are human and often don't take criticism well. They are used to praise.
No offense but Levi wanted this proceeding public. With that comes public opinion and no GOOD judge is going to weigh public opinion regarding the best interest of a child. If the judge didn't want public opinion the the judge should resign from public office or at the very least seal the case from the public.
I have worked in the legal field, you are the one that is showing ignorance.
Lipstick, normally I'd agree, but not where O and Sarah are concerned. The lockstep adoration for one and the terror driven hatred for the other is a big factor.
Conservatives don't do well with judicial rulings for some strange reason unless it goes to the US Supreme Court (sometimes--for now). As HRH mentioned, O has a history of eliminating the competition through judicial fiat--Wham! A brand new prescedent right out of thin air.
If it happens here, it won't work. It'll cause the Palins pain, but it won't work.
Scarry! but now days seems anything and everything is possible.
Your statement suggests that your work in the "legal field" was not adequate background.
You are wise.
That is why I phrased it as C4P posts are show prep.
No need to bring C4P into the arena, C4P has nothing to do with Bristol, Bristol has nothing to do with C4P.
That is how it would be in the fair world, but I know we don't live in that world.
Palin is made of much sterner stuff than anyone Obama has confronted before.
We should also not call attention to the Christmas bomber. Maybe the other guys won't do it if they realize their underpants won't make the headline of Drudge.
Sarah should not press this but not ignore it (as she and Meg have done).
Why is it that Sarah has to SDSU when the most vile, evil manipulation of a man-child and a real child is underway ?
I scanned the c4p post. I think it is fine. It quotes from court documents. It does not comment on the judges. Reasoned criticism of Levi and his lawyers is fair game.
But is it not the usual practice that custody hearings for minors are kept private?
I believe that is so.
And is it not true that the legal documents released by both parties clearly show that Levi is not concerned about Tripp but about smearing Tripp's grandmother? That he (or his ghostwriters Obama men Rex/Tank), in fact, write more about Tripp's grandmother than about his son?
So, A, you are letting liberals tell you what you can and cannot say. It is Ben's problem that he NEVER links to the sites that spew absolutely hateful and often libelous comments about the Palins, spreading rumors that irrresponsible liberals like Ben pick up, and then whine that they're just reporting rumors.
If you're reading this Ben, be an objective journalist for once.
Hey A,
answer one f'ing question then get off your high horse:
- what interest could it possible serve to make these proceedings public ?
and what is the motivation behind Levi man-child to make the proceedings public.
Stop defending an ignoramus and asinine decisions.
Now go crawl back in your hole.
Thanks Lipstick for your comments. They are spot on.
Interesting cartoon showing Nancy and Harry's pro-abortion but anti-torture position at http://drawfortruth.wordpress.com/category/congress/
"<span>But is it not the usual practice that custody hearings for minors are kept private? </span>
<span>
I believe that is so."</span>
You believe? What is the basis for this?
In fact, the practice varies around the country, but that is irrelevant. The only relevant practice is the Alaska court in this kind of case.
"<span>And is it not true that the legal documents released by both parties clearly show that Levi is not concerned about Tripp but about smearing Tripp's grandmother? That he (or his ghostwriters Obama men Rex/Tank), in fact, write more about Tripp's grandmother than about his son? "</span>
I haven't read them, so I don't know what they say.
You want some comments to show to a judge, check-out the comments that are posted whenever Smith or Martin write their twisted stories about Sarah.
This is between Levi and Bristol. What everyone will be watching is the way the judge reacts when the Scum's side tries to bring the Grandmother into the picture.
"<span>So, A, you are letting liberals tell you what you can and cannot say. "</span>
This is fanciful.
I expressed my views. Your statement is about your imagination.
<span>You want some comments to show to a judge, check-out the comments that are posted whenever Smith or Martin write their twisted stories about Sarah.
This is between The Scum and Bristol. What everyone will be watching is the way the judge reacts when the Scum's side tries to bring the Grandmother into the picture.</span>
OT: Just heard an ad on FOX, encore presentation of BOR's interview with Palin tomorrow!
Tripp was born in late December, Levi didn't pay one cent until mid October. That is 10 months without any financial support.
He had a new truck and paid gigs with scum like Kathy Griffin last summer, so what did he do with the money he got? Wouldn't a judge have to take this into consideration when deciding what sort of parent Levi is?
<span>Hey A,
</span><span>stop defending an ignoramus and asinine decisions, and get off your high horse.
</span>
since you have all the answers,answer this:
- what possible interest does it serve to make these proceedings public ?
- what is the motivation behind Levi man-child's lawyer to make this public ?
And if it is common practice in Alaska to be a jerk of a lawyer / judge, I suppose that's ok
- that's the idiot logic you are using.
In Levi's deluded mind, a trial with him at the center will be bigger than the OJ trial.
All we want is a fair proceeding. Our (Conservative's) track record for getting one is pretty abysmal. The next time you see Al Franken on the Senate floor is an example. Their are thousands more. I'd like to know what Alaska's law is concerning public or private child custody hearings. Anyone know for sure?
On a lighter note, just read the Fox ticker and Peter King said that Sarah's the only Repub who can and win the Presidency. Are you reading that Pete from Politico? Bet you know it too.
Sarah and Tood Palin did not give up her rights to be concerned grandparents and keep a close eye on the proceedings just because she ran for Vice President.
In the last days they call evil good and good evil.
Look it up you lib-idiots
He was busy forking over all his earnings to 'Butthead' and 'Tink'. His pimps had a higher priority in his eyes than his obligation to his child.....
<span>All we want is a fair proceeding. Our (Conservative's) track record for getting one is pretty abysmal. The next time you see Al Franken on the Senate floor is an example. Their are thousands more. I'd like to know what Alaska's law is concerning public or private child custody hearings. Anyone know for sure? If this violates prescedent or even if there is no firm prescedent, that will tell a lot.
On a lighter note, just read the Fox ticker and Peter King said that Sarah's the only Repub who can and will win the Presidency. Are you reading that Pete from Politico? Bet you know it. </span>
<span>Bolling is OK, and so are the "is it legal team", though I would love to hear from Megan Kelly on this one. I'll upload the clip as soon as it's over (pending it being my channel appropriate as in general I do not upload Levi related clips)
</span>
This is where our fight for Governor Palin's family, kicks in for us. She is us, or our mom, or sister, daughter, aunt, niece, grandmother?:) and so we get a knot in our stomach, when we see her getting torn apart. And that is what all of this is about, using her heart, against her. We do not like it. We do not accept it. We will not allow it. And if that means using C4P as a place to vent, and or to huddle up in prayer for all involved, then thank you, God, for C4P and all at C4P!
This should be between Levi and Bristol, but someone with different plans, made it not so.
And this is how it has been since August 29, 2008. Governor Palin and the Palin family should be looked on as an asset and blesssing for little Tripp, but that is not what is happening, since August 29, 2008. And we are sick of it! Sick of it for the friends, staff, associates and family of Governor Palin.
If the only way we can help her is to come together and discuss the issue at hand and pray, the greatest weapon we have at our disposal, then we will not be able to fight in future battles.
I'm rambling.
I second Dan C, you are a big idiot.
A: I know judges and their habits well. If a judge is reading a blog to generate an opinion, or they are allowing their staff then that judge is setting themselves up for the mother of all appeals. If a judge is to be offened then the judges I know would take GREAT offense to a participant in a case to state publicaly that he didn't feel protected in a closed proceeding. That is equivalent to accussingvthe judge of not controlling the court room and not providing a fair proceeding. This judge should be outraged by that accusation and not by unknown non-related irrellevant commenters on a blog that the judge shouldn't be on in the first place. It might be nasty upfront but Bristol would benefit greatly in the long run if any of this was attached to any court doc (which now is public) or the judge weigh any of this.
Sorry, it was Ben from Politico and Steve King a Dem who made the statement about Sarah--even worse for Ben from Politico I'd think.
Hey Ben from Politico, did you want to grow up to be a gossip columnist?? How does it feel to be irrelevent?
Battle of the sexes.
Like a divorce case, custody battle is where women will rally around the mother.
So Bristol wins here. By extension, Sarah also wins.
Bring it on !
VIVA SARAH !
I don't think any of them have time to be concerned about a domestic issue.
Butler isn't a family attorney. He will turn this over to someone with that specialty. Bristol will also have to disclose her income.
Any judge who would allow anonymous comments on a blog to affect their decision in determining the custody of a child deserves to be called evil and stupid. Attention to blog comments sort of undermines the judge's contention that publicity in this issue doesn't matter.
I could just as easily suggest that a review of any of the gutter dwelling anti-Palin sites who celebrate "poor put upon Levi" would show comments far more offensive than anything that has ever been posted at C4P. If offensive comments from posters on a blog affect this custody case we would have to post 24/7 non-stop to come anywhere near reaching half the volume of trash already posted at sites the PuffHo, Kos and the Alaskan slime gang.
Nope you are not rambling!!!
Having spent time with my great nephew who is 6 months old..over the Holidays...I can very well
understand the fight for a child's best interest! I just pray...nobody forgets Tripp! According to all
information available....Levi is more interested in getting back at Sarah Palin and displaying his "TINY manhood"...than taking care of HIS child. Seems Levi...is the only one thus far that has forgotten...Tripp!
Excellent rambling!!
Steve King is a Repub Congressman from Iowa.
I feel the same way. Why would a judge want to do this?
Really? Why don't you talk to Jim Ryan about that one Sandra.
Yes Sandra she will. I think it will be sad that Bristol who actually does honest work for a living (I believe she works two part time jobs while going to college) will show that she makes much less money than Levi does spreading lies and gossip about his son's family for his 15 minutes of fame.
I see no ramble here. :)
Exactly, katiejane. And as someone above says, what about the spewing comments that follow most Ben posts about Sarah at Politico? Why don't you rein those in, Ben? Why don't you lament how Sarah is a victim of Ben Smith's Politico column? How about a story called "Ben Smith's Politico readers attack Sarah Palin." Is that breathless enough for you?
Nice try, Ben, trying to make Levi the aggrieved sympathetic character that us C4Pers are harming somehow. Have you ever read Guilty by Ann Coulter? She's got liberals pegged to a tee; they're always the victims. No matter if they go around saying HORRIBLE and untrue things in front of any microphone someone will shove in their faces. Somehow they are the victims. They bear no responsibility for their actions. Do you, Ben? You are responsible for all of your words and all of your links. Do you stand by your trying to paint Levi as a victim of C4P?
You'd have a much better case if you were to surmise that Levi is a victim of Rex and Tank. But dare you go there? Dare you research Rex's and Tank's history of attacking Palin - long before Levi? Which could really reveal how Rex is using Levi to get at Palin? Just look at the legal documents, please. They talk more about Sarah than about Tripp. These are Rex's words against Sarah with only a very thinly-veiled veneer of a custody case between Levi and Bristol. Shameless. Shameful. Do you have the guts to investigate that?
Levi's argument that governor Palin will not attack him if the custody hearing remain public do not make sense. Just the opposite is true. If the hearings were made private, Sarah would also remain silent, but with them being public she is now free to attack him. All though we know she wont.
I'm sorry. I don't know Jim Ryan.
Pardon my comments on this thread, guys.
I'm so tired of the media. I've really got to stop paying attention. I do for a long while and then something like this comes along and makes me so mad at the injustice.
But I have to return to my faith in Ultimate Truth and Ultimate Justice. I think I said that myself earlier in this very thread!
What is hidden will be revealed and what is in darkness will be brought to light.
Jesus said "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life" and "I am the Light of the world." God is sovereign. His will be done. The Truth will come out in the proper time.
Forgive me for my venting against Ben and others.
If anyone thinks I should delete any of my posts, please let me know and I will forthwith.
Thanks. :)
This is not about the Palins. It is about Bristol and Levi and Tripp.
Jim Ryan was the man who was going to run against Obama for the Illinois Senate seat. Before that Ryan and his wife Jeri Ryan became divorced and sealed the records to protect their son who suffers from Autism. Obama's campaign team fought in the courts to have those records unsealed. They suceeded, so Ryan had to drop out of the race, paving the way for an inevitable Obama victory.
I'm glad it is open to the public.
Down the road the libtards won't be able to get the records unsealed and try and use them to twist everything against Sarah. We know how the other side likes to get records unsealed.
There is a reason for everything. It is up to the judge to control the circus.
Watch and see the Scum will have a different lawyer.
Is Thomas Van Flein a Child Custody lawyer?
Bristol needs the best Child CUSTODY lawyer that is out there.
Then expalin why Levi thinks its all about Sarah Palin, when it has nothing to do with her. In his brief he talked more about Sarah than he did about his own son. What does that tell you Sandra?
Not at all hrh, I and all others here love all of your posts. Keep up the good work!
Just for clarification, it was Jack Ryan. Jim Ryan ran for governor in 2002 and again now in 2010. George Ryan is the former Governor who is currently in jail. There are a lot of Ryans in IL politics.
<span>I'm glad it is open to the public.
Down the road the libtards won't be able to get the records unsealed and try and use them to twist everything against Sarah. We know how the other side likes to get records unsealed.
There is a reason for everything. It is up to the judge to control the circus.
Watch and see the Scum will have a different lawyer.
Is Thomas Van Flein a Child Custody lawyer?
Bristol needs a Child CUSTODY lawyer.
We know how the game is played.</span>
Thanks for the clarification Whit. :)
I suspect he had more time then to get involved in domestic issues. I don't think this would be a high priority. Just a hunch.
It'll be neat if it's all in one hour rather than stringing it out over 3 nights like it was originally shown ...
Any procedure or process that gratutiously bring Sarah Palin into the process is itself suspect, but we all know why this is being played to the hilt going into 2010: to remind conservative and evangelical voters of the 'single motherhood of Bristol Palin" and then to allows supporters of Huckabee and Romney to use it behind the scenes to cause potential supporters of Sarah Palin from entering her tent. Nothing else is sticking to Palin right now. When in doubt go back to the fundamentals.
Yeah Sandra, just like I'm sure Obama had no time to declare a war on FOX News because he didn't think it was a high priority. Just a hunch.
That is exactly what Levi and Levi's handlers want-for Sarah to lash out at Levi and call him a douchebag. Don't you get it? It would go straight to TMZ, Radaronline, Entertainment Tonight and the National Enquirer, while Levi can spout anything he wants to say including that his mother-in-law is not allowing him to see his child etc etc.
I think thats what it is hrh.
Calling a judge those names simply means that those words apply to you.
HI, I am new here, well not so new I often read the site, but not very computer literate. And think I will finally start to, how is it said..Blog??? Please be patient with this old grandma.
Hi everyone, a am older than I like to admit and out of my many decades of life experience, I would like to add my 2 cents.
I think we all need to just hope this is resolved quickly. Maybe I am a little too old or old school. But in the end I hope these 2 very young children( they are still children in my eyes) both cut out the pettiness for the sake of the little one.
Some things may be Levis fault, some may be Bristols, they both need to do a little more growing in my mind. But I do think it is important for a child to have both a mother and a father in their lives.
Come on Sandra. This is so easy, you keep throwing the ball right down the middle and I keep hitting it out of the park. Throw me a curveball for once, I need a challenge.
Because you say so?
Well aboard. I agree with your sentiment but as this is a political blog let my state IMHO Levi's action is strictly a political exercise orchestrated by forces associated with George Soros and Barack Obama to embarrass Sarah Palin or distract her from keeping her eye on the ball which is the 2010 midterms. When you have all the money in the world you can do anything you want. The old saying is if you throw enough mud against the wall some of it might stick.
First Levi Johnston bared his bod in Playgirl for the world to see. Now he wants to bare his custody battle with Bristol Palin for the world to see as well.
<span>And </span>two judges in Alaska have agreed that the fight over son Tripp is best played out in public, one of them ruling, according to the Anchorage Daily News, that Bristol hadn't offered any proof that the child would be harmed by the publicity.
~~ Apparently the judge has never moderated comments on the Internet? Where the public is super-duper gentle? ~~
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2009/12/levi-johnston-bristol-palin-custody-battle-tripp.html
Welcome, Guest! Great to have you!:)
Granny...can I call you Granny?...;) Guest is so informal! And we need more Grannies here! ;)
I agree...to a point. Levi...with his recent behavior and "exposure"..has placed his son in a detrimental situation and that is not in the best interest of the child. My fear is that Levi...if given any Parental rights will use Tripp to gain further media attention. Let's face it...the guy is a mental moron. He surrounds himself with "less than ethical" folks...who are only there to make all the money they can off him...while his 15 minutes of fame time clock is still ticking. Until Levi decides to yank his head from his behind...he should not be allowed to expose his child to his "current" life choice.
P.S.. Welcome and post more often!
Sarah Palin has tremendous power in Alaska. This why homage must be paid to her. Levi has consistently said that he wants more time with his son. That has been his motivation.
I'm responding to the comment about the Palins. Bristol is the only Palin the judge will be concerned about. It is too bad that there are other parties involved in this.
Welcome! We need to find you a name Guest.
Welcome "old grandma" from another "old grandma".....I think the Judge's ruling that this will be public is because he is giving Levi rope to see if he hangs himself.
If Levi starts mouthing off about Sarah and others in the family, as well as giving interviews to reporters, etc., the Judge will find it necessary to rule that he cannot discuss anything about the Palin family to anyone. In the long run this is what Bristol and the Palin's want. Levi to keep his mouth shut.
Could the threat of impeachment of the Judges by the citzenry or Parnell be brought to bear?
You mean...like certain members of the Obama administration? (Cough) Rahm and Axelgrease.
Tell that to Scum boy.
"<span>I'm responding to the comment about the Palins. Bristol is the only Palin the judge will be concerned about. It is too bad that there are other parties involved in this."
sandrfainoregon, Tell that to Scum boy.
</span>
<span>sandrfainoregon, Tell that to Scum boy.
"<span>I'm responding to the comment about the Palins. Bristol is the only Palin the judge will be concerned about. It is too bad that there are other parties involved in this."</span></span>
If he was worried about that he would have remained silent.
I tried to post under my name but soemone it didn't show up. Oh well I will try and figure it out...it took me a very long time to get something to show up. But I answer very well to nana granny or grandma. My name is Buffy though ( nickname for Bethea--yuck --bless my parents but they picked out horrible names and then nicknamed us all)
Guest
Welcome to C4P
In every public custody battle there are four versions to the story, the fathers’ version, the mothers’ version, the media version and the truth. Onlookers can only judge by appearance and based on appearance I know what I believe. Nevertheless this is not an issue of “fault” it is an issue of what would be in the best interest of the child.
Ideally cutting out the pettiness would work well and everyone here could only hope for that, but it seems that it’s one sided, As much as the Palin’s have tried to reach out to Levi he has continuously found new ways to decline their offer, while punching them in the face, on live television.
In an ideal world all children would have a father and a mother, unfortunately this is not an ideal world. When a father as no shame and takes every opportunity to take a shot at his son’s mother, grandmother and entire family without considering the ramifications just to make a quick buck. When a father will strip naked to show off what he doesn’t have just to get his 15 minutes. Then no, this father does not deserve to be anywhere near his son, he simply can’t be trusted.
Sometimes it’s better for a child to “come from” a broken home, than to “live in” a broken home.
Bristol Palin is doing her best, her son never knows of a broken home while Levi Johnston is going out of his way to demolish it.
So yes I hope this gets resolved quickly with “What’s Best For Tripp”
But not hewr Parents Income unless this Activist Judge wants to choose bringing Sarah Palin into this more than the interest of the child. This judge is a reason why you don't put activist on the bench.
Well I have answered to Aunt Knucklehead..or Aunt Stinky Patti....(Nephew could not say sneaky....as I was always jumping out from behind corners..just to scare the crap out of him...so..he said stinky...does that clear it up for all of you?) Now ...I am just Aunt Cruela! So I'll call you Granny...for now! Acceptable?
Idiot. Bristol is a Palin, as is Tripp. Check his hyphenated last name. Plus if you meant to say it isn't about Sarah then why did this activist judge allow a statement by Levi using Sarah Palin to be involved in this? Levi's MOther is a CONVICTED FELON. I repeat A CONVICTED FELON currently doing her jail time at home. Bristol has every right to deny unsupervised access to a CONVICTED FELON doing there time. Levi's statements on Sarah is opinion not fact.
Sandra I repeat again. Grandmother Johnston is currently doing her jail time at home. Denying her access is perfectly admittable in court.
Grandma JuJu from Grandma Buffy
Maybe you bring up a good point, bless you. If it is all in the open, maybe what is said will have to be watched more and actually move the case along better. One of my granddaughters went through a similar situation last year and to tell you the truth, everything simmered down after the judge set the everyother weekend deal with her ex husband. First of all it gave her a well deserved break and made him step up to be a parent on those weekends. We can only pray that this ends in the same manner.
It has taken me a year to figure out this computer that my kids chipped in for last year, but as I get a little more slow every year, it is a good way to keep up with the world.
Bless you all for welcoming me, my daughter told me to be brave and step into the mix a little.
Lipstick. Sorry I am being so negative but many a Child Custody hearing has left people questioning WTF just happened and no there really is not much of an appeals process. This activist judge has already made one blatantly child 2nd embarrass the Palins decision. What leads you to believe these activists will not do it again?
Welcome Guest,
I am having the same problem with my name not coming up but Guest. I have changed my name but it still comes up Guest.
I have been here since last January.
Sheya: What can be done to not have the name "Guest" keep coming up when I sign in with the name I choose? Shouldn't it change when I pick a different name?
Thank you.
Maybe some one should send a copy of the comments on IM to Judge and remind him this is where the majority of people get their news today.
"<span><span>And </span>two judges in Alaska have agreed that the fight over son Tripp is best played out in public" </span>
Really?
I doubt it.
Did they decide that it was "best" or that Alaska law required the particular order in this case?
Perhaps you can quote the decision that it was "best."
hrh, that is a good question, why call "Sealed Court Records Sealed" When you can open them for "Campain Purposes" It would be interesting to read the petition and see thier so called "Reasoning behind unsealing Court records.
Been there. Complained about that.
How about Buffy the Liberal Slayer?
Poor, poor, sandra.
Have you tried clicking on the name next to your pic when you're typing in a comment? It should let you change the name.
I thought it was Jack Ryan. Jerri Ryan's former husband, you know, Seven of Nine?
Read the court documents A. Alaskas Child Custody laws are similar to almost all the States as most States (including the one my brother is a judge in) have mutual agreements and interlocking laws. If you read the documents then you would know Bristol's lawyer presented precedence where Child custody for big names were kept private (actually he presented 2). The activist judge dug up a case that nobody had ever heard of and used it as precedence with total disregard for the child. I have gone through these issues using my brother and my wife is divorced so it is safe to say you are WAY more ignorant on this than I am.
Oh next this activist judge will say is no judge has never issued restraining orders against families publicly ridiculing the other family. Out of the millions of cases (starting with my wife and ex. this has happened to this activists judge will find a totally separate case and use it). These judges are pathetic at best to use Public knowledge over childs best interests. And I speak from knowledge not ignorance on this.
Exactly. It's all political. Bristol got tired of Levi using her son as an excuse to bash the family. She's going for broke.
If a judge lets comments on C4P make their decisions then I no longer think they should be disbarred the question is how did they complete law school. Justice is blind. If they can't take deserved criticism for a bad decision then they need to find new lines of work. I hear a ditch needs dug somewhere.
test
test 2
Try doing as Uffda suggests, I just tried it and it works
Bingo. The judge wanted this Public well the sorry excuses for judges got it. If they didn't want criticism they should have kept it sealed like Bristol wanted. They made their bed they can lie in it.
Hey, Patrick. Just got in. Did we get a visit from RAM last night, or what?
Agreed. Levi has been given a severe case of PDS.
You haven't read them and you are commenting on them? And you are calling people ignorant. Do you know the definition of ignorance. If you haven't read the documents you are writing from ignorance.
Name?
My brother is a judge I have called him worse on occasion (remember we are brothers). The judge made this public so they are open to public criticism. If they didn't want criticize they shouldn't have made this public. Oh well their bad decision. My advise to them is do better during the rest of this case and stop acting like an activist judge with an ax to grind with the Palins.
Post a Comment